Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Settlement of Shallow Foundations on Cohesionless Soils Based on SPT Value Using Multi-Objective Feature Selection

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate prediction of settlement for shallow footings on cohesionless soil is a complex geotechnical problem due to large uncertainties associated with soil. Prediction of the settlement of shallow footings on cohesionless soil is based on in situ tests as it is difficult to find out the properties of soil in the laboratory and standard penetration test (SPT) is the most often used in situ test. In data driven modelling, it is very difficult to choose the optimal input parameters, which will govern the model efficiency along with a better generalization. Feature subset selection involves minimization of both prediction error and the number of features, which are in general mutual conflicting objectives. In this study, a multi-objective optimization technique is used, where a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA II) is combined with a learning algorithm (neural network) to develop a prediction model based on SPT data based on the Pareto optimal front. Pareto optimal front gives the user freedom to choose a model in terms of accuracy and model complexity. It is also shown how NSGA II can be effectively applied to select the optimal parameters and besides minimizing the error rate. The developed model is compared with existing models in terms of different statistical criteria and found to be more efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Ani A, Alsukker A, Khushaba RN (2013) Feature subset selection using differential evolution and a wheel based search strategy. Swarm Evolut Comput 9:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach FR (2008) Bolasso: model consistent lasso estimation through the bootstrap. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on machine learning, pp 33–40

  • Cervante L, Xue B, Zhang M, Shang L (2012) Binary particle swarm optimisation for feature selection: a filter based approach. In: IEEE Congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), pp 881–888

  • Chen Y, Azzam R, Fernandez TM, Li L (2009) Studies on construction pre-control of a connection aisle between two neighbouring tunnels in Shanghai by means of 3D FEM, neural networks and fuzzy logic. Geotech Geol Eng 27(1):155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Miao D, Wang R (2010) A rough set approach to feature selection based on ant colony optimization. Pattern Recogn Lett 31(3):226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia AG, Cortez P, Tinoco J, Marques R (2013) Artificial intelligence applications in transportation geotechnics. Geotech Geol Eng 31(3):861–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das BM (2010) Principles of foundation engineering, 7th edn. CL-Engineering, Pacific Grove, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Das SK (2013) Artificial neural networks in geotechnical engineering: modeling and application issues Chapter 10. In: Metaheuristics in water, geotechnical and transport engineering, pp 231–270

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Das SK, Basudhar PK (2006) Undrained lateral load capacity of piles in clay using artificial neural network. Comput Geotech 33:454–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erzin Y, Gul TO (2014) The use of neural networks for the prediction of the settlement of one-way footings on cohesionless soils based on standard penetration test. Neural Comput Appl 24:891–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fdhila R, Hamdani T, Alimi (2011) A distributed MOPSO with a new population subdivision technique for the feature selection. In: International symposium on computational intelligence and intelligent informatics (ISCIII), pp 81–86

  • Forman G (2003) An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J Mach Learn Res 3:1289–1305

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyon I, Elisseeff A (2003) An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res 3:1157–1182

    Google Scholar 

  • He X, Zhang Q, Sun N, Dong Y (2009) Feature selection with discrete binary differential evolution. In: International conference on artificial intelligence and computational intelligence (AICI), vol 4, pp 327–330

  • Hoang N-D, Pham A-D (2016) Hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on metaheuristic and machine learning for slope stability assessment: a multinational data analysis. Expert Syst Appl 46:60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanayama M, Rohe A, van Paassen LA (2014) Using and improving neural network models for ground settlement prediction. Geotech Geol Eng 32:687–697

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhof GG (1965) Shallow foundations. J Soil Mech Found Div 91(SM2):12–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Neshatian K, Zhang M (2009) Pareto front feature selection: using genetic programming to explore feature space. In: The 11th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation (GECCO 2009), pp 1027–1034

  • Rezania M, Javadi A (2007) A new genetic programming model for predicting settlement of shallow foundations. Can Geotech J 44(12):1462–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representation by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of congestion. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 318–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Samui P (2008) Support vector machine applied to settlement of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils. Comput Geotech 35:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samui P, Sitharam TG (2008) Least-square support vector machine applied to settlement of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:2033–2043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmertmann JH (1970) Static cone to compute static settlement over sand. J Soil Mech Found Div 96(SM3):1043–7302

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmertmann JH, Hartman JP, Brown PB (1978) Improved strain influence factor diagrams. J Geotech Eng 104(GT8):1011–1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze E, Sherif G (1973) Prediction of settlements from evaluated settlement observations for sand. In: proceedings of the eighth international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 1, pp 225–230

  • Shahin MA (2016) State-of-the-art review of some artificial intelligence applications in pile foundations. Geosci Front 7(1):33–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahin MA, Jaksa MB, Maier HR (2002a) Artificial neural network-based settlement prediction formula for shallow foundations on granular soils. Aust Geomech 37(4):45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahin MA, Maier HR, Jaksa MB (2002b) Predicting settlement of shallow foundations using neural networks. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128(9):785–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahin MA, Maier HR, Jaksa MB (2003) Settlement prediction of shallow foundations on granular soils using B-spline neurofuzzy models. Comput Geotech 30:637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahnazari H, Shahin MA, Tutunchian MA (2014) Evolutionary-based approaches for settlement prediction of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils. Int J Civ Eng 12(1):55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivakugan N, Eckersley JD, Li H (1998) Settlement predictions using neural networks. Aust Civ Eng Trans 40:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Soleimanbeigi A, Hataf N (2006) Prediction of settlement of shallow foundations on reinforced soils using neural networks. Geosynth Int 13(4):161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue B, Cervante L, Shang L, Browne WN, Zhang M (2012) A multi-objective particle swarm optimisation for filter based feature selection in classification problems. Connect Sci 24(2–3):91–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue B, Cervante L, Shang L, Browne WN, Zhang M (2014) Binary PSO and rough set theory for feature selection: a multi-objective filter based approach. Int J Comput Intell Appl 13(02):1450009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Pedersen JO (1997) A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In: ICML

  • Zare H (2013) Scoring relevancy of features based on combinatorial analysis of Lasso with application to lymphoma diagnosis. BMC Genom 14:S14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu ZX, Ong YS, Dash M (2007) Wrapper-filter feature selection algorithm using a memetic framework. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 37(1):70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarat Kumar Das.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohanty, R., Das, S.K. Settlement of Shallow Foundations on Cohesionless Soils Based on SPT Value Using Multi-Objective Feature Selection. Geotech Geol Eng 36, 3499–3509 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0549-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0549-0

Keywords

Navigation