The effects of diameter and location of drain pipes on the uplift force and exit hydraulic gradient for a gravity dam are investigated. A numerical model of a gravity dam is simulated using the finite element method. The results indicate that drain pipes under a gravity dam reduce the uplift force and exit hydraulic gradient. The optimal location of the drain pipe with respect to reducing uplift force is 0.25 L (where L is the dam width) from the dam heel, and is 0.75 L with respect to the exit hydraulic gradient. In addition, with increasing drain depth, the uplift force first decreases and then increases. The drain pipe diameter has little effect on uplift force and exit hydraulic gradient and thus its selection should depend on other considerations. When the drain pipe is located at its optimum location with respect to minimizing the uplift force, the volume of dam materials is reduced ~ 30–50%.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aquifer thickness (m)
The width of dam crest (m)
The depth of pervious layer (m)
Drain diameter (m)
Gravity acceleration (m/s2)
Water head (m)
- Kx, Ky, Kz :
Hydraulic conductivity of porous medium along X, Y, Z
Height of upstream water (m)
- Hdam :
Dam height (m)
Width of dam (m)
Discharge per unit length of dam (m2/s)
Walls distance (m)
Dam volume (m3)
- Xi :
Longitudinal position of drains
- Yi :
Depth of drains
- s :
Specific density of concrete (2.4 ton/m3) and
- w :
Specific density of water (1 ton/m3
Azizi S, Salmasi F, Abbaspour A, Arvanaghi H (2012) Weep hole and cut-off effect in decreasing of uplift pressure (case study: Yusefkand Mahabad diversion dam. J Civ Eng Urban 2(3):97–101
Bolève A, Janod F, Revil A, Lafon A, Fryd JJ (2011) Localization and quantification of leakages in dams using time-lapse self-potential measurements associated with salt tracer injection. J Hydrol 403(3–4):242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.008
Chang DTT, Wu JY, Nieh YC (1996) Use of geosynthetics in the uplift pressure relief system for a raft foundation. Recent developments in geotextile filters and prefabricated drainage, geocomposites. ASTM Spec Tech Publ 128:196–221. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP15601S
Chawla AS, Nathi M (1979) Uplift pressures on hollow gravity dams. Hydraul Division, ASCE 105(3):257–273
Chawla AS, Thakur RK, Kumar A (1990) Optimum location of drain in concrete dams. Energy Eng, ASCE. 116(7):930–943
Chen Y, Zhou C, Zheng H (2008) A numerical solution to seepage problems with complex drainage systems. Comput Geotech 35(3):383–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.08.005
Devey RR, Reich RW, Saouma VE (1994) Uplift modeling for fracture mechanics analysis of concrete dams. J Struct Eng ASCE 120(10):3025–3044
Ebeling RM, Nuss FT, Brand B (2000) Evaluation and comparison of stability analysis and uplift criteria for concrete gravity dams three federal agencies. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington US
Geo-Studio (2012). Version 8.15.11236, User Manual. GEOSLOPE International, Calgary, in, Alberta, Canada.
Hekmatzadeha AA, Zareia F, Joharia A, Torabi Haghighi A (2018) Reliability analysis of stability against piping and sliding in diversion dams, considering four cutoff wall configurations. Comput Geotech 98:217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.02.019
Himanshu N, Burman A (2017) Seepage and stability analysis of Durgawati Earthen Dam: a case study. Indian Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0283-1
Jafari F, Salmasi F, Abraham J (2019) Numerical investigation of granular filter under the bed of a canal. Appl Water Sci 9(137):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1023-8
Kumar V, Samui P, Burman A, Himanshu N (2019) Reliability based slope stability analysis of Durgawati Earthen Dam considering steady and transient state seepage condition using MARS and RVM. Indian Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-019-00373-7
Liang Y, Yeh TCJ, Wang J, Liu M, Zha Y, Hao Y (2017) An auto-adaptive moving mesh method for the numerical simulation of piping erosion. Comput Geotech 82:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.10.011
Mansuri B, Salmasi F, Oghati B (2014) Effect of location and angle of cutoff wall on uplift pressure in diversion dam. Geotech Geol Eng 32(4):1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9774-3
Nasr RI, Zeydan BA, Bakhry MF, Saloom MS (2003) Uplift pressure relief on lined canals using tile drains. Alexandria Eng 42(4):497–507
Nguyen HV, Nieber JL, Ritsema CJ, Dekker LW, Steenhuis TS (1999) Modeling gravity driven unstable flow in a water repellent soil. J Hydrol 215(1–4):202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00269-8
Norouzi R, Salmasi F, Arvanaghi H (2020) Uplift pressure and hydraulic gradient in Sabalan Dam. Appl Water Sci 10(111):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01195-2
Pakbaz MS, Dardaei A, Salahshoor J (2009) Evaluation of performance of plastic concert cutoff wall in Karkheh dam using 3-D Seepage analysis and measurement. J Appl Sci 9(4):724–730. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2009.724.730
Ransford RK (1972). Uplift computations for Masonry Dams, in, La Houille Blanche.
Raymond R, Ronald W, Victor E (1994) Uplift modeling for fracture mechanics analysis of concrete dams. J Struct Eng ASCE 120(10):3025–3044
Ruggeri G (2004) Uplift Pressures under Concrete Dams-Final Report. ICOLD European Club
Salmasi F, Nouri M (2017) Effect of upstream semi-impervious blanket of embankment dams on seepage. ISH J Hydraul Eng 25(2):143–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2017.1381862
Salmasi F, Mansuri B, Raoufi A (2015) Use of numerical simulation to measure the effect of relief wells for decreasing uplift in a homogeneous Earth Dam. Civ Eng Infrastruct J 48(1):35–45. https://doi.org/10.7508/CEIJ.2015.01.004
Salmasi F, Khatibi R, Nourani B (2017) Investigating reduction of uplift forces by longitudinal drains with underlined canals. ISH J Hydraul Eng 23(1):57–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2017.1350605
Salmasi F, Nouri M, Abraham J (2020a) Upstream cutoff and downstream filters to control of seepage in dams. Water Resour Manage 34:4271–4288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02674-6
Salmasi F, Norouzi R, Abraham J, Nourani B, Samadi S (2020b) Effect of inclined clay core on embankment dam seepage and stability through LEM and FEM. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01455-7
Sartipi N, Salmasi F, Abraham J, Hosseinzadeh Dalir A (2020) Investigation of the effect of depth and distance between cutoff walls on uplift force for gravity dams. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02867-x
Varshney RS (1982) Concrete dams. Oxford and IBH Publishing CO, New Delhi
Yuan S, Zhong H (2016) Three dimensional analysis of unconfined seepage in earth dams by the weak form quadrature element method. J Hydrol 533:403–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.034
This paper is the outcome of a research project supported by the University of Tabriz research affairs office.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Aghdam, A.T., Salmasi, F., Abraham, J. et al. Effect of Drain Pipes on Uplift Force and Exit Hydraulic Gradient and the Design of Gravity Dams Using the Finite Element Method. Geotech Geol Eng (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01699-x
- Gravity dam
- Uplift force
- Drain pipe
- Exit hydraulic gradient
- Finite elements method