Advertisement

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 77, Issue 3, pp 225–232 | Cite as

Determination of the mineralization of nitrogen from composted chicken manure as affected by temperature

  • A. P. Whitmore
Original Paper

Abstract

Incubations at 5, 10 or 20°C of composted chicken manure in a sand, clay or loam soil consistently released nitrogen. A statistical model fitted to the data confirmed that the temperature dependence followed an Arrhenius pattern. The data were used to test the hypothesis that composted manure behaves more like native soil organic matter than fresh residues and this idea is illustrated with the use of a computer simulation model. Extrapolation of the model results in several climates suggests that about 40% of the organic N in composted chicken manure becomes available to crops during the first year and 6–12% during each subsequent year.

Keywords

Composted chicken manure Soil Incubation temperature Nitrogen Computer model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Rothamsted Research in grant-aided by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. The author is grateful to the Lawes Agricultural Trust for funding, and Landcare Research in New Zealand for hosting, a period of study leave between December 2005 and May 2006 and also gratefully acknowledges the technical assistance of Henk Niers. Part of this research was carried out while the author was employed at what has now become Plant Research International. This article is dedicated to the memory of Remmie Booij.

References

  1. Addiscott TM (1983) Kinetics and temperature relationships of mineralization and nitrification in Rothamsted soils with differing histories. J Soil Sci 34:343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addiscott TM, Whitmore AP (1987) Computer simulation of changes in soil mineral nitrogen and crop nitrogen during autumn, winter and spring. J Agric Sci Camb 109:141–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bitzer CC, Sims JT (1988) Estimating the availability of nitrogen in poultry manure through laboratory and field studies. J Environ Qual 17:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Falloon P, Smith P, Coleman K, Marshall S (1998) Estimating the size of the inert organic matter pool from total soil organic matter content for use in the Rothamsted Carbon model. Soil Biol Biochem 20:1207–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Genstat 5 (1998) Genstat 5, Release 4.1, General statistics package. Committee of the Statistics Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden Herts., UK Released through Numerical Algorithms Group. Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Groot JJR, Verberne ELJ (1991) Response of wheat to nitrogen fertilization, a data set to validate simulation model for nitrogen dynamics in crop and soil. Fert Res 27:349–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hassink J, Whitmore AP (1997) A model of the physical protection of organic matter in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kooistra MJ, Lebbink G, Brussaard L (1989)The Dutch programme on soil ecology of arable farming systems: farm management monitoring programme and general results. Agric Ecosyst Environ 51:7–20Google Scholar
  9. Milieu- en Natuurcompendium (2004) http://www.mnp.nl/mnc/i-nl-(0400)html
  10. Nicolardot B, Fauvet B, Cheneby G (1994) Carbon and nitrogen cycling through soil microbial biomass at various temperatures. Soil Biol Biochem 26:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stephenson AH, McCaskey TA, Ruffin BG (1990) A survey of broiler litter composition and potential value as a nutrient resource. Biol Wastes 34:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ris J, Smilde KW, Wijnen G (1981) Nitrogen fertilizer recommendations for arable crops as based on soil analysis. Fert Res 12:37–52Google Scholar
  13. Vinten AJA, Whitmore AP, Bloem J, Howard R, Wright F (2002) Factors affecting N immobilisation/mineralisation kinetics for cellulose, glucose and straw amended sandy soils. Biol Fert Soils 36:190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Watts CW, Ashman MR, Longstaff DJ, Whalley WR, White RP, Brookes PC, Whitmore AP (2001) Effect of added organic matter and temperature on the aggregation of soil from long-term arable and grassland experiments. Soil Use Manag 17:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Whitmore AP (1996a) Modelling the release and loss of nitrogen after the incorporation of vegetable crop residues. Neth J Agric Sci 44:73–86Google Scholar
  16. Whitmore AP (1996b) Alternative kinetic laws to describe the turnover of the microbial biomass. Plant Soil 181:169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Whitmore AP (1995) Modelling the mineralization and immobilization, leaching and crop uptake of nitrogen during three consecutive years. Ecol model 81:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Whitmore AP (1991) A method for assessing the goodness of computer simulation of soil processes. J Soil Sci 42:289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Whitmore AP, Groot JJR (1997) The decomposition of sugar beet residues: mineralization versus immobilization in contrasting soil types. Plant Soil 192:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Whitmore AP, Gunnewiek HK, Crocker GJ, Klír J, Körschens M, Poulton PR (1997) Modelling the turnover of carbon in soil using the Verberne/MOTOR model. Geoderma 81:137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Whitmore AP, Schröder JJ (1996) Modelling the change in soil organic C and N in response to applications of slurry manure. Plant Soil 184:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Whitmore AP, Groot JJR (1994) The mineralization of N from finely or coarsely chopped crop residues: measurements and modelling. Eur J Agron 3:103–109Google Scholar
  23. Whitmore AP, Coleman KW, Bradbury NJ, Addiscott TM (1991) Simulation of nitrogen in soil and winter wheat crops: modelling nitrogen turnover through organic matter. Fert Res 27:283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rothamsted ResearchHarpenden, HertfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations