Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Specifying and Implementing Constraints in GIS—with Examples from a Geo-Virtual Reality System

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Constraints are important elements of every modelling process, but until now they have been treated in an ad hoc manner, depending on the specific application domain and the capabilities of the tools used. In GIS and GeoVR applications, constraints are conditions which always have to be valid (true) within the model populated with real geographic object instances. This paper argues that constraints should form a systematic part of the object class definition, similar to other aspects of the definition, viz. attributes, methods and relationships. Also, the implementation of constraints in all GIS and GeoVR subsystems (at front-end, database and exchange (I/O) level) should be derived automatically from the constraints specified by the framework. The paper therefore puts forward a framework for modelling constraints comprising (1) a classification and clarification of constraints, (2) a formal description using the unified modelling language/object constraint language (UML/OCL) and (3) implementation characteristics. The components of the framework are illustrated and applied to SALIX-2, a geo-virtual reality (GeoVR) landscape modelling system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Bloemmen, A. Ligtenberg, R. van Lammeren, T. Hoogerwerf. “Approaches for the use of geo-visualisation in participatory planning processes—version 7.” PSPE project publication, Wageningen University, 2005, p. 26.

  2. L.L. Boyd. “CDM RuleFrame—the business rule implementation framework that saves you work”. Oracle Corporation, iDevelopment Center of Excellence, ODTUG Business Rules Symposium, 2001.

  3. E. Clementini, P. Di Felice, and P. van Oosterom. “A small set of formal topological relationships suitable for end-user interaction,” in SSD’93 (Ed.), Third International Symposium on Large Spatial Databases, Singapore, LNCS No. 692, Springer: Berlin Heidelberg New York, 277–295, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Cockcroft. “A taxonomy of spatial data integrity constraints,” GeoInformatica, Vol. 1(4):327–343, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Cockcroft. “The design and implementation of a repository for the management of spatial data integrity constraints,” GeoInformatica, Vol. 8(1):49–69, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F.C. Collins and J.L. Smith. “Taxonomy for error in GIS,” in R.G. Congalton (Ed.), Proceedings of the International symposium on spatial accuracy in natural resource data bases, “Unlocking the Puzzle,” American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 1–7, 1994.

  7. C.J. Date and Hugh Darwen. A Guide to the SQL Standard. 4th edition, Chapter 14, Addison-Wesley, 1997, pp. 197–218.

  8. M.J. Egenhofer. “A formal definition of binary topological relationships”. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Foundation of Data Organisation and Algorithms, pp. 457–472, Paris, 1989.

  9. ESRI. “Working with the geodatabase: powerful multi-user editing and sophisticated data integrity”. ESRI white paper, February 2002.

  10. M. Heim. Virtual Realism. Oxford University Press: New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G.J. Hunter. “Management issues in GIS: Accuracy and Data Quality,” in G.J. Hunter (Ed.), Proceedings: Conference on Managing Geographic Information Systems for Success, pp. 95–101, Aurisa: Melbourne, Australia, 1996.

  12. Y-M. Kwon, E. Ferrari, and E. Bertino. “Modelling spatio-temporal constraints for multimedia objects,” Data & Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 30:217–238, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. van Lammeren et al. “Virtual Reality in the landscape design process,” in D. Ogrin, I. Marusic, and T. Simanic (EDs.), Landscape Planning in the Era of Globalisation, - [S.l.]: [s.n.], pp. 158–165, 2002.

  14. Laser-Scan Technical Product Description—Topology Users Guide. Cambridge, UK, 2003.

  15. J.H. Louwsma. “Constraints in geo-information models. Applied to geo-VR in landscape architecture”. MSc thesis in Geodetic Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2004.

  16. S. Muller. “CDM RuleFrame Overview: 6 reasons to get framed!” Oracle Corporation, iDevelopment Center of Excellence, 2002.

  17. OGC, Open GIS Consortium, Inc., “OpenGIS Simple Features Specification For SQL, Revision 1.1.” OpenGIS Project Document 99-049, 1999.

  18. OMG, Object Management Group. “Unified Modeling Language Specification (Action Semantics), UML 1.4 with action semantics,” January 2002.

  19. Oracle. “Oracle 9i JDBC Developer’s Guide and Reference, release 2 (9.2),” Part No. A96654-01, March 2002. Chapter 3—Basic Features, Chapter 7—Accessing and Manipulating Oracle Data.

  20. Oracle, “Oracle Spatial Topology and Network Data Models, 10g Release 1 (10.1),” 2003.

  21. D. Papadias and Y. Theodoridis. “Spatial relations, minimum bounding rectangles and spatial data structures,” International Journal of GIS, Vol. 11(2):111–138, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.J. Peuquet. “It’s about time: a conceptual framework for the representation of temporal dynamics in GIS,” in W. Kuhn and P. Haunold (Eds.), Temporal Data in Geographic Information Systems, pp. 149–170, 1995.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Waterschap Roer en Overmaas, Parklaan 10, 6131 KG, Sittard, The Netherlands

    Jildou Louwsma

  2. GIS Technology Research Group, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 9, 2628 BX, Delft, The Netherlands

    Sisi Zlatanova & Peter van Oosterom

  3. Centre for Geo-Information, Wageningen University, P. O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Ron van Lammeren

Authors
  1. Jildou Louwsma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sisi Zlatanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ron van Lammeren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter van Oosterom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron van Lammeren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Louwsma, J., Zlatanova, S., van Lammeren, R. et al. Specifying and Implementing Constraints in GIS—with Examples from a Geo-Virtual Reality System. Geoinformatica 10, 531–550 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-006-0345-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-006-0345-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation