Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cradle-to-cooked-edible-meat analysis of greenhouse gas emissions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to synthesize mean cradle-to-cooked-edible-meat greenhouse gas emission factors for bovine, ovine, pig, and poultry meat through a systematic review process. 64 studies involving 42 countries/regions, published between 1997 and 2015 were identified meeting selection criteria using Cochrane search strategies. Major emission activities were identified and synthesised into a cradle-to-cooked-edible-meat lifecycle system. 270 emission factors were identified from publications and taken as baselines. 67% baseline evaluation boundaries stopped at farm-gate, only 3% at home/restaurants. Baseline emission gaps were identified by comparing baseline evaluation systems against the synthesised system. Emission factors for major activities were identified from publications and mean values were used to fill emission gaps in order to obtain the cradle-to-cooked-edible-meat emission factors, which were then grouped to obtain a mean cradle-to-cooked-edible-meat emission factor for each meat type. Mean emission factors (kg CO2-eq/kg) for adjusted cradle-to-cooked-edible-meats were: Bovine 61.3 (n = 124), Ovine 61.2 (n = 38), Pig 15.8 (n = 56) and Poultry 9.4 (n = 52), which are significantly higher than the adjusted means for carcass at regional-distribution-centre: Bovine 23.9 (n = 118), Ovine 23.3 (n = 9), Pig 5.0 (n = 51) and Poultry 3.6 (n = 45); or the adjusted means for saleable meat at retail: Bovine 32.3 (n = 122), Ovine 31.2 (n = 36), Pig 7.9 (54), and Poultry 4.2 (n = 50). This study confirmed current meat emission evaluations reflect only a fraction of dietary impacts. Emission factors for cooked-edible-meat could be three times the amount of meat commodities at farm-gate. Emission factors vary significantly within and between meat types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blasing TJ (2017) Recent greenhouse gas concentrations. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/pns/current_ghg.html. Accessed 28 Mar 2018

  • Carlsson-Kanyama A, González AD (2009) Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change. Am J Clin Nutr 85:1704S–1709S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro D, Davis SJ, Bastianoni S, Caldeira K (2014) Global and regional trends in greenhouse gas emissions from livestock. Clim Change 126:203–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caro D, Davis SJ, Bastianoni S, Caldeira K (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions due to meat production in the last fifty years. In: Ahmed M, Stockle C (eds) Quantification of climate variability, adaptation and mitigation for agricultural sustainability. Springer, Cham, pp 27–37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • CIE (2013) Australian agricultural emissions projections to 2050. CanberraACT2609

  • Clune S, Crossin E, Verghese K (2017) Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories. J Clean Prod 140:766–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (2014) Water recovery strategy for the murray-darling basin. Commonwealth of Australia

  • Dudley QM, Liska AJ, Watson AK, Erickson GE (2014) Uncertainties in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from US beef cattle. J Clean Prod 75:31–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards-Jones G, Plassmann K, Harris I (2009) Carbon footprinting of lamb and beef production systems: insights from an empirical analysis of farms in Wales, UK. J Agric Sci 147:707–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (1996) Evaluating the uncertainty of emission estimates. Environmental Protection Agency. Accessed 14 Aug 2016

  • EPA (2016) Global greenhouse gas emissions data. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data. Accessed 22 Feb 2017

  • Food Balances (2017) Food and agriculture organization of the united nations statistics division. http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E. Accessed 2017

  • Gardiner G (2008) Accelerating climate change. Department of Parliamentary Services, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett T (2007) Meat and dairy production & consumption—exploring the livestock sector’s contribution to the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions and assessing what less greenhouse gas intensive systems of production and consumption might look like. Food Climate Research Network, Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber P et al (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock—a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland R, Anhang J (2009) Livestock and climate change: What if the key actors in climate change are cows, pigs, and chickens? http://www.worldwatch.org/files/pdf/Livestock%20and%20Climate%20Change.pdf. Accessed 11 Sept 2011

  • Hallström E, Carlsson-Kanyama A, Börjesson P (2015) Environmental impact of dietary change: a systematic review. J Clean Prod 91:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamerschlag K, Group EW (2011) Meat Eater’s guide to climate change + health. Environmental Working Group

  • Hendrie GA, Ridoutt BG, Wiedmann TO, Noakes M (2014) Greenhouse gas emissions and the Australian diet—comparing dietary recommendations with average intakes. Nutrients 6:289–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis—summary for policy makers, Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Geneva

  • Ledgard S, Lieffering M, McDevitt J, Boyes M, Kemp R (2010) A greenhouse gas footprint study for exported New Zealand lamb Report for Meat Industry Association. Ballance Agri-nutrients, Landcorp and MAF AgResearch, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdiarmid JI, Kyle J, Horgan GW, Loe J, Fyfe C, Johnstone A, McNeill G (2012) Sustainable diets for the future: Can we contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by eating a healthy diet? Am J Clin Nutr 96:632–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malça J, Freire F (2011) Uncertainty analysis of the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy renewability of biofuels. INTECH Open Access Publisher

  • Meier T, Christen O (2012) Environmental impacts of dietary recommendations and dietary styles: Germany as an example. Environ Sci Technol 47:877–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak H, Jain N, Bhatia A, Patel J, Aggarwal P (2010) Carbon footprints of Indian food items. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy P, Orikasa T, Thammawong M, Nakamura N, Xu Q, Shiina T (2012) Life cycle of meats: an opportunity to abate the greenhouse gas emission from meat industry in Japan. J Environ Manag 93:218–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rypdal K, Winiwarter W (2001) Uncertainties in greenhouse gas emission inventories—evaluation, comparability and implications. Environ Sci Policy 4:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00113-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe H, Larsen TM, Mogensen L (2013) The global warming potential of two healthy Nordic diets compared with the average Danish diet. Clim Change 116:249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollan N, Moran D, Kim EJ, Thomas C (2010) The environmental impact of meat production systems, Report to the international meat secretariat. UK

  • Springmann M, Godfray HCJ, Rayner M, Scarborough P (2016) Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:4146–4151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). https://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.htm. Accessed 11 Aug 2011

  • Tilman D, Clark M (2014) Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature 515:518–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2016) World development indicators. World Bank. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators#. Accessed 5 Aug 2016

  • Yip CSC, Glenis C, Karnon J (2013) Systematic review of reducing population meat consumption to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and obtain health benefits: effectiveness and models assessments. Int J Public Health 58:683–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia Sau Chun Yip.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 88 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yip, C.S.C., Fielding, R. Cradle-to-cooked-edible-meat analysis of greenhouse gas emissions. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 112, 291–302 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-018-9953-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-018-9953-3

Keywords

Navigation