Abstract
Analysing life-history narratives of Swedish inventors, this paper explores how family background influences upon the formation of social and human capital and demonstrates how these capital resources affect the creative abilities of inventors. The main findings of the paper are that the socio-economic position one is born into has important implications for the development of human and social capital, and that the nature and extent of an inventor’s capital assets strongly influences the nature of his or her inventiveness. Inventors who come from higher socio-economic backgrounds have greater endowments of formal human capital than those from more modest backgrounds, and the social networks they use in their inventive work link them to other actors with human capital endowments similar to their own. Therefore, inventors with high human capital endowments will benefit from their social networks, as they constitute important means of gaining access to innovative knowledge and business advice. In contrast, inventors from lower socio-economic backgrounds with limited formal human capital resources are more likely to have actors in their social networks who themselves possess limited formal human capital. However, these inventors may become prosperous inventors if they are endowed with great social capital resources from their formative backgrounds because, for inventors, high endowments of social capital can compensate for a lack of formal human capital.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
Anderson, A. R., & Miller, C. J. (2003). “Class matters”: human and social capital in the entrepreneurial process. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(1), 17–36.
Asheim, B. T. (1996). Industrial Districts as “Learning Regions”: A condition for prosperity. European Planning Studies, 4(4), 379–400.
Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891.
Atkinson, R. (2004). Life story interview. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 566–569). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Aydalot, P. (1986). Millieux Innovateurs en Europe. Paris: GREMI.
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis and special reference to education. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carmagni, R. (1995). The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public policies in European lagging regions. Papers in Regional Science, 74(4), 317–340.
Colemann, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
Crevoisier, O. (2004). The innovative milieus approach: Toward a territorialized understanding of the economy? Economic Geography, 80(4), 367–379.
Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter Publishers/Cassell Academic.
Ejermo, O., & Bergman, K. (2014). Services vs. manufacturing—How does foreign and domestic sales impact on their R&D? Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 14(3), 367–391.
Ejermo, O., & Hansen, H. K. (2014). How important are local inventive milieus: The role of birthplace, high school and university education. Geoforum, 65, 387–397.
Florida, R. (2002). The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 734–755.
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology, policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Frances Pinter.
Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2012). The role of a regional entrepreneurship culture: Evidence and consequences. In P. Braunerhjelm (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, norms and the business cycle, Swedish Economic Forum Report 2012 (pp. 75–89). Stockholm: Entreprenörskapsforum.
Geertz, G. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.
Germeten, S. (2013). Personal narratives in life history research. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(6), 612–624.
Glaeser, E. L., & Berry, C. (2005). The divergence of human capital levels across cities. Papers in Regional Science, 84(3), 407–444.
Goodson, I., & Numan, U. (2003). Livshistoria och professjonsutveckling [Life histories and professionalism]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Granovetter, M. S. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.
Hansen, H. K., & Winther, L. (2014). Regional development and the impact of the public sector in Denmark: Employment growth and human capital. Danish Journal of Geography, 114(2), 156–168.
Hassink, R., & Klaerding, C. (2012). The end of the learning region as we knew it; towards learning in space. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1055–1066.
Henderson, S. J. (2004). Inventors: The ordinary genius next door. In R. J. Sternberg, E. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 103–125). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Henry, B., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Langley, J., & Silva, P. A. (1994). On the ‘Remembrance of Things Past’: A longitudinal evaluation of the retrospective method. Psychological Assessment, 6(2), 92–101.
Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2015). Local entrepreneurial resilience and culture: The role of social values in fostering economic recovery. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 313–330.
Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.
Linquist, M. J., Sol, J., & Van Praag, M. (2015). Why do entrepreneurial parents have entrepreneurial children? Journal of Labor Economics, 33(2), 269–296.
Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Biddles Ltd.
Malecki, E. J. (2012). Regional social capital: Why it matters. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1023–1039.
Moretti, E. (2012). The new geography of jobs. Boston, MA: Hougton Mifflin Harcourt.
Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491–503.
Mowery, D. C., & Rosenberg, N. (1998). Paths of Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15(1), 1–12.
Riessman, C. K. (2003). Analysis of personal narratives. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 331–347). London: Sage Publications.
Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2007). The long way to entrepreneurship: Personality, parenting, early interests and competencies as precursors for entrepreneurial activity among the ‘termites’. In R. K. Silbereisen & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Approaches to positive youth development (pp. 205–220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Sedig, K. (2002). Swedish innovations. Stockholm: The Swedish Institute.
Skytt-Larsen, C. B. (2016). What shapes the anatomy of inventors? A life-history analysis of Swedish patent inventors. Danish Journal of Geography, 116(2), 123–133.
Storper, M. (2013). Key to the City: How economics, institutions, social interaction, and politics shape development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (2009). Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 147–167.
Törnqvist, G. (2004). Creativity in time and space. Geografiska Annaler: Series B., Human Geography, 86(4), 227–243.
Törnqvist, G. (2011). The geography of creativity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Zheng, W. (2010). A social capital perspective of innovation from individuals to nations: Where is empirical literature directing us? International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(2), 151–183.
Funding
The work was supported by the Swedish Research Council (Grant No. 421-2011-2068).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Human and animal right statements
Research has involved human participants who have been informed and have agreed on publication of research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skytt-Larsen, C.B. The influence of the early formation of human and social capital on inventiveness: perspectives from a Swedish case study. GeoJournal 83, 1181–1192 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-017-9826-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-017-9826-3