Advertisement

GeoInformatica

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 169–191 | Cite as

Area Collapse and Road Centerlines based on Straight Skeletons

  • Jan-Henrik Haunert
  • Monika Sester
Article

Abstract

Skeletonization of polygons is a technique, which is often applied to problems of cartography and geographic information science. Especially it is needed for generalization tasks such as the collapse of small or narrow areas, which are negligible for a certain scale. Different skeleton operators can be used for such tasks. One of them is the straight skeleton, which was rediscovered by computer scientists several years ago after decades of neglect. Its full range of practicability and its benefits for cartographic applications have not been revealed yet. Based on the straight skeleton an area collapse that preserves topological constraints as well as a partial area collapse can be performed. An automatic method for the derivation of road centerlines from a cadastral dataset, which uses special characteristics of the straight skeleton, is shown.

Keywords

skeletonization straight skeleton generalization road centerlines 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work shows results of the project entitled ‘Updating of Geographic Data in a Multiple Representation Database’. The project is funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft). It is part of the bundle-project entitled ‘Abstraction of Geographic Information within Multi-Scale Acquisition, Administration, Analysis and Visualization’.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Ai and P. van Oosterom. “Gap-tree extensions based on skeletons,” in D. Richardson and P.J.M. van Oosterom (Eds.), Advances in Spatial Data Handling, 10th International Symposium on Spatial Data handling, 501–513, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. Aichholzer, F. Aurenhammer, D. Alberts, and B. Gärtner. “A novel type of skeleton for polygons,” J.UCS: Journal of Universal Computer Science, Vol. 1(12):752–761, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Bader and R. Weibel. “Detecting and resolving size and proximity conflicts in the generalization of polygonal maps,” in Proceedings of 18th International Cartographic Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 1525–1532, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F.Y. Chin, J. Snoeyink, and C.A. Wang. “Finding the medial axis of a simple polygon in linear time,” in ISAAC ’95: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation, pp. 382–391, Springer-Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Chithambaram, K. Beard, and R. Barrera. “Skeletonizing polygons for map generalization,” in Technical papers, ACSM-ASPRS Convention, Cartography and GIS/LIS, Vol. 2, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Eppstein and J. Erickson. “Raising roofs, crashing cycles, and playing pool: applications of a data structure for finding pairwise interactions,” in SCG ’98: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 58–67, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Felkel and Š. Obdržálek. “Straight skeleton implementation,” in Proceedings of Spring Conference on Computer Graphics, Budmerice, Slovakia, pp. 210–218, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.C. Gonzalez and R.E. Woods. Digital Image Processing. 2nd edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Haala and C. Brenner. “Generation of 3d city models from airborne laser scanning data,” in Proceedings of 3rd EARSeL Workshop on Lidar Remote Sensing of Land and Sea, Tallinn, Estonia, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Penninga, E. Verbree, W. Quak, and P. van Oesterom. “Construction of the planar partition postal code map based on cadastral registration,” GeoInformatica, Vol. 9(2):181–204, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.A. Roberts, G. Brent Hall, and B. Boots. “Street centerline generation with an approximated area voronoi diagram,” in P.F. Fisher (Ed.), Developments in Spatial Data Handling, 11th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, 435–446, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Su, Z. Li, and G. Lodwick. “Morphological models for the collapse of area features in digital map generalization,” GeoInformatica, Vol. 2(4):359–382, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Tănase and R.C. Veltkamp. “A straight skeleton approximating the medial axis,” in S. Albers and T. Radzik (Eds.), Proc. 12th Eur. Symp. Algorithms (ESA 2004), number 3221 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 809–821, Springer-Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. van Oosterom. “The gap-tree, an approach to ‘on-the-fly’ map generalization of an area partitioning,” in J.-C. Müller, J.-P. Lagrange, and R. Weibel (Eds.), GIS and Generalization - Methodology and Practice, number 1 in GISDATA, chapter 9, pp. 120–132, Taylor & Francis, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz Universität Hannover, Institute of Cartography and GeoinformaticsHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations