, Volume 76, Issue 4, pp 365–381 | Cite as

The local politics of the global countryside: boosterism, aspirational ruralism and the contested reconstitution of Queenstown, New Zealand



This paper examines the local politics through which the reconstitution of rural localities under globalization is advanced and contested, with particular reference to the impact of international amenity migration. It contends that as globalization proceeds not by domination but by hybridization and negotiation, local politics is critical as the sphere in which the outcomes of globalization processes are interpreted and contested. The paper examines the case study of Queenstown Lakes district in South Island, New Zealand, as a locality that has experienced significant transformation through engagement with globalization processes. These include high levels of international amenity in-migration, substantial overseas investment in property, commerce and construction projects, and an increasing volume of international tourists. Collectively, these processes have contributed to rapid population growth and intensive pressure for the development of rural land in the area. As detailed in the paper, land use planning became the dominant issue in local politics, with conflict between groups informed by ‘boosterist’ and ‘environmentalist’ stand-points, as well as the ‘aspirational ruralism’ of amenity in-migrants. Although locally-grounded, the conflict engaged trans-local actors and networks and transgressed space and scale, thus becoming itself an expression of globalization.


Globalization Local politics New Zealand Planning Rural restructuring Amenity migration 


  1. Albrecht, D. E. (2007). Small town in global society. Southern Rural Sociology, 22, 1–14.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, A. (2002). A fragile plenty: Pre-European Maori and the New Zealand environment. In E. Pawson & T. Brooking (Eds.), Environmental histories of New Zealand (pp. 19–34). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ansley, B. (2000). Chewing the scenery. New Zealand Listener, 25 (November), p. 22.Google Scholar
  4. Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7, 295–310. doi: 10.1177/026327690007002017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baragwanath, L., McAloon, J., & Perkins, H. (2003). Globalisation and New Zealand: Anchoring the Leviathan in a regional context. New Zealand Geographer, 59, 16–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7939.2003.tb01663.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bebbington, A. (2001). Globalized Andes? Livelihoods, landscapes and development. Ecumene, 8, 369–380. doi: 10.1191/096746001701557084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, D. (2006). Variations on the rural idyll. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 149–160). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Bond, S., & Thompson-Fawcett, M. (2006). Design-led participatory planning. In M. Thompson-Fawcett & C. Freeman (Eds.), Living together: Towards inclusive communities (pp. 171–194). Dunedin: Otago University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Busch, L., & Bain, C. (2004). New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system. Rural Sociology, 69, 321–346. doi: 10.1526/0036011041730527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CAFCA. (2008). Foreign investment in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Decisions of the overseas investment commission and overseas investment office. Retrieved November 14, 2008 from Campaign Against Foreign Control of Aotearoa Web site,
  11. Cater, C. (2001). Beyond the gaze: The reflexive tourist and the search for embodied experience. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  12. Cater, C., & Smith, L. (2003). New country visions: Adventurous bodies in rural tourism. In P. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 195–217). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  13. Chaverri, P. P. (2006). Cultural and environmental amenities in peri-urban change: The case of San Antonio de Escazú, Costa Rica. In L. Moss (Ed.), The amenity migrants (pp. 187–199). Wallingford, CT: CABI.Google Scholar
  14. Cloke, P. (1989). State deregulation and New Zealand’s agricultural sector. Sociologia Ruralis, 29, 34–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1989.tb00354.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cloke, P., & Le Heron, R. (1994). Agricultural deregulation: The case of New Zealand. In P. Lowe, T. Marsden, & S. Whatmore (Eds.), Regulating agriculture (pp. 104–126). London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
  16. Cloke, P., & Perkins, H. C. (1998). ‘Cracking the canyon with the awesome foursome’: Representations of adventure tourism in New Zealand. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space, 16, 185–218. doi: 10.1068/d160185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cloke, P., & Perkins, H. C. (2002). Commodification and adventure in New Zealand tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 5, 521–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper, W. (2000). Careful consideration behind Wakatipu planning consents. Otago Daily Times, 16 November 2000, p. 22.Google Scholar
  19. Cox, K. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17, 1–24. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(97)00048-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crot, L. (2006). ‘Scenographic’ and ‘cosmetic’ planning: Globalization and territorial restructuring in Buenos Aires. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28, 227–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2006.00290.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Drew, K. (1999). Deer farming in Otago and Southland. In P. Sorrell (Ed.), The cyclopedia of Otago and Southland. Dunedin: Dunedin City Council.Google Scholar
  22. Dummond, I., & Marsden, T. (1999). The condition of sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Easton, B. (1997). In stormy seas: The post-war New Zealand economy. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Echánove, F. (2005). Globalization and restructuring in rural Mexico: The case of fruit growers. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96, 15–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00436.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Edmondson, J. (2003). Prairie town: Redefining rural life in the age of globalization. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  26. Epp, R., & Whitson, D. (Eds.). (2001). Writing off the rural west: Globalization, governments and the transformation of rural communities. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ericksen, N. J., Berke, P. R., Crawford, J. L., & Dixon, J. E. (2003). Planning for sustainability: New Zealand under the Resource Management Act. Hamilton: International Global Change Institute, University of Waikato.Google Scholar
  28. Glorioso, R. S. (2006). A bioregion in jeopardy: The strategic challenge of amenity migration in Baguio, the Philippines. In L. Moss (Ed.), The amenity migrants (pp. 261–277). Wallingford, CT: CABI.Google Scholar
  29. Goodman, D., & Watts, M. (1997). Globalizing food: Agrarian questions and global restructuring. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, C. M. (2006). Amenity migration in the South Island of New Zealand: Contestation for land and landscape in Central Otago. In L. Moss (Ed.), The amenity migrants (pp. 295–305). Wallingford, CT: CABI.Google Scholar
  31. Hendrickson, M., & Heffernan, W. D. (2002). Opening spaces through relocalization: Locating potential resistance in the weaknesses of the global food system. Sociologia Ruralis, 43, 347–369. doi: 10.1111/1467-9523.00221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hjalager, A.-M. (2007). Stages in the economic globalization of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 34, 437–457. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2006.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hogan, J. (2004). Constructing the global in two rural communities in Australia and Japan. Journal of Sociology 40, 21–40. doi: 10.1177/1440783304040451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hogg, M. (2001). Power in paradise: Elite agency in landscape transformation—A Queenstown case study. Unpublished BA dissertation, University of Otago.Google Scholar
  35. Jackiewicz, E. L. (2006). Community-centred globalization: Modernization under control in rural Costa Rica. Latin American Perspectives, 33, 136–146. doi: 10.1177/0094582X06294139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kelsey, J. (1997). The New Zealand experiment: A world model for structural adjustment?. Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
  37. King, R., Warnes, T., & Williams, A. (2000). Sunset lives: British retirement migration to the Mediterranean. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  38. Larner, W. (1998). Hitching a ride on the tiger’s back: Globalisation and spatial imaginaries in New Zealand. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space, 16, 599–614. doi: 10.1068/d160599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Le Heron, R., & Pawson, E. (Eds.). (1996). Changing places: New Zealand in the nineties. Auckland: Longman Paul.Google Scholar
  40. MAC Property. (2007). Queenstown property market update. Retrieved November 11, 2008 from MAC Property website
  41. Magnusson, W. (2003). Introduction: The puzzle of the political. In W. Magnusson & K. Shaw (Eds.), A political space: Reading the global through Clayoquot sound (pp. 1–20). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  42. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. McCarthy, J. (2008). Rural geography: Globalizing the countryside. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 129–138. doi: 10.1177/0309132507082559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McClure, M. (2004). The wonder country: Making New Zealand tourism. Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
  45. McMichael, P. (1994). The global restructuring of agro-food systems. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Moss, L. (Ed.). (2006). The amenity migrants. Wallingford, CT: CABI.Google Scholar
  47. Murdoch, J. (2003). Co-constructing the countryside: Hybrid networks and the extensive self. In P. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 263–282). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  48. Murdoch, J. (2006). Networking rurality: Emergent complexity in the countryside. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 171–184). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Murray, W. E. (2001). The second wave of globalization and agrarian change in the Pacific Islands. Journal of Rural Studies, 17, 135–148. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00042-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Neill, S. (2000a). Mud-slinging with the mayor. The Press, 10 November 2000, 2 edn., p. 1.Google Scholar
  51. Neill, S. (2000b). Our national treasure. The Dominion, 5(December), 2000.Google Scholar
  52. NZ Winemakers. (2004). Annual report 2004. Auckland: NZ Winemakers.Google Scholar
  53. Pearce, D. G., & Cant, P. G. (1981). The development and impact of tourism in Queenstown. New Zealand Man and Biosphere Report Number 7. Christchurch: Department of Geography, University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
  54. Peart, R. (2004). A place to stand: The protection of New Zealand’s natural and cultural landscapes. Auckland: Environmental Defence Society.Google Scholar
  55. Perkins, H. C. (2006). Commodification: Re-resourcing rural areas. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 243–257). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. (2004). An overview to the Queenstown property market. Retrieved November 2, 2004 from Queenstown Property website
  57. Schmied, D. (2005). Incomers and locals in the European countryside. In D. Schmied (Ed.), Winning and losing: The changing geography of Europe’s rural areas (pp. 141–166). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  58. Shatkin, G. (2004). Globalization and local leadership: Growth, power and politics in Thailand’s eastern seaboard. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 11–26. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00500.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sorrell, P. (Ed.). (1999). The cyclopedia of Otago and Southland. Dunedin: Dunedin City Council.Google Scholar
  60. Stahre, U. (2004). City in change: Globalization, local politics and urban movements in contemporary Stockholm. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 68–85. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00503.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stringer, C., & Le Heron, R. (Eds.). (2008). Agri-food commodity chains and globalisation networks. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  62. Torres, R. M., & Momsen, J. D. (2005). Gringolandia: The construction of a new tourist space in Mexico. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers, 95, 314–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00462.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tourism Research Council New Zealand. (2006). Regional tourism organizations statistics. Retrieved February 12, 2006 from Tourism Research Council New Zealand website
  64. Tourism Research Council New Zealand. (2008a). New Zealand Regional Tourism Forecasts 2008–2014: Lake Wanaka RTO. Retrieved November 11, 2008 from Tourism Research Council New Zealand website
  65. Tourism Research Council New Zealand. (2008b). New Zealand Regional Tourism Forecasts 2008–2014: Queenstown RTO. Retrieved November 11, 2008 from Tourism Research Council New Zealand website
  66. Whitson, D. (2001). Nature as playground: Recreation and gentrification in the Mountain West. In R. Epp & D. Whitson (Eds.), Writing off the rural west (pp. 145–164). Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
  67. Woods, M. (2003). Deconstructing rural protest: The emergence of a new social movement. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(3), 309–325. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00008-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Woods, M. (2006). Foreword. In M. Thompson-Fawcett & C. Freeman (Eds.), Living together: Towards inclusive communities (pp. 7–12). Dunedin: Otago University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Woods, M. (2007). Engaging the global countryside: Globalization, power and the hybrid reconstitution of rural place. Progress in Human Geography, 31(4), 385–508. doi: 10.1177/0309132507079503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aberystwyth UniversityAberystwythUK

Personalised recommendations