, Volume 71, Issue 4, pp 221–231 | Cite as

Peace Parks and jaguar trails: transboundary conservation in a globalizing world



An increasingly utilized strategy for expanding conservation in the developing world has been the promotion of protected areas that supersede national borders. Alternatively known as transfrontier biosphere reserves, transfrontier or transboundary conservation areas, or Peace Parks, these protected areas are aggressively advanced by conservation agencies for their purported ecological and economic benefits. This article provides a comparative assessment of two case studies to understand the various impacts of transboundary conservation. The Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park, which unites protected areas in South Africa, Mozambique and Zimbabwe, is contrasted with efforts to protect jaguars along the United States–Mexico border. We argue that while these cases are promising for the purposes of biodiversity protection, they demonstrate that transboundary conservation can minimize political context, contributes to the hegemony of international conservation agendas, and remains closely linked to economic neoliberalism and decentralization in the developing world.


Conservation Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park Peace Park South Africa Transboundary conservation Transfrontier conservation U.S.–Mexico border 



Research completed by the first author in South Africa was generously supported by the Institute for the study of World Politics, the Association of American Geographers, and the University of Texas Special Research Grant. The second author received research support from the Social Sciences Research Council, the University of Texas College of Liberal Arts U.S.-Mexico Borderlands Research Award, and the Robert E. Veselka Endowed Fellowship. We would like to thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.


  1. Adams, W. M. (2001). Green development: Environment and sustainability in the Third World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. African Wildlife Federation. (2002). Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park will double land for wildlife-including Kruger’s 10,000 elephants. Retrieved June 22, 2007, from = true.
  3. Ali, S. H. (Ed.). (2007). Peace Parks: Conservation and conflict resolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, D. E. (2000). Search for El Tigre. Defenders, 75(1). Retrieved June 30, 2007, from
  5. Brown, D. E., & Gonzalez, C. L. (2001). Borderland jaguars. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carruthers, J. (1995). The Kruger National Park: A social and political history. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chapin, M. (2004). A challenge to conservationists. World Watch, (November/December), pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
  8. Childs, J. L. (1998). Tracking the felids of the borderlands. El Paso, TX: Printing Corner Press.Google Scholar
  9. Duffy, R. (1997). The environmental challenge to the nation-state: Superparks and national parks policy in Zimbabwe. Journal of Southern African Studies, 23(3), 441–451. doi: 10.1080/03057079708708549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellis, S. (1994). Of elephants and men: Politics and nature conservation in Southern Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 20(1), 53–69. doi: 10.1080/03057079408708386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fall, J. J. (1999). Transboundary biosphere reserves: A new framework for cooperation. Environmental Conservation, 26(4), 252–255. doi: 10.1017/S0376892999000363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glenn, W. (1996). Eyes of fire: Encounter with a borderlands jaguar. El Paso, TX: Printing Corner Press.Google Scholar
  13. Godwin, P. (2001). Without borders. National Geographic, September.Google Scholar
  14. Graham, W. (2001). Birth of long-awaited Peace Park begins. Pretoria News, September 26Google Scholar
  15. Grigione, M. M., & Mrykalo, R. (2004). Effects of artificial night lighting on endangered ocelots (Leopardus paradalis) and nocturnal prey along the United States–Mexico border: A literature review and hypotheses of potential impacts. Urban Ecosystems, 7(1), 65–77. doi: 10.1023/B:UECO.0000020173.70355.ab.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herring, H. (2002). How to make your own Yellowstone, Mexican style: A corporate behemoth races to restore a Coahuilan gem. High Country News, November 11.Google Scholar
  17. Honey, M. (1999). Ecotourism and sustainable development: Who owns paradise?. Island Press: Washington DC.Google Scholar
  18. IUCN (World Conservation Union) and WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Centre). (1998). 1997 United Nations list of protected areas. IUCN Publications.Google Scholar
  19. IUCN (World Conservation Union) and WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Centre). (2006). World Commission on Protected Areas: World Database on Protected Areas, Updated March 1. Retrieved June 30, 2007 from
  20. Kerasote, T. (2007). Borders without fences. The New York Times, February 24.Google Scholar
  21. King, B. (2007). Conservation and community in the new South Africa: A case study of the Mahushe Shongwe Game Reserve. Geoforum, 38, 207–219. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kruger Park Times. (2006). Heads of state put Giriyondo on the map, August 23.Google Scholar
  23. Magome, H., & Murombedzi, J. (2003). Sharing South African national parks: Community land and conservation in a democratic South Africa. In W. M. Adams & M. Mulligan (Eds.), Decolonizing nature: Strategies for conservation in a post-colonial era (pp. 108–134). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  24. Maker, J. (2001). Miracle in Africa. Sunday Times, (September), p. 30.Google Scholar
  25. McCain, E. B., & Childs, J. L. (2008). Evidence of resident jaguars (Panthera onca) in the Southwestern United States and the implications for conservation. Journal of Mammalogy, 89(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1644/07-MAMM-F-268.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, C. (2007). Interview with author. May 3, Douglas Arizona. Notes on file with author.Google Scholar
  27. Neumann, R. P. (1998). Imposing wilderness: Struggles over livelihood and nature preservation in Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rabinowitz, A. R. (1999). The present status of jaguars (Panthera onca) in the southwestern United States. The Southwestern Naturalist, 44, 96–100.Google Scholar
  29. Ramutsindela, M. (2004). Globalisation and nature conservation strategies in 21st-Century Southern Africa. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 95(1), 61–72. doi: 10.1111/j.0040-747X.2004.00293.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramutsindela, M. (2007). Transfrontier conservation in Africa: At the confluence of capital, politics and nature. Cambridge: CAB International.Google Scholar
  31. Rosas-Rosas, O. C. (2006). Ecological status and conservation of jaguars in northeastern Sonora, Mexico. Ph.D. Dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.Google Scholar
  32. Sanderson, E. W., Redford, K. H., Chetkiewicz, C.-L. B., Medellin, R. A., Rabinowitz, A. R., Robinson, J. G., et al. (2002). Planning to save a species: The jaguar as a model. Conservation Biology, 16(1), 58–72. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00352.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schroeder, R. A. (1999). Geographies of environmental intervention in Africa. Progress in Human Geography, 23(3), 359–378.Google Scholar
  34. Secure Fence Act. (2006). Public Law 109–367. October 26, 2006, Secure Fence Act, 8.U.S·C.1103. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from = 109_cong_bills&docid = f:h6061enr.txt.pdf.
  35. Seymour, K. L. (1989). Panthera onca. Mammalian Species, 340, 1–9. doi: 10.2307/3504096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sifford, B., & Chester, C. (2007). Bridging conservation across La Frontera: An unfinished agenda for Peace Parks along the U.S.–Mexico Divide. In S. H. Ali (Ed.), Peace Parks: Conservation and conflict resolution (pp. 205–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Soule, M. (1980). Thresholds for survival: Maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. In M. Soule (Ed.), Conservation biology (pp. 151–179). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associated, Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Spenceley, A. (2006). Tourism in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park. Development Southern Africa, 23(5), 649–667. doi: 10.1080/03768350601021897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Terborgh, J. (1999). Requiem for nature. Washington, DC: Island Press/Shearwater Books.Google Scholar
  40. Travers, R. (2001). World’s first trunk trek. Lowvelder. October 9.Google Scholar
  41. UNESCO. (1996). Biosphere reserves, the Seville strategy and the statutory framework of the world network. Man and the Biosphere Programme, UNESCO, Paris, France: 18 pp.Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Census. (2006). Press release: Louisiana loses population; Arizona Edges Nevada as fastest-growing state. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from
  43. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Region (2006). News release: Jaguar critical habitat deemed not prudent. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from
  44. van der Linde, H., Oglethorpe, J., Sandwith, T., Snelson, D., & Tessema, Y. (2001). Beyond boundaries: Transboundary natural resources management in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: Biodiversity Support Programme.Google Scholar
  45. Westing, A. H. (1998). Establishment and the management of transfrontier reserves for conflict prevention and confidence building. Environmental Conservation, 25(2), 91–94. doi: 10.1017/S0376892998000137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wolmer, W. (2003). Transboundary conservation: The politics of ecological integrity in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park. Journal of Southern African Studies, 29(1), 261–278. doi: 10.1080/0305707032000060449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. World Bank. (2004). Transfrontier conservation areas pilot and institutional strengthening project, Project P001759. Maputo: World Bank.Google Scholar
  48. Zbicz, D. C. (1999). The ‘nature’ of transboundary cooperation. Environment, 41(3), 15–17.Google Scholar
  49. Zerner, C. (Ed.). (2000). People, plants, and justice: The politics of nature conservation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Zimmerer, K. S. (2006). Cultural ecology: At the interface with political ecology—the new geographies of environmental conservation and globalization. Progress in Human Geography, 30(1), 63–78. doi: 10.1191/0309132506ph591pr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.The University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations