Synchrony of net nitrogen mineralization and maize nitrogen uptake following applications of composted and fresh swine manure in the Midwest U.S.
- 415 Downloads
Understanding how the quality of organic soil amendments affects the synchrony of nitrogen (N) mineralization and plant N uptake is critical for optimal agronomic N management and environmental protection. Composting solid livestock manures prior to soil application has been promoted to increase N synchrony; however, few field tests of this concept have been documented. Two years of replicated field trials were conducted near Boone, Iowa to determine the effect of composted versus fresh solid swine manure (a mixture of crop residue and swine urine and feces produced in hoop structures) on Zea mays (maize) N uptake, in situ soil net N mineralization, and soil inorganic N dynamics. Soil applications of composted manure increased maize N accumulation by 25 % in 2000 and 21 % in 2001 compared with fresh manure applications (application rate of 340 kg N ha−1). Despite significant differences in net N mineralization between years, within year seasonal total in situ net N mineralization was similar for composted and fresh manure applications. Partial N budgets indicated that changes in soil N pools (net N mineralization and soil inorganic N) in the surface 20 cm accounted for 67 % of the total plant N accumulation in 2000 but only 16 % in 2001. Inter-annual variation in maize N accumulation could not be attributed to soil N availability. Overall, our results suggest that composting manures prior to soil application has no clear benefit for N synchrony in maize crops. Further work is required to determine the biotic and abiotic factors underlying this result.
KeywordsAsynchrony Corn Midwest Soil fertility Manure management
We would like to thank to Jody Ohmacht, Jay Berkey, Dave Sundberg, and Rhonda Graeffor their invaluable assistance in the field and laboratory. This research was supported by Chamness Technology Inc. and the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture. We also thank two reviewers for thoughtful comments and suggestions.
- Honeyman, Harmon JD, Kliebenstein JB, Richard TL (2001) Feasibility of hoop structures for market swine in Iowa: pig performance, pig environment, and budget analysis. Appl Eng Agric 17:869–874Google Scholar
- IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I. In: Solomon S et al (eds) Fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panal on climate change. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Keeney DR, Nelson DW (1987) Nitrogen–inorganic forms, sec. 33–3, extraction of exchangeable ammonium, nitrate, and nitrite. In: Page et al. (ed) Methods of soil analysis: part 2, chemical and microbiological properties, vol 9. Soil Sci Soc Am, Madison, WI, USA, pp 648–649Google Scholar
- Li H, Wu J (2006) Uncertainty analysis in ecological studies: an overview. In: Wu J, Jones KB, Li H, Loucks OL (eds) Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology: methods and applications. Springer Press, The Netherlands, p 54Google Scholar
- Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2005) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
- Loecke TD, Liebman M, Cambardella CA, Richard TL (2004b) Corn response to composting and time of application of solid swine manure. Agron J 96:214–223Google Scholar
- Robertson GP (1997) Nitrogen use efficiency in row-crop agriculture: crop nitrogen use and soil nitrogen loss. In: Jackson L (ed) Ecology in agriculture. Academic Press, New York, pp 347–365Google Scholar
- Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Eco App 7:737–750Google Scholar