, Volume 81, Issue 5, pp 671–680 | Cite as

Tourism along the geopolitical barrier: implications of the Holy Land fence



Geopolitical borders in the form of physical barriers greatly influence tourism, mainly as an obstacle to free transborder movement of tourists but can constitute a tourist attraction. The main aims of this article are to describe, analyze and propose a typology of consequences on tourism as a geopolitical barrier through a case study of the fence in the Holy Land. The security fence dividing Israel and the Palestinian Authority is also called a separation fence or wall and it is located in the heart of a tourism region of global interest. The methodology is based on a review of literature that deals with the ramifications of such a fence in general and specifically with reference to tourism. The study provides an understanding of the new reality created by the fence, its varied influences on tourism planning and its ramifications on physical, environmental, administrative and image-related aspects of reality in the area.


Security fence/wall Geopolitical borders Israel The Palestinian Authority 


  1. Arieli, S., Sfard, M., (2008). The Wall of Folly. Aliyat Hagag and Yedioth Books (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  2. Baker, F. (1993). The Berlin wall: Production, preservation and consumption of a 20th century monument. Antiquity, 67(4), 709–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bannister, S. R. (1981). The olympic games, past, present and future. In O. Seagrave & D. Chu (Eds.), Olympism. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  4. Belhassen, Y., Uriely, N., & Assor, O. (2014). The touristification of a conflict zone: The case of Bil’in. Annals of Tourism Research, 49, 174–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biger, G. (2004). Fences and borders around the World. Israeli Ministry of Defense (Hebrew): Tel-Aviv.Google Scholar
  6. Brin, E. (2006). Politically-oriented tourism in Jerusalem. Tourist Studies, 6(3), 215–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caney, S. (2005). Justice beyond borders: A global political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen-Hattab, K., & Shoval, N. (2015). Tourism, religion and pilgrimage in Jerusalem. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Feldman, J. (2011). Abraham the settler, Jesus the refugee contemporary conflict and Christianity on the road to Bethlehem. History and Memory, 23(1), 62–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foley, M., & Lennon, J. J. (1996). JFK and dark tourism: A fascination with assassination. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2(4), 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Folman, Y. (2004). The story of the security fence: Life repudiation indeed?. Jerusalem: Carmel (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  12. Gelbman, A. (2008). Border tourism in Israel: Conflict, peace, fear and hope. Tourism Geographies, 10(2), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gelbmen, A. (2014). Heritage tourism in Israel and its neighboring countries as a peace promoter, In P. Jurlina (Ed.), Cultural heritage and political of Memory (pp. 165–179). Zagreb: University of Zagreb. Google Scholar
  14. Gelbman, A., & Keinan, O. (2007). National and transnational borderlanders’ attitudes towards the security fence between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. GeoJournal, 68(4), 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gelbman, A., & Timothy, D. J. (2010). From hostile boundaries to tourist attractions. Current Issues in Tourism, 13(3), 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gelbman, A., & Timothy, D. J. (2011). Border complexity, tourism and international exclaves: A case study. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), 110–131.Google Scholar
  17. Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2013). Tourism as politics: The case of Palestine. In L. Blanchard & F. Higgins-Desbiolles (Eds.), Peace through tourism: Promoting human security through international citizenship (pp. 61–74). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Kimhi, I. (Ed.). (2006). The security fence in Jerusalem: Its impact on the city residents. Jerusalem: The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies.Google Scholar
  19. Kliot, N., & Charney, I. (2006). The geography of suicide terrorism in Israel. GeoJournal, 66(4), 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koenig, H. (1981). The two berlins. Travel Holiday, 156(4), 58–63.Google Scholar
  21. Koensler, A., & Papa, C. (2011). Political tourism in the Israeli–Palestinian space. Anthropology Today, 27(2), 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kotler, P., Haider, D. H., & Rein, I. (1993). Marketing places. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kuper, A. (2004). Democracy beyond borders: Justice and representation in global institutions. UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Light, D. (2000). Gazing on communism: Heritage tourism and post-communist identities in Germany, Hungary and Romania. Tourism Geographies, 2(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matznetter, J. (1979). Border and tourism: Fundamental relations. In G. Gruber, H. Lamping, W. Lutz, J. Matznetter, & K. Vorlaufer (Eds.), Tourism and Borders: Proceedings of the Meeting of the UGU Working Group-Geography of Tourism and Recreation (pp. 61–73). Frankfurt a.m.: Institut fur Wirtschafts un Sozialgeographie der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universitat.Google Scholar
  26. Moufakkir, O., & Kelly, I. (2010). Introduction peace and tourism: Friends not foes. In O. Moufakkir & I. Kelly (Eds.), Tourism, progress and peace (pp. xvi–xxxii). Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newman, D. (2006a). The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Newman, D. (2006b). The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  30. Pullan, W. (2013). Conflict’s tools, borders, boundaries and mobility in Jerusalem’s spatial structures. Nobilities, 8(1), 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sharply, R., & Stone, R. (2009). The darker side of travel: Future research directions and concluding comments. In R. Sharply & R. Stone (Eds.), The darker side of travel: The theory and practice of dark tourism (pp. 247–264). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  32. Short, J. R., & Kim, Y. H. (1993). Urban representations: Selling the city in difficult times. In T. Hall & P. Hubbard (Eds.), The entrepreneurial city: Geographies of politics, regime and representation (pp. 55–75). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  33. Shoval, N., & Stern, A. (2008). The impact of the separation fence on the accessibility to hospitals in the Jerusalem region. HaMishpat, 25, 38–46. Hebrew.Google Scholar
  34. Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New york: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Timothy, D. J. (1999). Cross-border partnership in tourism resource management: International parks along the US–Canada border. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7(3&4), 182–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Timothy, D. J. (2001). Tourism and political boundaries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Timothy, D. J., & Emmett, C. F. (2014). Jerusalem, tourism, and the politics of heritage. In M. Adelman & E. Fendius (Eds.), Jerusalem conflict and cooperation in a contested city. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wachowiak, H. (Ed.). (2012). Tourism and borders: Contemporary issues policies and international research. UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kinneret College on the Sea of GalileeZemachIsrael

Personalised recommendations