Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Metadata Community Profiles for the Semantic Web

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metadata is needed to facilitate data sharing among geospatial information communities. Geographic Metadata Standards are available but tend to be general and complex in nature and also are not well suited to overcome semantic heterogeneities across vocabularies of different domains and user communities. Current formalizations of metadata standards are not flexible enough to allow reuse and extension of metadata specifications, in particular for Web based information systems. In order to address this problem we propose a methodology to create community specific metadata profiles for the Semantic Web by reusing metadata specifications and domain vocabularies encoded as resources for the Web. This ensures that these community profiles are semantically compatible so they can be used in Web based information systems. The ISO-19115:2003 geographic metadata standard is the most general standard available and is being used in conjunction with the Web Ontology Language as the expression medium to test the methodology for each one of the possible extensions documented in ISO-19115:2003. It is shown that it is possible to extend and reuse metadata specifications and vocabularies distributed in the Web using the Web Ontology Language, by utilizing the language's flexibility to create restrictions on inherit properties and to make interferences on web distributed resources. Examples from the area of Hydrology are provided to demonstrate the technical details of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Baclawski, M. Kokar, P. Kogut, L. Hart, J. Smith, J. Letkowski, and P. Emery. “Extending the unified modeling language for ontology development,” Software System Model, 1:1–15, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Batini, S. Ceri, and S.B. Navathe. “Conceptual database design,” The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. “The semantic web,” Scientific American, Vol. 184(5):34–43, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Bishr. “Overcoming the semantic and other barriers to GIS interoperability,” Geographic Information Science, Vol. 12(4):299–314, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. CHRONOS. “An information system for chronostratigraphy,” http://www.chronos.org/index.html, 2004.

  6. CLEANER. “Collaborative Large-Scale Engineering Analysis Network for Environmental Research,” in http://cleaner.ce.berkeley.edu/intro.php, 2004.

  7. Commission on Geosciences Environment and Resource CGER. “A data foundation for the national spatial data infrastructure,” National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Cranefield. “UML and the semantic web,” in Semantic Web Working Symposium, California, USA, in http://www.semanticweb.org/SWWS/program/full/paper1.pdf, 2001.

  9. CUAHSI. Consortium for the Advancement of the Hydrologic Sciences, Inc., in http://www.cuahsi.org/, 2004.

  10. DCMI. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, in http://dublincore.org/, 2004.

  11. Ecoinformatics. “EML—Ecological Markup Language,” in http://www.ecoinformatics.org/tools.html, 2003.

  12. M.J. Egenhofer. “Toward the semantic geospatial web,” in Tenth ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, ACM Press: McLean, VA, USA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Elmargarmid and C. Pu. “Guest editors' introduction to the special issue on heterogenous databases,” ACM Computing Surveys, 22:175–178, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. EPA, US Environmental Protection Agency, in http://www.epa.gov/, 2004.

  15. FGDC. “Content standard for digital geospatial metadata,” Washington, D.C., 1998.

  16. Y. Gil and V. Ratnakar. “TRELLIS: an interactive tool for capturing information analysis and decision making,” in A. Gómez-Pérez and V. Richard Benjamins (Eds.), Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web: 13th International Conference, EKAW 2002, Lecture in Computer Science, vol. 2473, pp. 37–42, Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Siguenza, Spain, 2002.

  17. T. Gruber. “A translation approach to portable ontology specification,” Knowledge Acquisition 5(2):199–220, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Hadzilakos, G. Halaris, M. Kavouras, M. Kokla, G. Panapoulos, I. Paraschakis, T. Sellis, L. Tsoulos, and M. Zervakis. “Interoperability and definition of a national standard for geospatial data: the case of the hellenic cadastre,” International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, Vol. 2(2):120–128, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Harvey, W. Kuhn, H. Pundt, and Y. Bishr. “Semantic interoperability: A central issue for sharing geographic information,” The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 33(2):213–232, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Helly, A.A.P. Koppers, and H. Staudigel. “Scalable models of data sharing in earth sciences,” Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst, Vol. 4(1):1010, doi:10.1029/2002GC000318, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Hendler. “XML and the Semantic Web XML,” Journal, October, 2002.

  22. J. Hunter and C. Lagoze. “Combining RDF and XML schemas to enhance interoperability between metadata application profiles,” in The Tenth International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 457–466, ACM Press: Hong Kong, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. IRIS. Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology, in http://www.iris.washington.edu/, 2004.

  24. A.K.M.S. Islam, L.E. Bermudez, and M. Piasecki. “Ontology for geographic information—Metadata (ISO 19115),” in http://loki.cae.drexel.edu/~wbs/ontology/, 2004.

  25. ISO. “Geographic information—Metadata,” 2003.

  26. D.R. Maidment. Arc hydro Gis for water resources. ESRI: California, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D.L. McGuinness. “Ontologies come of age.” Spinning the semantic Web. D. Fensel, J. Hendler, H. Lieberman and W. Wahlster. The MIT Press: London, England, 2003.

  28. NOAA. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, in http://www.noaa.gov/, 2004.

  29. NOKIS. North and Baltic Sea Coastal Information System. 2004.

  30. OASIS. http://www.oasis-open.org, 2004.

  31. OMG. “Meta-Object Facility MOF™,” version 1.4, in http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/mof.htm, 2002.

  32. OMG. “Unified modeling language specification,” http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/uml.htm, 2003.

  33. OMG. Object Management Group, in http://www.omg.org/, 2004.

  34. A.P. Sheth. “Changing focus on interoperability in information systems: From system, syntax, structures to semantics,” in M.F Goodchild, M.J. Egenhofer, R. Fegeas, and C. Cottman (Eds.), Interoperating Geographic Information Systems, 5–29, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. K. Stocks and J. Quinn. “Data technologies: geospatial data integration,” in W. Michener and P. Tooby (Eds.), Scalable Information Networks for the Environment (SINE). Report of an NSF-Sponsored Workshop, 23–29, San Diego Supercomputer Center, 2002.

  36. USGS. “Hydrologic Markup Language (HYDROML),” in http://water.usgs.gov/nwis_activities/XML/nwis_hml.htm, 2004.

  37. USGS. US Geological Survey, in http://www.usgs.gov/, 2004.

  38. W3C. “Extensible Markup Language (XML),” in http://www.w3.org/XML/, 2003.

  39. W3C. “Ontology Web Language (OWL),” in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/, 2004.

  40. W3C. “XML Linking Language(XLink),” in http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink/, 2004.

  41. W3C. “XML Path Language (XPath),” http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath, 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Architectural & Environmental Engineering, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Luis Bermudez & Michael Piasecki

Authors
  1. Luis Bermudez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Piasecki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Piasecki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bermudez, L., Piasecki, M. Metadata Community Profiles for the Semantic Web. Geoinformatica 10, 159–176 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-006-7577-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-006-7577-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation