Advertisement

GeoInformatica

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 117–142 | Cite as

One Way Distance: For Shape Based Similarity Search of Moving Object Trajectories

  • Bin LinEmail author
  • Jianwen Su
Article

Abstract

An interesting issue in moving object databases is to find similar trajectories of moving objects. Previous work on this topic focuses on movement patterns (trajectories with time dimension) of moving objects, rather than spatial shapes (trajectories without time dimension) of their trajectories. In this paper we propose a simple and effective way to compare spatial shapes of moving object trajectories. We introduce a new distance function based on “one way distance” (OWD). Algorithms for evaluating OWD in both continuous (piece wise linear) and discrete (grid representation) cases are developed. An index structure for OWD in grid representation, which guarantees no false dismissals, is also given to improve the efficiency of similarity search. Empirical studies show that OWD out-performs existent methods not only in precision, but also in efficiency. And the results of OWD in continuous case can be approximated by discrete case efficiently.

Keywords

moving objects trajectory similarity search one way distance index 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Supported in part by NSF grants IIS-0101134 and IIS-0415195.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Alt, C. Knauer, and C. Wenk. “Matching polygonal curves with respect to the frechet distance,” in Proc. Int. Sym. on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, pp. 63–74, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, and C. Wenk. “On map-matching vehicle tracking data,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 853–864, 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Brinkhoff. “Generating traffic data.” Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, Vol. 26(2):19–25, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Chan and W. Fu. “Efficient time series matching by wavelets,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Data Engineering, pp. 126–133, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Chen and R. Ng. “On the marriage of lp-norms and edit distance,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 792–803, 2004.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Chen, M. T. Ozsu, and V. Oria. “Robust and fast similarity search for moving object trajectories,” in Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pp. 491–502, 2005.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. de Berg, M.V. Krevel, M. Overmars, and O. Schwarzkopf. Computational Geometry Algorithms and Applications. Springer, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Faloutsos, M. Ranganathan, and Y. Manolopoulos. “Fast subsequence matching in time-series databases,” in Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pp. 419–429, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Keogh, K. Chakrabarti, M. Pazzani, and S. Mehrotra. “Locally adaptive dimensionality reduction for indexing large time series databases,” in Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pp. 151–162, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Keogh, T. Palpanas, V.B. Zordan, D. Gunopulos, and M. Cardle. “Indexing large human-motion databases,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 780–791, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.L. Lee, S.J. Chun, D.H. Kim, J.H. Lee, and C.W. Chung. “Similarity search for multidimensional data sequences,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Data Engineering, pp. 599–608, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.L. Little and Z. Gu. “Video retrieval by spatial and temporal structure of trajectories,” in Proc. of Symp. on Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Meratnia and R.A. de By. “Aggregation and comparison of trajectories,” in Proc. ACM Symp. on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pp. 49–54, 2002.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Ng and Y. Cai. “Indexing spatio-temporal trajectories with chebyshev polynomials,” in Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pp. 599–610, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. Pan. “Complexity of computations with matrices and polynomials,” in SIAM Review, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. Sakurai, M. Yoshikawa, and C. Faloutsos. FTW: “Fast similarity search under the time warping distance,” in Proc. ACM Symp. on Principles of Database Systems, pp. 326–337, 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Sankoff and J.B. Kruskal. Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparisons. Addison-Wesley, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Vlachos, D. Gunopulos, and G. Das. “Rotation invariant distance measures for trajectories,” in Proc. of SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 707–712, 2004.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Vlachos, G. Kollios, and D. Gunopulos. “Discovering similar multidimensional trajectories,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Data Engineering, pp. 673–684, 2002.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Y. Yanagisawa, J. ichi Akahani, and T. Satoh. “Shape-based similarity query for trajectory of mobile objects,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Mobile Data Management, pp. 63–77, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations