Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 66, Issue 4, pp 285–293 | Cite as

The Changing Face of US-Europe Relations: Geopolitical Causes and Possible Consequences

  • Alexander B. Murphy
Article

Abstract

Relations between the United States and Europe have been quite volatile over the past five years. This volatility is not just a product of disagreements over the American invasion of Iraq. It is tied to a set of fundamental challenges to the geopolitical arrangements and understandings that emerged in the wake of World War II. Three challenges were of particular importance: the fall of the Iron Curtain, the Balkan crisis of the 1990s, and the election of a presidential administration in Washington, DC, which adopted a neoconservative geopolitical agenda. The global impacts of this agenda were heightened by the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States of America. The U.S. response exposed fundamental differences between the U.S. and Europe on the use of international military forces in the “war on terrorism,” the role of NATO, and the U.S. government’s effort to force “regime change” in Iraq. Europe’s reaction to U.S. policy has not been uniform, however. At the governmental level, fundamental differences have emerged among European countries. The United States has sought to highlight those differences, suggesting that the U.S. favors “disaggregation” in Europe, even as it trumpets the virtues of a uniform response to the threat of terrorism. The future trajectory of U.S.-European relations is likely to be shaped by intersections between Europe’s struggles with integration and the U.S.’s evolving global geopolitical posture, which could move in either a hegemonic or a globalist direction.

Keywords

transatlantic relations geopolitics neoconservative unilateralism United States Europe European Union 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brzezinski, Z. (2003). Where Do We Go From Here? Internationale Politik (Transatlantic Edition) 4 (3), 3–10.Google Scholar
  2. Buchan, A. (1973). Europe and America: From Alliance to Coalition. Farnborough, England: Saxon House for the Atlantic Institute for International Affairs.Google Scholar
  3. Caldwell, D. (2002). The Insecurity of Security: NATO and the New Strategic Landscape. Final Report, NATO/EAPC Research Fellowship, http://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/01–03/caldwell.pdf (last accessed 1 September 2006).Google Scholar
  4. Calleo, D. P. (2001). Rethinking Europe’s Future. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, F. (Ed.) (2004). The Future of Europe: Integration and Enlargement. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Colombani, J.-M. (2001). We Are All Americans. Le Monde September 12, reprinted in English translation at World Press Review Online (2004): http://www.worldpress.org/1101we_are_all_americans.htm (last accessed 1 September 2006.
  7. Daalder, I. H. & Lindsay, J. M. (2003). American Foreign Policy and Transatlantic Relations in the Age of Global Politics. In G. Lindstrom (Ed.), Shift or Rift: Assessing US-EU Relations After Iraq (pp. 91–104). Paris: Institute for Security Studies, European Union.Google Scholar
  8. Dodds, K. (2000). Geopolitics in a Changing World. Harlow, England: Pearson Education, Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Economist, The (2003). A Change of Heart, 368 (8340), 6 September, 27–28.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (2003). Iraq and Peace in the World (Flash Eurobarometer 151), http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/iraq/doc/fl151_iraq_full_report.pdf(last accessed 1 September 2006).
  11. Friedberg, A. L. (2001). Introduction. In R. J. Ellings & A. L. Friedberg (Eds.), Strategic Asia 2001–02: Power and Purpose. (pp. 1–25), Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research.Google Scholar
  12. Fukuyama, F. (2004). The Neoconservative Moment. The National Interest, 76(Summer), 57–69.Google Scholar
  13. Haglund, D. G. (2003). Trouble in Pax Atlantica? The United States, Europe, and the Future of Multilateralism. In R.␣Foot, S. N. MacFarlane & M. Mastanduno (Eds.), US Hegemony and International Organizations: The United States and Multilateral Institutions, (pp. 215–238). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hodge, C. C. (2005). Atlanticism for a New Century: The Rise, Triumph, and Decline of NATO. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. Holmes, J. W. (1997). The United States and Europe After the Cold War: A New Alliance? Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  16. Judt, T. (2004). The World We Have Lost. Newsweek (International Edition), CXL111 (22), 31 May, 36–38.Google Scholar
  17. Kagan, R. (2003). Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  18. Layne, C. (2003). America as European Hegemon. The National Interest, 72(Summer), 17–30.Google Scholar
  19. Lucarelli, S. (2000). Europe and the Breakup of Yugoslavia: A Political Failure in Search of a Scholarly Explanation. The Hague and Boston: Kluwer International.Google Scholar
  20. Lundestad, G. (1998). Empire by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945–1997. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mead, W. R. (2004). Power, Terror, Peace, and War: America’s Grand Strategy in a World at Risk. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  22. Murphy, A. B. (2001). Review of Klaus Dodds and David Atkinson (Eds.), Geopolitical Traditions: A Century of Geopolitical Thought (London and New York: Routledge, 2000), for Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(4), 767–769.Google Scholar
  23. Murphy, A. B. & Johnson C. M. (2004). German Geopolitics in Transition. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 45(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nye, J. (2002). The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ó Tuathail, G. (1996). Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  26. Palmer, J. (1987). Europe Without America? The Crisis in Atlantic Relations. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (2004). A Year After Iraq War: Mistrust of America in Europe Ever Higher, Muslim Anger Persists. Washington, DC, http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/206.pdf (last accessed 1 September 2006).
  28. Pond, E. (2004). Friendly Fire: The Near-Death of the Transatlantic Alliance. Pittsburgh: European Union Studies Association.Google Scholar
  29. Powell, C. (2004). Give the Transatlantic Alliance a Fresh Start. Financial Times, 29 June, 15.Google Scholar
  30. Pfaff, W. (2003). Fear, Anger, Failure: A Chronicle of the Bush Administration’s War Against Terror from the Attacks of September 11, 2001, to Defeat in Baghdad. New York: Algora Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Prestowitz, C. (2003). Rogue Nation: American Unilateralism and the Failure of Good Intentions. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Project for the New American Century (2004). http://www.newamericancentury.org/ (last accessed 1 September 2006).
  33. Risse, T. (2003). For a New Transatlantic—and European—Bargain. Internationale Politik (Transatlantic Edition), 4(3), 22–30.Google Scholar
  34. Trachtenberg, M. (1999). A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement, 1945–1963. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of OregonEugeneUnited States of America

Personalised recommendations