Abstract
Understanding the fate of nutrients in land-applied manure is key to improving the efficiency of their use in crop production. We developed nitrogen (N) budgets for 2 years of continuously cropped corn fertilized by dairy manure via broadcast application or shallow disk injection. Major pathways and pools of N loss were monitored on 12, 0.04 ha field lysimeters in central Pennsylvania, USA to estimate the impact of manure application method on N fate: gas emissions, off-site runoff (overland and subsurface flow), crop uptake, and, soil storage. The budgets illuminated trade-offs in N cycling with each management strategy. Crop removal accounted for the largest portions of manure N applied in both budgets (16–43%). Injection manure N balances were more difficult to close because balances included a large proportion of ‘unaccounted’ N (49% and 68% of applied N for two accounting periods). Even so, results point to cumulative differences in nutrient use efficiencies that can be attributed to the greater conservation of ammonia-N with manure injection. There was an apparent build-up of soil N with manure injection that was not observed with broadcast application (in pre sidedress nitrogen test measurements). However, these trends were preliminary; over the two growing seasons covered by this study, these findings did not result in significant differences in corn yield or crop N removal.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adeli A, Tewolde H, Shankle MW, Way TR, Brooks JP, McLaughlin MR (2013) Runoff quality from no-till cotton fertilized with broiler litter in subsurface bands. J Environ Qual 42:284–291. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0358
Bittman S, Kowalenko CG, Hunt DE, Schmidt O (1999) Surface-banded and broadcast dairy manure effects on tall fescue yield and nitrogen uptake. Agron J 91:826–833
Braker WL (1981) Soil survey of centre county Pennsylvania USA: US soil conservation service soil survey, USDA, Washington DC, pp 1–4
Carey PL, Rate AW, Cameron KC (1997) Fate of nitrogen in pig slurry applied to a New Zealand pasture soil. Aust J Soil Res 35:941–959. https://doi.org/10.1071/s96088
Chadwick DR, Pain BF, Brookman SKE (2000) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions following application of animal manures to grassland. J Environ Qual 29:277–287
Coelho BRB, Roy RC, Topp E, Lapen DR (2007) Tile water quality following liquid swine manure application into standing corn. J Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0306
Comfort SD, Kelling KA, Keeney DR, Converse JC (1990) Nitrous-oxide production from injected liquid dairy manure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:421–427
Dell CJ, Meisinger JJ, Beegle DB (2011) Subsurface application of manures slurries for conservation tillage and pasture soils and their impact on the nitrogen balance. J Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0069
Dell CJ, Kleinman PJA, Schmidt JP, Beegle DB (2012) Low-disturbance manure incorporation effects on ammonia and nitrate loss. J Environ Qual 41:928–937. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0327
Diaz DAR, Sawyer JE, Barker DW, Mallarino AP (2010) Runoff nitrogen loss with simulated rainfall immediately following poultry manure application for corn production. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:221–230. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0134
Dosch P, Gutser R (1996) Reducing N losses (NH3, N2O, N-2) and immobilization from slurry through optimized application techniques. Fertil Res 43:165–171
Duncan EW, Dell CJ, Kleinman PJA, Beegle DB (2016) Nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from injected and broadcast-applied dairy slurry. J Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2016.05.0171
Duncan EW, Kleinman PJA, Folmar GJ, Saporito L, Feyereisen GW, Buda AR, Vitko L, Collick A, Drohan P, Lin H, Bryant RB, Beegle DB (2017a) Field scale lysimeters to assess management impacts on runoff. ASABE, Trans. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.11901
Duncan EW, Kleinman PJA, Rotz CA (2017b) Coupling dairy manure storage with injection to improve nitrogen management: whole-farm simulation using the integrated farm system model. Agric Environ Lett 2:160048. https://doi.org/10.2134/ael2016.12.0048
Flessa H, Beese F (2000) Laboratory estimates of trace gas emissions following surface application and injection of cattle slurry. J Environ Qual 29:262–268
Gallaher RN, Weldon CO, Boswell FC (1976) A semiautomated procedure for total nitrogen in plant and soil samples. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:887–889
Gillam KM, Zebarth BJ, Burton DL (2008) Nitrous oxide emissions from denitrification and the partitioning of gaseous losses as affected by nitrate and carbon addition and soil aeration. Can J Soil Sci 88:133–143
Griffin G (1995) Recommended soil nitrate-N tests. In: Thomas Sims J, Wolf A (eds) Recommended soil testing procedures for the Northeastern United States. Northeast regional bulletin #493. Agricultural experiment station. University of Delaware, Newark, pp 17–24
Groffman PM, Altabet MA, Bohlke JK, Butterbach-Bahl K, David MB, Firestone MK, Giblin AE, Kana TM, Nielsen LP, Voytek MA (2006) Methods for measuring denitrification: diverse approaches to a difficult problem. Ecol Appl 16(6):2091–2122. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016%5b2091:mfmdda%5d2.0.co;2
Grossman RB, Reinsch TG (2002) Bulk density and linear extensibility: core method. In: Dane JJ, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4, physical methods. SSSA, Madison, pp 208–228
Hofstra N, Bouwman AF (2005) Denitrification in agricultural soils: summarizing published data and estimating global annual rates. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 72(3):267–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-005-3109-y
Jokela WE, Casler MD (2011) Transport of phosphorus and nitrogen in surface runoff in a corn silage system: paired watershed methodology and calibration period results. Can J Soil Sci 91:479–491
Ketterings QM, Godwin G, Barney P, Lawrence JR, Aldrich B, Kilcer T et al (2013) Shallow mixing of surface soil and liquid dairy manure conserves nitrogen while retaining surface residue. Agron Sustain Dev 33:507–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0141-1
Kleinman P, Blunk KS, Bryant R, Saporito L, Beegle D, Czymmek K et al (2012) Managing manure for sustainable livestock production in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. J Soil Water Conserv 67:54A–61A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jSWC.67.2.54A
