Acoustic Emission Investigation on Crack Propagation Mode of Sandstone During Brazil Splitting Process

Abstract

In the present work, the Brazilian tests for six sandstone samples were carried out. The acoustic emission (AE) method was applied to analyze the characteristics of the crack propagating mode and further to classify the cracking mode during the whole sandstone lump Brazilian splitting process. The study results showed that the AE event produced during the whole loading process, and different loading stages demonstrate different AE features. The amplitude of AE signals was increasing along with the loading stress, and there is a period of quiet time before the failure of the sample. It also concluded that more than 99% of the whole cracking signals are classified as tensile mode, and there are precious few shear cracks that occurred during the Brazilian test; the central frequency of the occurrence of the tensile crack is 138.58 kHz.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Data Availability Statement

The data are available and explained in this article, readers can access the data supporting the conclusions of this study.

References

  1. Aggelis DG, Shiotani T, Terazawa M (2010) Assessment of construction joint effect in full-scale concrete beams by acoustic emission activity. J Eng Mech 136(7):906–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cai M, Kaiser PK (2007) FLAC/PFC coupled numerical simulation of AE in large-scale underground excavations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44(4):550–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpinteri A, Cardone F, Lacidogna G (2010) Energy emissions from failure phe-nomena: mechanical, electromagnetic, nuclear. Exp Mech 50:1235–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen G, Xu P, Mi G et al (2019) Compressive strength and cracking of composite concrete in hot-humid environments based on microscopic quantitative analysis[J]. Construct Build Mater 225(20):441–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Das AK, Suthar D, Leung CKY (2019) Machine learning based crack mode classification from unlabeled acoustic emission waveform features[J]. Cem Concr Res 121:42–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eberhardt E (1997) Changes in acoustic event properties with progressive fracture damage. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:3–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Farnam Y (2015) Weiss, et al. Acoustic emission waveform characterization of crack origin and mode in fractured and ASR damaged concrete[J]. Cement Concrete Compos

  8. Fu JH, Huang BX, Liu CY, Yang W, Wang LF (2011) Study on acoustic emission features of coal sample Brazilian splitting. Coal Sci Technol 4(39):25–28

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lei R, Zhang Z, Ge Z, et al. (2020) Deformation localization and cracking processes of sandstone containing two flaws of different geometric arrangements[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures

  10. Gu A, Luo Y, Xu B (2015) Characteristic identification of cracking acoustic emission signals in concrete beam based on hilbert-huang transform[C]//Springer in Physics. Springer Proceedings in Physics

  11. Gu Q, Ma Q, Tan Y et al (2019) Acoustic emission characteristics and damage model of cement mortar under uniaxial compression[J]. Construct Build Mater 213(20):377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardy HR (1997) Emergence of acoustic emission/microseismic activity as a tool in geomechanics. In: Proceedings of the First Conference on Acoustic Emission/Microseismic Activity in Geologic Structures and Materials, University Park. Edited by H.R. Hardy and L.W. Leighton, Trans Tech Puplications, Clausthal Zellerfeld, pp 3–31

  13. Hatheway AW (2009) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring; 1974-2006[J]. Environ Eng Geoence 15(1):47–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hawkins AB, Ulusay R, Hudson JA (2009) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterisation, testing and monitoring[J]. Bull Eng Geol Environ

  15. Joseph FL (2001) Acoustic emission at failure in quasi-brittle materials. Constr Build Mater 15:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kong B, Wang E, Li Z et al (2017) Acoustic emission signals frequency-amplitude characteristics of sandstone after thermal treated under uniaxial compression[J]. J Appl Geophys 136:190–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurz JH, Finck F, Grosse CU, Reinhardt HW (2006) Stress drop and stress redis-tribution in concrete quantified over time by the b-value analysis. Struct Health Monit 5:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo PH, Yu XB, Deng Q (2010) Acoustic emission study of Rocks under Brizilian test. Nonferrous Metals 62(2):44–48

    Google Scholar 

  19. Matikas TE (2008) Influence of material processing and interface on the fiber frag-mentation process in titanium matrix composites. Compos Interfaces 15(4):363–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miaomiao W, Chengxuan T, Jing M et al (2017) Crack classification and evolution in anisotropic shale during cyclic loading tests by acoustic emission[J]. J Geophys Eng 4:4

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ohno K, Ohtsu M (2010) Crack classification in concrete based on acoustic emission. Constr Build Mater 24(12):2339–2346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Poddar B, Giurgiutiu V (2017) Detectability of crack lengths from acoustic emissions using physics of wave propagation in plate structures[J]. J Nondestr Eval 36(2):41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prem PR, Murthy AR (2016) Acoustic emission monitoring of reinforced concrete beams subjected to four-point-bending[J]. Appl Acoust, S0003682X16302316

  24. Ranjith PG (2008) A study of effect of displacement rate and moisture content on the mechanical properties of concrete: use of acoustic emission. Mech Mater 40:453–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shiotani T (2001) Detection and evaluation of AE waves due to rock deformation. Constr Build Mater 15:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shipeng X (2019) Numerical simulation research of failure and acoustic emission characteristics of parallel fractured sandstone[J]. Safety Coal Mines

  27. Tang SF (2010) Characteristics of acoustic emission signals in damp cracking coal rocks. Mining Sci Technol 20:0143–0147

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tra V, Kim J Y, Jeong I, et al. (2020) An acoustic emission technique for crack modes classification in concrete structures[J]. Sustainability, p 12

  29. Wang XT, Ge HK, Song LL, He TM, Xin W (2011) Experimental study of two types of rock sample acoustic emission events and kaiser effect point recognition approach. Chin J Roc Mech Eng 3(30):580–588

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yue JG, Kunnath SK, Xiao Y (2020) Uniaxial concrete tension damage evolution using acoustic emission monitoring[J]. Constr Build Mater 232:117281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou JW, Xu WY, Yang XG (2010) A microcrack damage model for brittle rocks under uniaxial compression. Mech Res Commun 37:399–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu WC, Huang ZP, Tang CA, Feng MZ (2004) Numerical simulation on failure process of pre-cracked Brazilian disk specimen of rock. Rock Soil Mech 10(25):1609–1612

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by theYouth Science and Technology Talent Growth Project of Guizhou Provincial Education Department ([2020]155), Research and development project of Guizhou University of Engineering Science (Grant No: G2018016), Technology top talent support project of Guizhou Provincial Education Department ([2017]098), and Technology platform and talent team plan project ([2018]5622).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiongqiong Tang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exists in the submission of this manuscript, and the manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Cui, X., Tang, Q. et al. Acoustic Emission Investigation on Crack Propagation Mode of Sandstone During Brazil Splitting Process. Geotech Geol Eng (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01660-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sandstone
  • Brazilian splitting
  • Acoustic emission
  • Crack growth
  • Frequency