, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 55–75 | Cite as

The ancient water system at the Upper city of Hasankeyf, Turkey

  • Eser Deniz Oğuz-Kırca


In this paper, the water distribution system at the Upper city of a well-preserved medieval town of Hasankeyf near the Tigris is questioned and its relation to the urban settlement pattern is assessed. The discussions are based on the cistern-intensive and available canal data collected within the residential borders of the Upper city in 2005. Being the third level features of the water system, the cisterns the majority of which are now attributable to the “conical, small and individual” typology, have shown that they were actively operated through the open rock-cut canals which were fed by the backbone of the distribution network—namely the siphon system, until recent times. Although a considerable number of converted cisterns hallmark shifts in the function of the water system and the changing conjectures over time, the blue prints of such a big “hydro-design” reveal the competence of semi-arid occupational environments in Upper Mesopotamia in showing how to cope with the topographical constraints and climatic disadvantages and turn these into an opportunity through the efficient use of terrain along with a carefully designed settlement area. That the Upper city now offers numerous water features makes this piece of land quite a representative of the regional works and shows the apex of the perception of ancient technology achieved with the siphon that could have been launched in the Roman era, and the state of art of planning ancient natural and man-made habitats.


Hasankeyf Upper city Water Distribution Cistern 



The field study was conducted for the fulfilment of the thesis titled “The Water System at the Upper City of Hasankeyf and Its Impact on Urban Settlement”. I would like to express my gratitude and sincere thanks to Prof. Dr. G.M. Vedat TOPRAK for his invaluable guidance and continuous support during the field work, as well as indoor studies in the Department of Geological Engineering, METU. This study owes much to his precious suggestions on such an exciting research topic. I offer special thanks to the local dweller and friend, Yakup AYHAN, for his invaluable contributions at the Upper city. It is so much worth offering him thanks for accelerating the study with an incredible number of cisterns and limited supply of water under such a time constraint and the burning sun.