Lachat Instruments (2001) Ammonia (phenolate) in potable and surface waters. Lachat Instruments, Loveland
Lachat Instruments (2003) Determination of nitrate/nitrite in surface and wastewaters by flow injection analysis. QuickChem method 10-107-04-1-A. Lachat Instruments, Loveland
Lalor STJ, Schroder JJ, Lantinga EA, Oenema O, Kirwan L, Schulte RPO (2011) Nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of cattle slurry in grassland as affected by method and timing of application. J Environ Qual 40:362–373. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0038
Lawrence JR, Ketterings QM, Cherney JH, Bossard SE, Godwin GS (2008) Tillage tools for manure incorporation and N conservation. Soil Sci 173:649–658. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3181893923
Li C, Salas W, Zhang R, Krauter C, Rotz A, Mitloehner F (2012) Manure-DNDC: a biogeochemical process model for quantifying greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from livestock manure systems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 93: 163–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-012-9507-z
Maguire RO, Kleinman PJA, Dell CJ, Beegle DB, Brandt RC, McGrath JM et al (2011) Manure application technology in reduced tillage and forage systems: a review. J Environ Qual 40:292–301. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0228
Miller RO (1998) Extractable nitrate in plant tissue: ion-selective electrode method. In: Kalra YP (ed) Handbook and reference methods for plant analysis. CRC Press, New York
Misselbrook TH, Laws JA, Pain BF (1996) Surface application and shallow injection of cattle slurry on grassland: nitrogen losses, herbage yields and nitrogen recoveries. Grass Forage Sci 51:270–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1996.tb02062.x
Montes F, Rotz CA, Chaoui H (2009) Process modeling of ammonia volatilization from ammonium solution and manure surfaces: a review with recommended models. Trans ASABE 52:1707–1719
Morken J, Sakshaug S (1998) Direct ground injection of livestock waste slurry to avoid ammonia. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 51(1):59–63
Mulvaney RL (1996) Nitrogen inorganic forms. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. SSSA book series 5. SSSA, Madison, pp 1123–1184
Munoz GR, Powell JM, Kelling KA (2003) Nitrogen budget and soil N dynamics after multiple applications of unlabeled or (15)nitrogen-enriched dairy manure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:817–825
Patton CJ, Kryskalla JR (2003) Methods of analysis by the US Geological Survey National water quality laboratory—evaluation of alkaline persulfate digestion as an alternative to kjeldahl digestion for determination of total dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus in water: US Geological survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4174, 33 p
Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences (1999) Agronomy Facts17: presidedress soil nitrate test for corn. Prepared by Douglas Beegle, Professor of agronomy; Richard Fox, professor of soil science; Gregory Roth, associate professor of agronomy and William Piekielek, research support associate
Peters JB (ed) (2003) Recommended methods of manure analysis. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Cooperative Extension Publ. A3769. http://uwlab.soils.wisc.edu/pubs/A3769.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2007
Piccinini S, Bortone G (1991) The fertilizer value of agricultural manure-simple rapid methods of assessment. J Agric Eng Res 49:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(91)80039-h
Powell JM, Jokela WE, Misselbrook TH (2011) Dairy slurry application method impacts ammonia emission and nitrate leaching in no-till corn silage. J Environ Qual 40:383–392. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0082
Rotz CA, Montes F, Hafner SD, Heber AJ, Grant RH (2014) Ammonia emission model for whole farm evaluation of dairy production systems. J Environ Qual 43:1143–1158. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.04.0121
Rotz CA, Corson MS, Chianese DS, Montes F, Hafner SD, Bonifacio HF, Coiner CU (2018) Integrated farm system model: reference manual version 4.4. USDA-ARS, University Park. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80700500/Reference%20Manual.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2018
Salazar FJ, Chadwick D, Pain BF, Hatch D, Owen E (2005) Nitrogen budgets for three cropping systems fertilised with cattle manure. Biores Technol 96:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotrech.2004.05.013
Schlesinger WH (2009) On the fate of anthropogenic nitrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(1):203–208. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810193105
Schroder JJ, Uenk D, Hilhorst GJ (2007) Long-term nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of cattle manures applied to cut grassland. Plant Soil 299:83–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9365-7
Sickles J, Shadwick DS (2007) Changes in air quality and atmospheric deposition in the eastern United States: 1990–2004. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007843
Thompson RB, Ryden JC, Lockyer DR (1987) Fate of nitrogen in cattle slurry following surface application or injection to grassland. J Soil Sci 38:689–700
Webb J, Pain B, Bittman S, Morgan J (2010) The impacts of manure application methods on emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and on crop response—a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.01.001
Weslien P, Klemedtsson L, Svensson L, Galle B, Kasimir-Klemedtsson A, Gustafsson A (1998) Nitrogen losses following application of pig slurry to arable land. Soil Use Manag 14:200–208
Acknowledgements
Many thanks are extended to Bart Moyer, Lou Saporito, Sarah Fishel (USDA-ARS) and Curtis Kennedy (Penn State University) who provided monitoring and laboratory support. Dr. Heather Karsten (Penn State University) deserves special recognition for overseeing the farming systems project to which this study contributed. Funding for the study was provided by USDA’s Northeast SARE program, USDA-ARS and Penn State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The US Department of Agriculture prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duncan, E.W., Kleinman, P.J.A., Beegle, D.B. et al. Nitrogen cycling trade-offs with broadcasting and injecting dairy manure. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 114, 57–70 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-09975-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-09975-2