Abstract
This study aimed to synthesize mean cradle-to-cooked-edible-meat greenhouse gas emission factors for bovine, ovine, pig, and poultry meat through a systematic review process. 64 studies involving 42 countries/regions, published between 1997 and 2015 were identified meeting selection criteria using Cochrane search strategies. Major emission activities were identified and synthesised into a cradle-to-cooked-edible-meat lifecycle system. 270 emission factors were identified from publications and taken as baselines. 67% baseline evaluation boundaries stopped at farm-gate, only 3% at home/restaurants. Baseline emission gaps were identified by comparing baseline evaluation systems against the synthesised system. Emission factors for major activities were identified from publications and mean values were used to fill emission gaps in order to obtain the cradle-to-cooked-edible-meat emission factors, which were then grouped to obtain a mean cradle-to-cooked-edible-meat emission factor for each meat type. Mean emission factors (kg CO2-eq/kg) for adjusted cradle-to-cooked-edible-meats were: Bovine 61.3 (n = 124), Ovine 61.2 (n = 38), Pig 15.8 (n = 56) and Poultry 9.4 (n = 52), which are significantly higher than the adjusted means for carcass at regional-distribution-centre: Bovine 23.9 (n = 118), Ovine 23.3 (n = 9), Pig 5.0 (n = 51) and Poultry 3.6 (n = 45); or the adjusted means for saleable meat at retail: Bovine 32.3 (n = 122), Ovine 31.2 (n = 36), Pig 7.9 (54), and Poultry 4.2 (n = 50). This study confirmed current meat emission evaluations reflect only a fraction of dietary impacts. Emission factors for cooked-edible-meat could be three times the amount of meat commodities at farm-gate. Emission factors vary significantly within and between meat types.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blasing TJ (2017) Recent greenhouse gas concentrations. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/pns/current_ghg.html. Accessed 28 Mar 2018
Carlsson-Kanyama A, González AD (2009) Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change. Am J Clin Nutr 85:1704S–1709S
Caro D, Davis SJ, Bastianoni S, Caldeira K (2014) Global and regional trends in greenhouse gas emissions from livestock. Clim Change 126:203–216
Caro D, Davis SJ, Bastianoni S, Caldeira K (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions due to meat production in the last fifty years. In: Ahmed M, Stockle C (eds) Quantification of climate variability, adaptation and mitigation for agricultural sustainability. Springer, Cham, pp 27–37
CIE (2013) Australian agricultural emissions projections to 2050. CanberraACT2609
Clune S, Crossin E, Verghese K (2017) Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories. J Clean Prod 140:766–783
Department of the Environment (2014) Water recovery strategy for the murray-darling basin. Commonwealth of Australia
Dudley QM, Liska AJ, Watson AK, Erickson GE (2014) Uncertainties in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from US beef cattle. J Clean Prod 75:31–39
Edwards-Jones G, Plassmann K, Harris I (2009) Carbon footprinting of lamb and beef production systems: insights from an empirical analysis of farms in Wales, UK. J Agric Sci 147:707–719
EPA (1996) Evaluating the uncertainty of emission estimates. Environmental Protection Agency. Accessed 14 Aug 2016
EPA (2016) Global greenhouse gas emissions data. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data. Accessed 22 Feb 2017
Food Balances (2017) Food and agriculture organization of the united nations statistics division. http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E. Accessed 2017
Gardiner G (2008) Accelerating climate change. Department of Parliamentary Services, Victoria
Garnett T (2007) Meat and dairy production & consumption—exploring the livestock sector’s contribution to the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions and assessing what less greenhouse gas intensive systems of production and consumption might look like. Food Climate Research Network, Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, UK
Gerber P et al (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock—a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome
Goodland R, Anhang J (2009) Livestock and climate change: What if the key actors in climate change are cows, pigs, and chickens? http://www.worldwatch.org/files/pdf/Livestock%20and%20Climate%20Change.pdf. Accessed 11 Sept 2011
Hallström E, Carlsson-Kanyama A, Börjesson P (2015) Environmental impact of dietary change: a systematic review. J Clean Prod 91:1–11
Hamerschlag K, Group EW (2011) Meat Eater’s guide to climate change + health. Environmental Working Group
Hendrie GA, Ridoutt BG, Wiedmann TO, Noakes M (2014) Greenhouse gas emissions and the Australian diet—comparing dietary recommendations with average intakes. Nutrients 6:289–303
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis—summary for policy makers, Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Geneva
Ledgard S, Lieffering M, McDevitt J, Boyes M, Kemp R (2010) A greenhouse gas footprint study for exported New Zealand lamb Report for Meat Industry Association. Ballance Agri-nutrients, Landcorp and MAF AgResearch, Hamilton
Macdiarmid JI, Kyle J, Horgan GW, Loe J, Fyfe C, Johnstone A, McNeill G (2012) Sustainable diets for the future: Can we contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by eating a healthy diet? Am J Clin Nutr 96:632–639
Malça J, Freire F (2011) Uncertainty analysis of the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy renewability of biofuels. INTECH Open Access Publisher
Meier T, Christen O (2012) Environmental impacts of dietary recommendations and dietary styles: Germany as an example. Environ Sci Technol 47:877–888
Pathak H, Jain N, Bhatia A, Patel J, Aggarwal P (2010) Carbon footprints of Indian food items. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:66–73
Roy P, Orikasa T, Thammawong M, Nakamura N, Xu Q, Shiina T (2012) Life cycle of meats: an opportunity to abate the greenhouse gas emission from meat industry in Japan. J Environ Manag 93:218–224
Rypdal K, Winiwarter W (2001) Uncertainties in greenhouse gas emission inventories—evaluation, comparability and implications. Environ Sci Policy 4:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00113-1
Saxe H, Larsen TM, Mogensen L (2013) The global warming potential of two healthy Nordic diets compared with the average Danish diet. Clim Change 116:249–262
Scollan N, Moran D, Kim EJ, Thomas C (2010) The environmental impact of meat production systems, Report to the international meat secretariat. UK
Springmann M, Godfray HCJ, Rayner M, Scarborough P (2016) Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:4146–4151
Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). https://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.htm. Accessed 11 Aug 2011
Tilman D, Clark M (2014) Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature 515:518–522
World Bank (2016) World development indicators. World Bank. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators#. Accessed 5 Aug 2016
Yip CSC, Glenis C, Karnon J (2013) Systematic review of reducing population meat consumption to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and obtain health benefits: effectiveness and models assessments. Int J Public Health 58:683–693
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yip, C.S.C., Fielding, R. Cradle-to-cooked-edible-meat analysis of greenhouse gas emissions. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 112, 291–302 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-018-9953-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-018-9953-3