Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Liquefaction Resistance of Sandy Soils from Undrained Cyclic Triaxial Tests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent earthquakes frequently showed liquefaction of sandy soils. In these case one of the major challenges is the assessment of the residual strength of liquefied soil. Laboratory researches have clearly indicated that liquefaction susceptibility depend on many factors including soil grain size distribution, effective confining stresses and applied stress path in terms of cyclic shear stress amplitude. The complex cyclic shear stress path experienced by the soil during an earthquake can be reproduced in laboratory only by using sophisticated testing apparatuses. Cyclic triaxial tests have been widely used to asses soil liquefaction potential especially for coarse-grained soils, as in this study. In the framework of the design for the seismic retrofitting of the “Viadotto Ritiro” foundations along the A20 motorway connecting Messina with Palermo, a soil liquefaction study has been carried out. With this aim, a detailed geological and geotechnical characterization of the area has been performed by in situ and laboratory tests including the combined resonant column and torsional shear test and undrained cyclic triaxial tests (CTX). In particular, the paper presents the results of CTX, carried out on isotropically consolidated specimens carried out on specimens of a sandy soil to asses liquefaction strength. The results are plotted in terms of deviator stress q versus axial strain εa, cyclic stress ratio CSR and axial strain εa versus number of cycles Ncyc, effective mean stress p′ versus deviator stress q, cyclic stress ratio CSR and pore pressure ratio Ru versus number of cycles Ncyc. The results show that the cyclic resistance increases with the decrease in the initial confining stress and decreases as the silt content increases and confirme that the coarsest material has a lower tendency to liquefy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Castelli F, Lentini V (2013) Landsliding events triggered by rainfalls in the Enna area (South Italy). Proc. Second World Landslide Forum 2:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelli F, Lentini V (2017) Dynamic characterization of municipal solid waste by in situ and laboratory tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001641

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelli F, Lentini V, Maugeri M (2013) Stability analysis of landfills in seismic area. In: Proceedings of the geo-congress 2103, ASCE geotechnical special publication, no. 231, stability and performance of slopes and embankments, p 1226–1239

  • Castelli F, Lentini V, Trifarò CA (2016a) 1D seismic analysis of earth dams: the example of the Lentini site. In: Proceedings of the VI Italian conference of researchers in geotechnical engineering-geotechnical engineering in multidisciplinary research: from microscale to regional scale, CNRIG2016. Procedia engineering, vol 158, p 356–361

  • Castelli F, Castellano E, Contino F, Lentini V (2016b) A web-based GIS system for landslide risk zonation: the case of Enna area (Italy). In: Proceeding of the 12th international symposium on landslides, Napoli, Italy

  • Castelli F, Lentini V, Grasso S (2017a) Recent developments for the seismic risk assessment. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0163-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelli F, Lentini V, Maugeri M (2017b) Dynamic characterisation of municipal solid waste by SDMT. Environ Geotech J 4(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1680/envgeo.13.00121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli F, Freni G, Lentini V, Fichera A (2017c) Modelling of a debris flow event in the Enna area for hazard assessment. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on the material point method, MPM 2017, Delft, January 10–13, 2017. Procedia engineering, vol 175, p 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.026

  • de Silva F, Sica S, Silvestri F, Aversa S (2016) Estimation of the ground shaking from the response of rigid bodies. In: Anzidei M, Pondrelli S (eds) The Amatrice seismic sequence: preliminary data and results. Ann Geophys 59(5)

  • Facciorusso J, Madiai C, Vannucchi G (2016) The 2012 Emilia earthquake (Italy): geotechnical characterization and ground response analyses of the paleo-Reno river levees. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 86:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flora A, Lirer S, Silvestri F (2012) Undrained cyclic resistance of undisturbed gravelly soil. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 43(12):366–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs HJ, Holtz WG (1957) Research on determining the density of sands by spoon penetration testing. In: Proceeding of 4th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 1. London, pp 35–39

  • Grasso S, Castelli F, Massimino MR, Lentini V (2016) In situ measurements for evaluating liquefaction potential under cyclic loading. In: Proceeding of the 1st IMEKO TC-4 international workshop on metrology for geotechnics, Benevento, Italy, p 79–84

  • Huang T, Huang A, Kuo Y, Tsai M (2004) A laboratory study on the undrained strength of a silty sand from Central Western Taiwan. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(9–10):733–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyodo M, Tanimizu H, Yasufuku N, Fujii T (1991) Undrained cyclic shear strength and residual shear strain of saturated sand by cyclic triaxial tests. Soils Found 31(3):60–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiara K (1996) Soil behavior in earthquake geotechnics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Mayne PW (1990) Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Electric Power Research institute, EL-6800, Research Project 1493-6

  • Marsal RJ (1967) Large scale testing of rockfill materials. J Soil Mech Found Eng ASCE 93(2):27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaco P, Totani G, Totani F, Grasso S, Maugeri M (2011) Site effects and site amplification due to the 2009 Abruzzo earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on earthquake resistant engineering structures, WIT transactions on the built environment, vol 120, p 29–40

  • Monaco P, Totani G, Amoroso S, Totani F, Marchetti D (2013) Site characterization by seismic dilatometer (SDMT) in the city of L’Aquila. Riv Ital Geotec 3:8–22

    Google Scholar 

  • NTC (2008) Norme tecniche per le costruzioni-D.M. 14 Gennaio 2008

  • Pino NA, Giardini D, Boschi E (2000) The December 28, 1908, Messina Straits, southern Italy, earthquake: waveform modeling of regional seismograms. J Geophys Res 105(B11):25473–25492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino NA, Piatanesi A, Valensise G, Boschi E (2009) The 28 December 1908 Messina Straits earthquake (Mw 7.1): a great earthquake throughout a century of seismology. Seismol Res Lett 80:243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Wride CE (1998) Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 35(4):442–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santucci de Magistris F, d’Onofrio A, Evangelista L, Foti S, Maraschini M, Monaco P, Amoroso S, Totani G, Lanzo G, Pagliaroli A, Madiai C, Simoni G, Silvestri F (2013) Geotechnical characterization of the Aterno valley for site response analyses. Riv Ital Geotec 3:23–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawada S, Takeshima Y, Mikami T (2003) Effect of K0-condition on liquefaction characteristics of saturated sand. In: Taylor & Francis (eds) Deformation characteristics of geo-materials, chapter 65. Taylor & Francis, pp 511–517

  • Seed HB, Lee KL (1966) Liquefaction of saturated sands during cyclic loading. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 92(6):105–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Skempton AW (1986) Standard penetration tests procedures & the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, ageing and overconsolidation. Géotechnique 36(3):425–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sladen JA, D’Hollander RD, Krahn J (1985) The liquefaction of sands, a collapse surface approach. Can Geotech J 22:564–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toki S, Tatsukoa F, Miura S, Yoshimi Y, Yasuda S, Makihara Y (1986) Cyclic undrained triaxial strength of sand by a cooperative test program. Soils Found 26(3):117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaid YP, Sivathayalan S (1996) Static and cyclic liquefaction potential of Fraser Delta sand in simple shear and triaxial tests. Can Geotech J 33(2):281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaid YP, Chern J, Tumi H (1985) Confining pressure, grain angularity and liquefaction. J Geotech Eng 111(10):1229–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaid YP, Stedman JD, Sivathayalan S (2001) Confining stress and static shear stress in cyclic liquefaction. Can Geotech J 38(3):580–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimi Y, Tokimatsu K, Kaneko O, Makihara Y (1984) Undrained cyclic shear strength of dense Nigata sand. Soils Found 24(4):131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, University of Enna Kore, Via delle Olimpiadi, 94100, Enna, Italy

    Valentina Lentini & Francesco Castelli

Authors
  1. Valentina Lentini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesco Castelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentina Lentini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lentini, V., Castelli, F. Liquefaction Resistance of Sandy Soils from Undrained Cyclic Triaxial Tests. Geotech Geol Eng 37, 201–216 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0603-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0603-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation