Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 249–258 | Cite as

Importance of Experimental Testing for Damage Identification of Existing Buildings in Egypt

Original paper


Population increase and development plans in Egypt require the establishment of many new cities near Cairo. One of these cities is the 15th of May City located about 30 km south of Cairo. The site of this city is very near from two quarries belonging to two cement companies. The inhabitants used to complain from the blastings in these quarries. At a certain stage some buildings have suffered different levels of damage. Upon the request of official authorities a study program has been performed to identify the causes and the safety of five chosen buildings. The program included experimental testing to measure the vibration of the chosen buildings during blasting operations. Three-dimensional structural analysis has been also performed. Results have showed that the damage was due to Dahshour Earthquake of Oct. 12th, 1992 and not due to quarry blastings. Many other useful conclusions have been obtained.


Testing Blasting Earthquake Damage Identification Existing Buildings Egypt 


  1. Computers and Structures, Inc (2002) SAP 2000 nonlinear. Version 8.0, Berkeley, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Egyptian Society for Earthquake Engineering (ESEE) (1988) Regulations for earthquake—resistant design of buildings in Egypt. Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  3. Housing and Building Research Center (HBRC) (1990) Egyptian code for design and execution of reinforced concrete structures. Ministerial Decree No. 464, 1989, Cairo, Egypt. (In Arabic)Google Scholar
  4. Housing and Building Research Center (HBRC) (1994) Egyptian code for calculation of loads and forces in structural and masonry works. Ministerial Decree No. 45, 1993, Cairo, Egypt. (In Arabic)Google Scholar
  5. Housing and Building Research Center (HBRC) (1995) Egyptian code for soil mechanics, design and execution of foundations. Ministerial Decree No. 199,1995, Cairo, Egypt. (In Arabic)Google Scholar
  6. Mukhopadhyay A, Chakravorty D, Chattopadhyay A, Sengupta B (1998) Dynamic response study of multistory tunnel type construction against seismic loading. In: Proceedings of 6th US national conference on earthquake engineering, Seattle, Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Sobaih M (1992) Appraisal of current aseismic design regulations in Egypt. Bull Int Inst Seismol Earthq Eng, Japan, 26:279–292Google Scholar
  8. Sobaih M, Soliman MM, Elnashai AS (1992) Seismic vulnerability evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings. In: Proceedings of international symposium on earthquakes and ways of protection, Aleppo, Syria, April 21–23, Paper No 10, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  9. Soliman MM, Mahmoud AH, Elfar S, Sobaih M (1993) Implications of damage to nasser school building in cairo earthquake of 12th October, 1992. In: Proceedings of first Egyptian conference on earthquake engineering, EGYQUAKE1, Hurghada, Egypt, Dec 6–9, pp 159–172Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Structural Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringCairo UniversityGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations