, Volume 78, Issue 3, pp 553–573 | Cite as

Standing different ground: the spatial heterogeneity of territorial disputes



Recent developments in spatial analysis and spatial data have allowed researchers to investigate various geographical factors in the quantitative analysis of conflict and war (Ward in Polit Geogr 21(2):155–158, 2002). Despite the importance of territory in interstate conflict, there has been a limited interest in the application of spatial analysis to the study of territorial conflict. Using geographically weighted regression (GWR) we evaluated the existing explanations of territorial conflict provided by a global scale analysis that assumes a spatial consistency in the explanatory variables. Specifically, we revisited Paul Huth’s foundational work by using GWR to examine the spatial pattern in the sign and significance of the variables. The result of GWR shows that the escalation of territorial conflict cannot be fully explained by one universal model. There is a high level of spatial variation in the regression parameters and the explanatory power of the model varies over space. A k-means cluster analysis was implemented for a further investigation of the regional pattern of the underlying causes of territorial disputes. The result of our GWR suggests the necessity and possibility to pursue a local or regional scale approach to the study of territorial conflict, an approach that challenges an epistemology of seeking a single explanation for the causes of conflict that neglects regional context. The spatial heterogeneity in the causes of territorial conflict escalation we find is framed within a narrative of the intertwined processes of colonialism, Cold War legacies, and competition for resources.


Territorial conflict Spatial analysis Political geography Geographically weighted regression 