  1. Alkan, A. & Öziş, Ü. (1991). Su Mühendisliği Tarihi Açısından Çevlik Kanal ve Tünelleri. Teknik Dergi, 2(1). (2004).
  2. Alston, R. (2001). The City in Roman and Byzantine Egypt. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Arık, O. (2001). Hasankeyf Kazı ve Kurtarma Projesi (Hasankeyf Excavation and Salvage Project). In N. Tuna, J. Öztürk, & J. Velibeyoğlu (Eds.), Ilısu ve Karkamış Baraj Gölleri Altında Kalacak Arkeolojik ve Kültür Varlıklarını Kurtarma Projesi 1999 Yılı Çalışmaları (Salvage Project of the Archaeological Heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs Activities in 1999) (777–794). Ankara (TAÇDAM).Google Scholar
  4. Arık, O. (2003). Hasankeyf: Üç Dünyanın Buluştuğu Kent. Ankara: İş Bankası.Google Scholar
  5. Büyükyıldırım, G. (1994). Antalya Bölgesi Tarihi Su Yapıları. Ankara: Devlet Su İşleri (State Hydraulic Works).Google Scholar
  6. Comfort, A. (1997). Satellite remote sensing and archaeological survey on the euphrates. Archaeological Computing Newletter, 48, 1–8.Google Scholar
  7. Doyuran, V., Toprak, V., & Akgün, H. (2001). Hasankeyf Yerleşim Alanının Jeoteknik Problemleri (Geotechnical problems of Hasankeyf settlement area). In N. Tuna, J. Öztürk, J. Velibeyoğlu (Eds.), Ilısu ve Karkamış Baraj Gölleri Altında Kalacak Arkeolojik ve Kültür Varlıklarını Kurtarma Projesi 1999 Yılı Çalışmaları (Salvage project of the archaeological heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam Reservoirs Activities in 1999) (833–854). Ankara (TAÇDAM).Google Scholar
  8. Evans, H. B. (1997). Water distribution in ancient Rome: The evidence of Frontinus. US: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  9. Forbes, R. J. (1993). Studies in ancient technology (1–2). Netherlands.Google Scholar
  10. Landels, J. G. (1996). Eski Yunan ve Roma’da Mühendislik (Engineering in the ancient world). Ankara: Tr. B. Bıçakçı.Google Scholar
  11. Lenzen, C. J. (1996). Water and antiquity. United States Agency for International Development, USAID Development Experience Clearinghouse Doc. No. PN-ACG-029, The GreenCOM Project.Google Scholar
  12. Mansel, A.M. (1978). Side: 19471966 Yılları Kazıları ve Araştırmalarının Sonuçları (Excavation Reports and Related Researches), 5(33). Ankara.Google Scholar
  13. Mundy, J. H., & Riesenberg, P. (1958). The medieval town. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  14. Nydahl, H. (2002). Archaeology and water management in Jordan. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
  15. Oğuz, E.D., Toprak, G.M.V., & Tuna, N. (2011). Hasankeyf Yukarı Şehir’de Sarnıçların İkincil Kullanımı ve Kentsel Doku Üzerine Etkisi (Secondary use of cisterns at the Upper City of Hasankeyf and its impact on urban settlement). In N. Tuna & O. Doonan (Eds.), Ilısu ve Karkamış Baraj Gölleri Altında Kalacak Arkeolojik ve Kültür Varlıklarını Kurtarma Projesi 2002 Yılı Çalışmaları (Salvage project of the archaeological heritage of the Ilısu and Carchemish Dam reservoirs activities in 2002) (427–462). Ankara (TAÇDAM).Google Scholar
  16. Ortloff, C. R. (2005). The water supply and distribution system of the Nabataean City of Petra (Jordan), 300 BC–AD. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 15(1), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ortloff, C. R., & Kassinos, A. (2003). Computational fluid dynamics investigation of the hydraulic behavior of the Roman inverted siphon system at Aspendos, Turkey. Journal of Archaeological Science, 30, 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Owens, E. J. (2000). The water supply of antioch. First International Congress on Antioch in Psidia. Yalvaç, Isparta, Turkey, 2–4 July 1997.Google Scholar
  19. Palladius. (1807). The fourteen books of Palladius Rutilius Taurus Æmilianus. Tr. T. Owen. London.Google Scholar
  20. Peker, A.U. (2004). Hasankeyf Yukarı Şehir Çalışmaları- Hasankeyf Upper City Survey (2002).
  21. Plüss, M., Arık, O. (2001). Hasankeyf. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı.Google Scholar
  22. Radt, W. (2001). Pergamon: Antik Bir Kentin Tarihi ve Yapıları- Pergamon: Geschichte und Bauten Einer Antiken Metropole (Darmstadt 1999). İstanbul.Google Scholar
  23. Stambaugh, J. E. (1988). The ancient Roman city. London: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  24. TAÇDAM (Tarihsel Çevre Değerlerini Araştırma Merkezi- Centre for Research and Assessment of the Historic Environment). Ilısu Baraj Gölü ve Çevresinde Arkeolojik Kazı ve Araştırmaları (Archaeological Excavations and Researches at Ilısu Dam and Its Environs). (1998–2003). Ankara.Google Scholar
  25. Toprak, V., & Süzen, M.L. (2004). Geological and morphological control on the texture of Hasankeyf Upper City, Turkey. 5th International Symposium on Eastern Mediterranean Geology II (804–807). Thessaloniki, Greece, 14–20 April.Google Scholar
  26. Uğurlu, N.B. (2009). The Roman nypmhaea in the Cities of Asia Minor: Function in Context. VDM.Google Scholar
  27. Uluçam, A. (2006). Hasankeyf Kazıları 2005. 28. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, 28(2), 73–97. Çanakkale.Google Scholar
  28. Vitruvius. Mimarlık Üzerine On Kitap (1-10). Tr. S. Güven. Şevki Vanlı Mimarlık Vakfı. (1990). The ten books on architecture (1–10). Tr. M. H. Morgan. New York 1960.Google Scholar
  29. White, K. D. (1984). Greek and Roman technology. New York: Cornell University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middle East Technical University (Independent Researcher)AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations