Skip to main content
Log in

Bridge Monitoring and Performance Evaluation

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over fifty percent of our nation’s 560,000-plus bridges are obsolete or structurally deficient. To upgrade or replace these structures would require a serious budget. In order to shorten this list of bridges and to improve their ratings, state DOTs are investigating new repair techniques and better performance evaluation tools in order to implement the new drive to sustainability within the infrastructure. The research presented herein focused on the evaluation of current US bridge analysis and rating procedures for the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). To evaluate these procedures, several bridges were rated with commercially available software and a newly developed spreadsheet program. In parallel, the bridges were also load tested for comparison, from which, it was concluded that the NCDOT’s bridge rating software directly follows the latest AASHTO requirements. The experimental results, however, also proved that the bridges had significant strength reserves associated to several factors, such as, girder/deck composite action, impact and distribution factors, material strength, and contribution of non-structural elements. In this research, a simplified bridge testing protocol was developed from which it was concluded, that a relatively simple instrumentation setup could be effective in the load rating of bridges through testing. The data gathered through these instruments provide vital performance data for normal traffic conditions, as well as during extreme loading conditions and evacuations, which could lead to less restrictive load ratings and removal of the structurally deficient classification, yielding a more sustainable structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2000) Manual for condition evaluation of bridges, second edition (revised by 1995–2000 Interim Revisions). Washington

  • Beal DB (1998) Manual for bridge rating through load testing. Research Results Digest. Number 234. Nov 1998

  • Gergely J, Lawrence TO, Prado CL, Ritter CT, Stiller WB (2004) Evaluation of bridge analysis vis-à-vis performance. North Carolina Department of Transportation Research Project No. HWY-2002-12, Final Report

  • National Bridge Inventory (2003) http://www.nationalbridgeinventory.com

  • Stallings JM, Yoo CH (1993) Tests and ratings of short span steel bridges. J Struct Eng ASCE 119(7)

  • Vanderzee PJ (2005) A bridge too near. Bridges Mag 8(1):18–21

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The North Carolina Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration’s Innovative Bridge Research and Construction program sponsored the research documented in this report. The authors would like to thank the Division 10 Bridge Maintenance Unit for their technical and material assistance throughout the project. The authors would also like to thank Concrete Supply of Charlotte, NC, which provided the use of their truck to load two of the bridges, Vulcraft of Florence, SC, which supplied the work platform for one of the bridges, Zapata Engineering of Charlotte, NC, which provided additional instruments to the last two bridge tests. Thanks are also extended to AASHTOWare for the use of the demonstration programs. Their contributions are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janos Gergely.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawrence, T.O., Ritter, C.T. & Gergely, J. Bridge Monitoring and Performance Evaluation. Geotech Geol Eng 29, 919–926 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9365-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9365-x

Keywords

Navigation