  1. Agnew, J. (2003). Geopolitics: Re-visioning world politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Method and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braithwaite, A. (2005). Location, location, location…identifying hot spots of international conflict. International Interactions, 31(3), 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brecher, M., & Wilkenfeld, J. (1997). A study of crisis. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bueno de mesquita, B., & Lalman, D. (1990). Domestic opposition and foreign war. American Political Science Review, 84(3), 746–766.Google Scholar
  6. Buhaug, H., & Gleditsch, K. (2008). Contagion or confusion? Why conflicts cluster in space. International Studies Quarterly, 52(2), 215–233.Google Scholar
  7. Buhaug, H., & Lujala, P. (2005). Accounting for scale: Measuring geography in quantitative studies of civil war. Political Geography, 24(4), 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buhaug, H., & Rød, J. (2006). Local determinants of African civil wars, 1970–2001. Political Geography, 25(3), 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buzan, B., & Waever, O. (2003). Regions and power: The structure of international security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charlton, M., & Fotheringham, A. (2009). Geographically weighted regression: White paper. Maynooth: National Centre for Geocomputation, National University of Ireland.Google Scholar
  11. Charlton, M., Fotheringham, S., & Brunson, C. (2003). GWR 3: Software for geographically weighted regression, Version 3.0.1. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Spatial Analysis Research Group, University of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
  12. Diehl, P. (1991). The new geopolitics. In M. Ward (Ed.), The new geopolitics (pp. 11–38). Philadelphia, PA: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  13. Dodds, K. (2003). Cold war geopolitics. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, & G. Toal (Eds.), A companion to political geography (pp. 204–218). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Dzurek, D. (2005). What makes territory important: Tangible and intangible dimensions. GeoJournal, 64(4), 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elden, S. (2009). Terror and territory: The spatial extent of territory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fotheringham, A., Brunsdon, A., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Ghosn, F., Palmer, G., & Bremer, S. (2004). The MID3 data set, 1993–2001: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 21(2), 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibler, D. (1996). Alliances that never balance: The territorial settlement treaty. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15(1), 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilmore, E., Gleditsch, N., Lujala, P., & Rød, J. (2005). Conflict diamonds: A new dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 22(3), 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gleditsch, K. S. (2002). All international politics is local: The diffusion of conflict, integration, and democratization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  21. Goodchild, M., & Janelle, D. (2010). Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal, 75(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gurr, T., Jaggers, K., & Moore, W. (1990). The transformation of the Western State: The growth of democracy, autocracy, and state power since 1800. Studies in Comparative International Development, 25(1), 73–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halliday, F. (1983). The making of the second cold war. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  24. Hemmer, C., & Katzenstein, P. (2002). Why is there no NATO in Asia? Collective identity, regionalism, and the origins of multilateralism. International Organization, 56(3), 575–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hensel, P. (2000). Territory: Theory and evidence on geography and conflict. In J. Vasquez (Ed.), What do we know about war? (pp. 57–84). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Hensel, P., & Mitchell, S. (2005). Issue indivisibility and territorial claims. GeoJournal, 64(4), 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herbst, J. (2000). States and power in Africa: Comparative lessons in authority and control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Huth, P. (1996). Standing your ground: Territorial disputes and international conflict. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  29. Huth, P., & Allee, T. (2002). The democratic peace and territorial conflict in the twentieth century. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Huth, P., & Russett, B. (1998). Deterrence failure and crisis escalation. International Studies Quarterly, 32(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. (2005). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  32. Le Billon, P. (2001). The political ecology of war: Natural resources and armed conflicts. Political Geography, 20(5), 561–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lujala, P., Gleditsch, N., & Gilmore, E. (2005). A diamond curse? civil war and a lootable resource. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 538–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lujala, P., Rød, J., & Thieme, N. (2007). Fighting over oil: Introducing a new dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 24(3), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mansfield, P. (1992). The Arabs (3rd ed.). London, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. Maoz, Z., & Russett, B. (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 624–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mosse, G. L. (1993). Confronting the nation: Jewish and Western nationalism. Hanover: Brandies University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Murphy, A. (2002). National claims to territory in the modern state system: Geographical considerations. Geopolitics, 7(2), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Newman, D., & Paasi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human geography, 22(2), 186–207.Google Scholar
  40. O’Lear, S., Diehl, P., Frazier, D., & Allee, T. (2005). Dimension of territorial conflict and resolution: Tangible and intangible values of territory. GeoJournal, 64(4), 259–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Loughlin, J., & Wittmer, F. (2011). The localized geographies of violence in the North Caucasus of Russia, 1999–2007. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 178–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Loughlin, J. (2000). Geography as space and geography as place: The divide between political science and political geography continues. Geopolitics, 5(3), 126–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ó Tuathail, G. (1998). Political geography III: Dealing with deterritorialization. Progress in Human Geography, 22(1), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Páez, A., & Scott, D. (2004). Spatial statistics for urban analysis: A review of techniques with examples. GeoJournal, 61(1), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Páez, A., Uchida, T., & Miyamoto, K. (2002). A general framework for estimation and inference of geographically weighted regression models: 1. Location-specific kernel bandwidths and a test for local heterogeneity. Environment and Planning A, 34(4), 733–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peluso, N., & Vandergeest, P. (2011). Political ecologies of war and forests: Counterinsurgencies and the making of national natures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(3), 587–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raleigh, C., Cunningham, D., Wilhelmsen, L., & Gleditsch, N. (2006). Conflict Sites 19462005. Centre for the Study of Civil War, PRIO. Accessed 12 September 2011.
  48. Raleigh, C., Linke, A., Hegre, H., & Karlsen, J. (2010). Introducing ACLED: An armed conflict location and event dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 47(5), 651–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Senese, P. (2005). Territory, contiguity, and international conflict: Assessing a new joint explanation. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 769–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Senese, P., & Vasquez, J. (2003). A unified explanation of territorial conflict: Testing the impact of sampling bias, 1919–1992. International Studies Quarterly, 47(2), 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Senese, P., & Vasquez, J. (2008). The steps to war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sidaway, J. (2008). The geography of political geography. In K. Cox, M. Low, & J. Robinson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political geography (pp. 21–40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Snyder, T. (2003). The reconstruction of nations: Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Belarus, 1569–1999. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Stubbs, R. (2002). ASEAN PLUS THREE emerging East Asian regionalism? Asian Survey, 42(3), 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vasquez, J. (1993). The war puzzle. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vasquez, J. (1995). Why do neighbors fight—Proximity, contiguity, or territoriality? Journal of Peace Research, 32(3), 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vasquez, J., & Henehan, M. (2001). Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vasquez, J., & Valeriano, B. (2008). Territory as a source of conflict and a road to peace. In J. Bercovitch, V. Kremenyuk, & W. Zatman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of conflict resolution (pp. 191–209). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Väyrynen, R. (1984). Regional conflict formations: An intractable problem of international relations. Journal of Peace Research, 21(4), 337–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walter, B. (2003). Explaining the intractability of territorial conflict. International Studies Review, 5(3), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walter, B. (2006). Building reputation: Why governments fight some separatists but not others. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.Google Scholar
  63. Waltz, K. (2000). Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ward, M. (2002). The development and application of spatial analysis for political methodology. Political Geography, 21(2), 155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wheeler, D., & Tiefelsdorf, M. (2005). Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression. Journal of Geographical Systems, 7(2), 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Windle, M., Rose, G., Devillers, R., & Fortin, M-J. (2010). Exploring spatial non-stationarity of fisheries survey data using geographically weighted regression (GWR): An example from the Northwest Atlantic. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67(1), 145–154.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyung Hee UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations