Prediction of Engineering Properties of Basalt Rock in Jordan Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test

Original Paper

Abstract

Basalt is an extrusive igneous rock derived from Lava and spread over different localities in Jordan. It can be used in industrial applications, and as construction materials. Before using basalt, it is essential to determine its dry density, porosity, uniaxial compressive strength, and Brazilian tensile strength. The testing procedure and sample preparation used to determine the engineering properties are time-consuming and need expertise. Hence, the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) test, a quick and non-destructive evaluation method, was used to determine the engineering properties. Empirical relationships for determination of dry density, porosity, uniaxial compressive strength, Brazilian tensile strength, and tangent modulus of elasticity were deduced. Good correlation coefficients (R2 = 0.832–0.929) were obtained between UPV and dry density, porosity, uniaxial compressive strength, Brazilian tensile strength and modulus of elasticity. These correlations were limited to intact basalt with UPV ≥ 4000 m/s.

Keywords

Dry density Porosity Uniaxial compressive strength Brazilian tensile strength Ultrasonic pulse velocity Nondestructive methods 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr. Saleem Hatamleh and Mr. Mohammad Shafique of Civil Engineering Laboratories at Hashemite University for their help in carrying out the experimental tests.

References

  1. Aliabdo AAE, Elmoaty AEMA (2012) Reliability of using nondestructive tests to estimate compressive strength oh building stones and bricks. Alex Eng J 51(3):193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altindag R (2012) Correlation between P-wave velocity and some mechanical properties for sedimentary rocks. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 112:229–237Google Scholar
  3. ASTM (2011) Standard method for laboratory determination of pulse velocities and ultrasonic elastic constants of rocks. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM C-128-15 (2015) Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of fine aggregate. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM C-170/C170M2-016 (2016) Standard test method for compressive strength of dimension stone. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM D-2845-00 (2000) Standard test method for laboratory determination of pulse velocities and ultrasonic elastic constants of rock. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  7. ASTM D-3967-016 (2016) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of intact rock core specimens. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  8. Azadan P, Ahangari K (2014) Evaluation of the new dynamic needle penetrometer in estimating uniaxial compressive strength of weak rocks. Arab J Geosci 7:3205–3216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-0921-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Azimian A, Ajalloeian R, Fatehi L (2013) An empirical correlation of uniaxial compressive strength with P-wave velocity and point load strength index on marly rocks using statistical method. Geotech Geol Eng 32:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Basu A, Ghosh N, Da M (2012) Categorizing weathering grades of quartzite materials and assessing Brazilian tensile strength with reference to assigned grades. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 49:148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cai M (2010) Practical estimates of tensile strength and Hoek–Brown strength parameter mi of brittle rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:167–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Canbay MM, Kurtulus C, Ramazzanoglu S (2016) Evaluation of mechanical and engineering properties of volcanic rocks. Tech Gaz 23(3):737–740Google Scholar
  13. Chen X, Schmitt DR, Kessler JA, Evans J, Kofman R (2015) Empirical relations between ultrasonic P-wave velocity, porosity and uniaxial compressive strength. In: Proceedings of official publication of the Canadian society of exploration geophysicists, vol 40, p 5Google Scholar
  14. Choi G, Seungcheol B (2014) Predicting the uniaxial compressive strength and Young’s modulus of rocks using ultrasonic velocity. J Korean Geoenviron Soc 15:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. Technical report. Air Force Weapons Lab., New Mexico. AFWL-TR-65-116Google Scholar
  16. Diamantis K, Bellas S, Migiros G, Gartzos E (2011) Correlating wave velocities with physical, mechanical properties and petro graphic characteristics of peridotites from the central Greece. Geotech Geol Eng 29:1049–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ersoy H, Kanik D (2012) Multi criteria decision-making analysis based methodology for predicting carbonate rocks’ uniaxial compressive strength. Earth Sci Res J 16:65–74Google Scholar
  18. Evans JD (1996) Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole Publishing, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
  19. Fakir M, Ferentinou M, Misra S (2017) An investigation into the rock properties influencing the strength in some granitoid rocks of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Geotech Geol Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0168-1 Google Scholar
  20. Francisco M, Graça V, Tiago M (2014) The performance of ultrasonic pulse velocity on the prediction of tensile granite behaviour: a study based on artificial neural networks. In: 9th international masonry conference in Guimarães, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  21. Heap MJ, Lavallee Y, Petrakova L, Baud P, Reushcle T, Varley NR, Dingwell DB (2014) Microstructural controls on the physical and mechanical properties of edifice-forming andesites at Volcán de Colima Mexico. J Geophys Res 119:2925–2963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heidari M, Khanlari GR, Torabi M, Kargarian S (2011) Predicting the uniaxial compressive and tensile strengths of gypsum rock by point load testing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ibrahim K (1993) The geological framework for the Harrat Ash-Shaam basaltic super-group and its volcano tectonic evolution. Natural Resources Authority Jordan, Amman, p 33Google Scholar
  24. Ibrahim K, Rabba I, Tarawneh K (2001) Geological and mineral occurrences map of the Northeastern Badia Region, Jordan. The Higher Council for Science and Technology and Natural Resources Authority Jordan, Amman, p 13Google Scholar
