Skip to main content
Log in

Nitrogen cycling trade-offs with broadcasting and injecting dairy manure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the fate of nutrients in land-applied manure is key to improving the efficiency of their use in crop production. We developed nitrogen (N) budgets for 2 years of continuously cropped corn fertilized by dairy manure via broadcast application or shallow disk injection. Major pathways and pools of N loss were monitored on 12, 0.04 ha field lysimeters in central Pennsylvania, USA to estimate the impact of manure application method on N fate: gas emissions, off-site runoff (overland and subsurface flow), crop uptake, and, soil storage. The budgets illuminated trade-offs in N cycling with each management strategy. Crop removal accounted for the largest portions of manure N applied in both budgets (16–43%). Injection manure N balances were more difficult to close because balances included a large proportion of ‘unaccounted’ N (49% and 68% of applied N for two accounting periods). Even so, results point to cumulative differences in nutrient use efficiencies that can be attributed to the greater conservation of ammonia-N with manure injection. There was an apparent build-up of soil N with manure injection that was not observed with broadcast application (in pre sidedress nitrogen test measurements). However, these trends were preliminary; over the two growing seasons covered by this study, these findings did not result in significant differences in corn yield or crop N removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeli A, Tewolde H, Shankle MW, Way TR, Brooks JP, McLaughlin MR (2013) Runoff quality from no-till cotton fertilized with broiler litter in subsurface bands. J Environ Qual 42:284–291. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bittman S, Kowalenko CG, Hunt DE, Schmidt O (1999) Surface-banded and broadcast dairy manure effects on tall fescue yield and nitrogen uptake. Agron J 91:826–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braker WL (1981) Soil survey of centre county Pennsylvania USA: US soil conservation service soil survey, USDA, Washington DC, pp 1–4

  • Carey PL, Rate AW, Cameron KC (1997) Fate of nitrogen in pig slurry applied to a New Zealand pasture soil. Aust J Soil Res 35:941–959. https://doi.org/10.1071/s96088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick DR, Pain BF, Brookman SKE (2000) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions following application of animal manures to grassland. J Environ Qual 29:277–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho BRB, Roy RC, Topp E, Lapen DR (2007) Tile water quality following liquid swine manure application into standing corn. J Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort SD, Kelling KA, Keeney DR, Converse JC (1990) Nitrous-oxide production from injected liquid dairy manure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:421–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell CJ, Meisinger JJ, Beegle DB (2011) Subsurface application of manures slurries for conservation tillage and pasture soils and their impact on the nitrogen balance. J Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dell CJ, Kleinman PJA, Schmidt JP, Beegle DB (2012) Low-disturbance manure incorporation effects on ammonia and nitrate loss. J Environ Qual 41:928–937. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz DAR, Sawyer JE, Barker DW, Mallarino AP (2010) Runoff nitrogen loss with simulated rainfall immediately following poultry manure application for corn production. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:221–230. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dosch P, Gutser R (1996) Reducing N losses (NH3, N2O, N-2) and immobilization from slurry through optimized application techniques. Fertil Res 43:165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan EW, Dell CJ, Kleinman PJA, Beegle DB (2016) Nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from injected and broadcast-applied dairy slurry. J Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2016.05.0171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan EW, Kleinman PJA, Folmar GJ, Saporito L, Feyereisen GW, Buda AR, Vitko L, Collick A, Drohan P, Lin H, Bryant RB, Beegle DB (2017a) Field scale lysimeters to assess management impacts on runoff. ASABE, Trans. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.11901

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan EW, Kleinman PJA, Rotz CA (2017b) Coupling dairy manure storage with injection to improve nitrogen management: whole-farm simulation using the integrated farm system model. Agric Environ Lett 2:160048. https://doi.org/10.2134/ael2016.12.0048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flessa H, Beese F (2000) Laboratory estimates of trace gas emissions following surface application and injection of cattle slurry. J Environ Qual 29:262–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallaher RN, Weldon CO, Boswell FC (1976) A semiautomated procedure for total nitrogen in plant and soil samples. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:887–889

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gillam KM, Zebarth BJ, Burton DL (2008) Nitrous oxide emissions from denitrification and the partitioning of gaseous losses as affected by nitrate and carbon addition and soil aeration. Can J Soil Sci 88:133–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin G (1995) Recommended soil nitrate-N tests. In: Thomas Sims J, Wolf A (eds) Recommended soil testing procedures for the Northeastern United States. Northeast regional bulletin #493. Agricultural experiment station. University of Delaware, Newark, pp 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Altabet MA, Bohlke JK, Butterbach-Bahl K, David MB, Firestone MK, Giblin AE, Kana TM, Nielsen LP, Voytek MA (2006) Methods for measuring denitrification: diverse approaches to a difficult problem. Ecol Appl 16(6):2091–2122. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016%5b2091:mfmdda%5d2.0.co;2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman RB, Reinsch TG (2002) Bulk density and linear extensibility: core method. In: Dane JJ, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4, physical methods. SSSA, Madison, pp 208–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstra N, Bouwman AF (2005) Denitrification in agricultural soils: summarizing published data and estimating global annual rates. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 72(3):267–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-005-3109-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokela WE, Casler MD (2011) Transport of phosphorus and nitrogen in surface runoff in a corn silage system: paired watershed methodology and calibration period results. Can J Soil Sci 91:479–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketterings QM, Godwin G, Barney P, Lawrence JR, Aldrich B, Kilcer T et al (2013) Shallow mixing of surface soil and liquid dairy manure conserves nitrogen while retaining surface residue. Agron Sustain Dev 33:507–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0141-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman P, Blunk KS, Bryant R, Saporito L, Beegle D, Czymmek K et al (2012) Managing manure for sustainable livestock production in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. J Soil Water Conserv 67:54A–61A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jSWC.67.2.54A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachat Instruments (2001) Ammonia (phenolate) in potable and surface waters. Lachat Instruments, Loveland

