Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

, Volume 30, Issue 5, pp 1231–1247 | Cite as

Selection Assistance for the Evaluation of Geoconstruction Technologies for Transportation Applications

Original paper


A new comprehensive, web-based information system summarizes forty-six geoconstruction technologies, or ground improvement methods, applicable to transportation infrastructure from the following areas: geosynthetics, geotextiles, ground improvement, grouting, slope stabilization, soil reinforcement, soil stabilization, and alternative/recycled materials. Selection assistance was developed as part of the overall information system to aid the user in identifying potential geoconstruction technologies for a project-specific set of conditions. A knowledge base to assist a user in evaluating the current status of each technology with regard to the U.S. practice and the potential applications for each technology is described in detail. Selection assistance includes qualitative ratings for each technology, a listing of the technologies sorted by classification or desired improvement, and a dynamic, Interactive Selection tool. After assisting the user in identifying a short list of potential technologies, the user can access the technology specific data in the information system to further evaluate the technologies. Engineers, planners, and owners will be able to utilize the entire information system to assess the feasibility of technologies to address project-specific requirements and constraints.


Geotechnical engineering Ground improvement Knowledge base Information system Decision support system 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the efforts of their colleagues on the research team: Donald Bruce, Barry Christopher, Jim Collin, Gary Fick, George Filz, Jie Han, James Mitchell, Dennis Turner, Linbing Wang, and David White, who served as co-principal investigators on the SHRP 2 R02 project. A number of students/researchers from Iowa State University, Virginia Tech and the University of Kansas contributed to the development of the materials for the project and their efforts are greatly appreciated. The members of the SHRP 2 R02 Advisory Board provided invaluable advice during the project. This study was funded by the Strategic Highway Research Program 2 of The National Academies, with Dr. James Bryant as program manager. The opinions, findings and conclusions presented here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the research sponsor.

Supplementary material

10706_2012_9534_MOESM1_ESM.doc (48 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 48 kb)
10706_2012_9534_MOESM2_ESM.doc (115 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 115 kb)
10706_2012_9534_MOESM3_ESM.doc (88 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOC 89 kb)
10706_2012_9534_MOESM4_ESM.doc (232 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOC 232 kb)
10706_2012_9534_MOESM5_ESM.doc (102 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (DOC 103 kb)


  1. ASCE (1978) Soil improvement-history, capabilities, and outlook. In: Mitchell JK (ed). ASCE, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. ASCE (1987) Soil improvement—a ten year update. In: Welsh JP (ed). Geotech. Spec. Publ. No. 12, ASCE, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. ASCE (1997) Ground improvement, ground treatment, ground reinforcement-developments 1987–1997. In: Schaefer VR (ed). Geotech. Special Publication No. 69, ASCE, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Chameau RL, Santamarina JC (1989) Knowledge-based system for soil improvement. J Comput Civil Eng 3(3):253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charles JA, Watts, KS (2002) Treated ground—engineering properties and performance. CIRIA C572, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng M-Y, Tsai H-C, Ko C-H, Chang W-T (2008) Evolutionary fuzzy neural inference system for decision making in geotechnical engineering. J Comput Civil Eng 22(4):272–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chu J, Varaksin S, Klotz U, Menge P (2009) Construction processes, state of the art report. 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. Alexandria, Egypt, 5–9 Oct 2009Google Scholar
  8. Douglas SC, Schaefer VR, Berg RR (2012) Web-based information and guidance system development report—SHRP 2 R02 project. Report prepared for the Strategic Highway Research Program 2, FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  9. Elias V, Welsh J, Warren J, Lukas R, Collin JG, Berg RR (2006) Ground improvement methods. FHWA NHI-06-019 (vol 1) and FHWA NHI-06-020 (vol 2), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Fredlund MD, Sillers WS, Fredlund DG, Wilson GW (1996) Design of a knowledge-based system for unsaturated soil properties. 3rd Canadian conference on computing in civil and building engineering. Montreal, Quebec, 26–28 AugGoogle Scholar
  11. Holtz RD (1989) Treatment of problem foundations for highway embankments. National cooperative highway research report 147, Synthesis of highway practice. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Hopple GW (1998) The state-of-the-art in decision support systems. QED Information Sciences, Wellesley, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. Ignizio JP (1991) Introduction to expert systems: the development and implementation of rule-based expert systems. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson P (1999) Introduction to expert systems, 3rd edn. Addison Wesley Longman, EssexGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitchell JK (1981) Soil improvement: state-of-the-art. Proceedings of tenth international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering. Stockholm, Sweden, vol 4, pp 509–565, JuneGoogle Scholar
  16. Motamed F, Salazar G, D’Andrea R (1991) An expert system for preliminary ground improvement selection. Geotechnical engineering congress 1991, vol I. ASCE, New York, pp 379-390Google Scholar
  17. Munfakh GA, Wyllie DC (2000) Ground improvement engineering—issues and selection. GeoEng 2000, 19–24 Nov 2000, Melbourne, Australia, vol 1: invited papers. Technomic, Lancaster, PA, pp 333–359Google Scholar
  18. Naik K, Tripathy P (2008) Software testing and quality assurance, theory and practice. Wiley, New JerseyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sadek S, Khoury G (2000) Soil and site improvement guide: an educational tool for engineered ground modification. Int J Eng Educ 16(6):499–508Google Scholar
  20. Spring GS, Collura J, Shuldiner PW, Watson J (1991) Testing, verification, and validation of expert systems. J Transp Eng 117(3):350–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Terashi M, Juran I (2000) ground improvement—state of the art. GeoEng 2000, 19–24 Nov 2000, Melbourne, Australia, vol 1. Technomic, Lancaster, PA, pp 461–519Google Scholar
  22. USACE (1999) Guidelines on ground improvement for structures and facilities. Technical Letter No. 1110-1-185. Department of the Army. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C., FebruaryGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Union Pacific RailroadOmahaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  3. 3.Ryan R. Berg and Associates, Inc.WoodburyUSA

Personalised recommendations