  25. ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods. International Society for Rock Mechanics, ISRM Turkish National Group, Ankara, p 628Google Scholar
  26. Jaeger JC, Cook NGW, Zimmerman R (2007) Fundamentals of rock mechanics. Wiley, Malden, p 335Google Scholar
  27. Juneja A, Endait M (2017) Laboratory measurement of elastic waves in Basalt rock. Meas J Int Meas Confed 103:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kahraman S, Yeken T (2008) Determination of physical properties of carbonate rocks from P-wave velocity. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:277–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kallu R, Roghanchi P (2015) Correlations between direct and indirect strength test methods. Int J Min Sci Technol 25(3):355–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karakuş A, Akatay M (2013) Determination of basic physical and mechanical properties of basaltic rocks from P-wave velocity. Nondestruct Test Eval 28:342–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khandelwal M (2013) Correlating P-wave velocity with the physico-mechanical properties of different rocks. Pure appl Geophys 170:507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khandelwal M, Ranjith PG (2010) Correlating index properties of rocks with P-wave measurements. J Appl Geophys 71:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2009) Correlating static properties of coal measures rocks with p-wave velocity. Int J Coal Geol 79:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kurtulus G, Irmak T, Sertcelik I (2011) Physical and mechanical properties of Gokcseda: Imbros (NE Aegean Sea) Island andesites. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69:321–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moradian Z, Behnia M (2009) Predicting the uniaxial compressive strength and static Young’s modulus of intact sedimentary rock using the ultrasonic test. Int J Geomech 9(1):14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oghenero OA (2012) Acoustic velocity properties of Danian limestone section exposed at the Curfs Quarry, Southeastern Netherlands. J Geol Min Res 4:65–74Google Scholar
  37. Ozcelik Y, Bayram F, Yasitli NE (2013) Prediction of engineering properties of rocks from microscopic data. Arab J Geosci 6:3651–3668.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0625-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rahmouni A, Boulanouar A, Boukalouch M, Géraud Y, Samaouali A, Harnafi M, Sebbani J (2013) Prediction of porosity and density of calcarenite rocks from P-wave velocity measurements. Int J Geosci 4:1292–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rajabzadeh MA, Moosavinasab Z, Rakhshandehroo G (2011) Effects of rock classes and porosity on the relation between uniaxial compressive strength and some rock properties for carbonate rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sarkar K, Vishal V, Singh TN (2012) An empirical correlation of index geo mechanical parameters with the compressional wave velocity. Geotech Geol Eng 30:469–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shalabi F, Cording EJ, Al-Hattamleh OH (2007) Estimation of rock engineering properties using hardness tests. Eng Geol 90:138–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sharma PK, Singh TN (2008) A correlation between P-wave velocity, impact strength index, slake durability index and uniaxial compressive strength. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharma PK, Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2011) A correlation between Schmidt hammer rebound numbers with impact strength index, slake durability index and P-wave velocity. Int J Earth Sci 100:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Singh TN, Kripamoy S (2005) Geotechnical investigation of Amiyan landslide hazard zone in Himalayan region, Uttaranchal, India. In: Proceedings, Singapore geotechnical engineering for disaster mitigation and rehabilitation conference, pp 355–360Google Scholar
  45. Singh PK, Tripathy A, Kainthola A, Bankim M, Sing V, Singh TN (2017) Indirect estimation of compressive and shear strength from simple index tests. Eng Comput 33:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-016-0451-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siratovich PA, Heap MJ, Villenueve MC, Cole JW, Reuschlé T (2014) Physical property relationships of the Rotokawa Andesite, a significant geothermal reservoir rock in the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. Geotherm Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-014-0010-4 Google Scholar
  47. Tandon RS, Gupta V (2013) The control of mineral constituents and textural characteristics on the petro physical and mechanical (PM) properties of different rocks of the Himalaya. Eng Geol 153:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tandon RS, Gupta V (2015) Estimation of strength characteristics of different Himalayan rocks from Schmidt hammer rebound, point load index, and compression wave velocity. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74:521–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tarawneh K, Ilani S, Rabba I, Harlavan Y, Peltz S, Ibrahim K (2000) Dating of the Harrat Ash Shaam basalts North Jordan, phase 1. Natural Resources Authority Jordan, Amman, p 59Google Scholar
  50. Vajdova V, Prikry R, Pros Z, Klima K (1999) The effect rock fabric on P-wave velocity distribution in amphibolites. Phys Earth Planet Inter 114:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vasanelli E, Colangiuli D, Calia A, Sileo M, Aiello MA (2015) Ultrasonic pulse velocity for the evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of a highly porous building limestone. Ultrason J 60:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vasconcelos G, Lourenço PB, Alves CSA, Pamplona J (2007) Prediction of the mechanical properties of granites by ultrasonic pulse velocity and Schmidt hammer hardness. In: Proceedings, 10th North American masonry conference, pp 981–991Google Scholar
  53. Yagiz S (2011) P-wave velocity test for assessment of geotechnical properties of some rock materials. Bull Mater Sci 34:947–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yasar E, Erdogan Y (2004) Correlating sound velocity with density, compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:871–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering Department, College of EngineeringThe Hashemite UniversityZarqaJordan

Personalised recommendations