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachat Instruments (2003) Determination of nitrate/nitrite in surface and wastewaters by flow injection analysis. QuickChem method 10-107-04-1-A. Lachat Instruments, Loveland

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalor STJ, Schroder JJ, Lantinga EA, Oenema O, Kirwan L, Schulte RPO (2011) Nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of cattle slurry in grassland as affected by method and timing of application. J Environ Qual 40:362–373. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JR, Ketterings QM, Cherney JH, Bossard SE, Godwin GS (2008) Tillage tools for manure incorporation and N conservation. Soil Sci 173:649–658. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3181893923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Salas W, Zhang R, Krauter C, Rotz A, Mitloehner F (2012) Manure-DNDC: a biogeochemical process model for quantifying greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from livestock manure systems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 93: 163–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-012-9507-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire RO, Kleinman PJA, Dell CJ, Beegle DB, Brandt RC, McGrath JM et al (2011) Manure application technology in reduced tillage and forage systems: a review. J Environ Qual 40:292–301. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RO (1998) Extractable nitrate in plant tissue: ion-selective electrode method. In: Kalra YP (ed) Handbook and reference methods for plant analysis. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Misselbrook TH, Laws JA, Pain BF (1996) Surface application and shallow injection of cattle slurry on grassland: nitrogen losses, herbage yields and nitrogen recoveries. Grass Forage Sci 51:270–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1996.tb02062.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montes F, Rotz CA, Chaoui H (2009) Process modeling of ammonia volatilization from ammonium solution and manure surfaces: a review with recommended models. Trans ASABE 52:1707–1719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morken J, Sakshaug S (1998) Direct ground injection of livestock waste slurry to avoid ammonia. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 51(1):59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvaney RL (1996) Nitrogen inorganic forms. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. SSSA book series 5. SSSA, Madison, pp 1123–1184

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz GR, Powell JM, Kelling KA (2003) Nitrogen budget and soil N dynamics after multiple applications of unlabeled or (15)nitrogen-enriched dairy manure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:817–825

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patton CJ, Kryskalla JR (2003) Methods of analysis by the US Geological Survey National water quality laboratory—evaluation of alkaline persulfate digestion as an alternative to kjeldahl digestion for determination of total dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus in water: US Geological survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4174, 33 p

  • Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences (1999) Agronomy Facts17: presidedress soil nitrate test for corn. Prepared by Douglas Beegle, Professor of agronomy; Richard Fox, professor of soil science; Gregory Roth, associate professor of agronomy and William Piekielek, research support associate

  • Peters JB (ed) (2003) Recommended methods of manure analysis. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Cooperative Extension Publ. A3769. http://uwlab.soils.wisc.edu/pubs/A3769.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2007

  • Piccinini S, Bortone G (1991) The fertilizer value of agricultural manure-simple rapid methods of assessment. J Agric Eng Res 49:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(91)80039-h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell JM, Jokela WE, Misselbrook TH (2011) Dairy slurry application method impacts ammonia emission and nitrate leaching in no-till corn silage. J Environ Qual 40:383–392. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rotz CA, Montes F, Hafner SD, Heber AJ, Grant RH (2014) Ammonia emission model for whole farm evaluation of dairy production systems. J Environ Qual 43:1143–1158. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.04.0121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rotz CA, Corson MS, Chianese DS, Montes F, Hafner SD, Bonifacio HF, Coiner CU (2018) Integrated farm system model: reference manual version 4.4. USDA-ARS, University Park. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80700500/Reference%20Manual.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2018

  • Salazar FJ, Chadwick D, Pain BF, Hatch D, Owen E (2005) Nitrogen budgets for three cropping systems fertilised with cattle manure. Biores Technol 96:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotrech.2004.05.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH (2009) On the fate of anthropogenic nitrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(1):203–208. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810193105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schroder JJ, Uenk D, Hilhorst GJ (2007) Long-term nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of cattle manures applied to cut grassland. Plant Soil 299:83–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9365-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles J, Shadwick DS (2007) Changes in air quality and atmospheric deposition in the eastern United States: 1990–2004. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RB, Ryden JC, Lockyer DR (1987) Fate of nitrogen in cattle slurry following surface application or injection to grassland. J Soil Sci 38:689–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb J, Pain B, Bittman S, Morgan J (2010) The impacts of manure application methods on emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and on crop response—a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weslien P, Klemedtsson L, Svensson L, Galle B, Kasimir-Klemedtsson A, Gustafsson A (1998) Nitrogen losses following application of pig slurry to arable land. Soil Use Manag 14:200–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks are extended to Bart Moyer, Lou Saporito, Sarah Fishel (USDA-ARS) and Curtis Kennedy (Penn State University) who provided monitoring and laboratory support. Dr. Heather Karsten (Penn State University) deserves special recognition for overseeing the farming systems project to which this study contributed. Funding for the study was provided by USDA’s Northeast SARE program, USDA-ARS and Penn State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. W. Duncan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The US Department of Agriculture prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 401 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duncan, E.W., Kleinman, P.J.A., Beegle, D.B. et al. Nitrogen cycling trade-offs with broadcasting and injecting dairy manure. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 114, 57–70 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-09975-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-09975-2

Keywords

Navigation