Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 2425–2436 | Cite as

Experimental Investigation of the Influence of Drilling Arrangements on the Mechanical Behavior of Rock Models

  • Bin Huang
  • Wei-yao Guo
  • Zhi-yong Fu
  • Tong-bin Zhao
  • Lian-sheng Zhang
Original paper


Destress drilling method is one of the commonly used methods for mitigating rock bursts. To better understand the influence of drilling arrangements on the destress effect is beneficial for rock burst mitigation. This study experimentally investigated the influence of drilling arrangements (i.e. drilling diameter, number of drilling holes and number of drilling rows) on the mechanical properties of rock models through uniaxial compression tests. The acoustic emission (AE) technique was applied to record and analyze the information of failure processes. Test results show that both the stress–strain curves and the AE characteristics of rock models are controlled by drilling arrangements. Moreover, the uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus decrease as increasing the drilling diameter, number of drilling holes or number of drilling rows. The splitting failure accompanied with local shear failure is the main failure mode for specimens with different drilling arrangements, but the drilling arrangements influence the crack propagation and the damage degree. The test results can provide basic experimental data for further study on the destress drilling method.


Destress drilling Large-diameter drilling Drilling arrangement Mitigation Rock burst 



The research described in this paper was financially supported by State Key Research Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC0801401), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51604165, 51674160, 51474137), Tai’shan Scholar Engineering Construction Fund of Shandong Province of China, Taishan Scholar Talent Team Support Plan for Advantaged & Unique Discipline Areas. The authors thank the peer reviewers and Editors for their valuable comments and suggestions, which have greatly improved the manuscript.


  1. Aguado MBD, González C (2009) Influence of the stress state in a coal bump-prone deep coalbed: a case study. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:333–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fairhurst CE, Hudson JA (1999) Draft ISRM suggested method for the complete stress–strain curve for the intact rock in uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Guo WY, Tan YL, Zhao TB, Liu XM, Gu QH, Hu SC (2016) Compression creep characteristics and creep model establishment of gangue. Geotech Geol Eng 34(4):1193–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guo WY, Tan YL, Yang ZL, Zhao TB, Hu SC (2017a) Effect of saturation time on the bursting liability indexes of coal and its application for rock burst mitigation. Geotech Geol Eng. Google Scholar
  5. Guo WY, Zhao TB, Tan YL, Yu FH, Hu SC, Yang FQ (2017b) Progressive mitigation method of rock bursts under complicated geological conditions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 96:11–22Google Scholar
  6. Holub K, Rušajová J, Holečko J (2011) Particle velocity generated by rockburst during exploitation of the longwall and its impact on the workings. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:942–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jia CY, Jiang YJ, Zhang XP, Wang D, Luan HJ, Wang CS (2016) Laboratory and numerical study on pressure relief mechanism of large-hole diameter drill hole. Chin J Geotech Eng.
  8. Jiang YD, Pan YS, Jiang FX, Dou LM, Ju Y (2014) State of the art review on mechanism and prevention of coal bumps in China. J China Coal Soc 39(2):205–213Google Scholar
  9. Kaiser PK, Cai M (2012) Design of rock support system under rockburst condition. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 4(3):215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Konicek P, Soucek K, Stas L, Singh R (2013) Long-hole destress blasting for rockburst control during deep underground coal mining. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 61:141–153Google Scholar
  11. Lee SM, Parkb BS, Lee SW (2004) Analysis of rockbursts that have occurred in a waterway tunnel in Korea. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(3):1–6Google Scholar
  12. Li JK, Xiong ZH, Liu DS, Li XB (2009) Numeric simulation of borehole pressure relief preventing roadway rockburst of a mine. J Xian Univ Sci Technol 29(4):424–426Google Scholar
  13. Liu HG, He YN, Xu JH, Han LJ (2007) Numerical simulation and industrial test of boreholes destressing technology in deep coal tunnel. J China Coal Soc 32(1):33–37Google Scholar
  14. Liu JH, Jiang FX, Sun GJ, Zhang ZG, Tan WF (2014) Mechanism of intensive venting pulverized coal to prevent coal burst and its application. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 33(4):747–754Google Scholar
  15. Liu QS, Xu J, Liu XW, Jiang JD, Liu B (2015) The role of flaws on crack growth in rock-like material assessed by AE technique. Int J Fract 193(2):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lu CP, Liu GJ, Liu Y, Zhang N, Xue JH, Zhang L (2015) Microseismic multi-parameter characteristics of rockburst hazard induced by hard roof fall and high stress concentration. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 76:18–32Google Scholar
  17. Ma QZ, Jiang YD, Li YW, Yang YM (2015) Collaborative control of pressure-released boreholes with u-steel of roadways in ultra-soft coal seam. J China Coal Soc 40(10):2279–2286Google Scholar
  18. Song XX, Zuo YJ, Wang X (2014) Numerical simulation of pressure-released hole combined support with rockbolt in deep roadway with dynamic disturbance. J Cent South Univ (Sci Technol) 45(9):3158–3165Google Scholar
  19. Tan YL, Yu FH, Ning JG, Zhao TB (2015) Design and construction of entry retaining wall along a gob side under hard roof stratum. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 77:115–121Google Scholar
  20. Tan YL, Guo WY, Gu QH, Zhao TB, Yu FH, Hu SC, Yin YC (2016) Research on the rockburst tendency and AE characteristics of inhomogeneous coal–rock combination bodies. Shock Vib 2:1–11Google Scholar
  21. Tan YL, Liu XS, Ning JG, Lu YW (2017) In situ investigations on failure development of overlying strata induced by mining multiple coalseams. Geotech Test J 40(2):244–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yi EB, Mu ZL, Dou LM, Ju JG, Xie L, Xu DL (2011) Study on comparison and analysis on pressure releasing effect of boreholes in soft and hard seam. Coal Sci Technol 39(6):1–5Google Scholar
  23. Zhao TB, Guo WY, Tan YL, Zhang Z, Cheng KK (2016) Research on the mechanics mechanism of rock burst for mining in the variable region of coal thickness. J China Coal Soc 41(7):1659–1666Google Scholar
  24. Zhao TB, Guo WY, Tan YL, Lu CP, Wang CW (2017a) Case histories of rock bursts under complicated geological conditions. Bull Eng Geol Environ. Google Scholar
  25. Zhao TB, Guo WY, Tan YL, Yu FH, Huang B, Zhang LS (2017b) Failure mechanism of layer-crack rock models with different vertical fissure geometric configurations under uniaxial compression. Adv Mech Eng 9(11):1–15Google Scholar
  26. Zhu QH, Lu WB, Sun JS, Luo Y, Chen M (2009) Prevention of rockburst by guide holes based on numerical simulations. Int J Min Sci Technol 19(3):346–351Google Scholar
  27. Zhu ST, Jiang FX, Shi XF, Sun GJ, Zhang ZG, Cheng XM, Zhang H (2015) Energy dissipation index method for determining rockburst prevention drilling parameters. Rock Soil Mech 36(8):2270–2276Google Scholar
  28. Zhao TB, Guo WY, Tan YL, Yin YC, Cai LS, Pan JF (2018) Case studies of rock bursts under complicated geological conditions during multi-seam mining at a depth of 800m. Rock Mech Rock Eng. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and TechnologyShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  2. 2.College of Mining and Safety EngineeringShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  3. 3.National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mining Engineering EducationShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations