Skip to main content
Log in

Critical strain energy release rate for rubbers: single edge notch tension versus pure shear tests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to estimate mode I fracture strain energy release rate of a rubber upon monotonic loadings, the material is submitted to pure shear and single edge notch tension tests. Catastrophic failure happens suddenly for both tests, revealing mirror-like crack surfaces, assessing the fragile fracture. Nonetheless, Griffith failure analysis could be carried out on pure shear tests only. This analysis leads to an energy release rate value that allows challenging approximate expressions existing in the literature for pure shear and single edge notch tension tests. The pure shear approximate expression provides quantities that match the Griffith analysis. Meanwhile, the strain energy release rate values calculated directly from the single edge notch tension tests differ significantly from the values obtained in pure shear. This discrepancy is explored and possible explanations are discussed showing that pure shear tests should be favored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aït Hocine N, Naït Abdelaziz M, Ghfiri H, Mesmacque G (1996) Evaluation of the energy parameter J on rubber-like materials: comparison between experimental and numerical results. Eng Fract Mech 55(6):919–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De D, Gent AN (1996) Tear strength of carbon-black-filled compounds. Rubber Chem Technol 69(5):834–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diani J, Brieu M, Batzler K, Zerlauth P (2015) Effect of the Mullins softening on mode I fracture of carbon-black filled rubbers. Int J Fract 194(1):11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Yaagoubi M, Juhre D, Meier J, Alshuth T, Giese U (2017) Prediction of energy release rate in crack opening mode (mode I) for filled and unfilled elastomers using the Ogden model. Eng Fract Mech 182:74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielle B, Guy L, Albouy PA, Vanel L, Long DR, Sotta P (2011) Effect of tear rotation on ultimate strength in reinforced natural rubber. Macromolecules 44(17):7006–7015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gent AN, Razzaghi-Kashani M, Hamed GR (2003) Why do cracks turn sideways? Rubber Chem Technol 76(1):122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherib S, Chazeau L, Pelletier JM, Satha H (2010) Influence of the filler type on the rupture behavior of filled elastomers. J Appl Polym Sci 118(1):435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greensmith HW (1963) Rupture of rubber. X. The change in stored energy on making a small cut in a test piece held in simple extension. J Appl Polym Sci 7(3):993–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith AA (1921) VI. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 221:163–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamed GR, Park BH (1999) The mechanism of carbon black reinforcement of SBR and NR vulcanizates. Rubber Chem Technol 72(5):946–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DJ, Donovan JA (1985) Critical J-integral and tearing energies for fracture of reinforced natural rubber. Theor Appl Fract Mech 4(2):137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legrain G, Moës N, Verron E (2005) Stress analysis around crack tips in finite strain problems using the extended finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 63(2):290–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley PB (1972) Energy for crack growth in model rubber components. J Strain Anal 7(2):132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marano C, Boggio M, Cazzoni E, Rink M (2014) Fracture phenomenology and toughness of filled natural rubber compounds via the pure shear test specimen. Rubber Chem Technol 87(3):501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin RS, Thomas AG (1953) Rupture of rubber. I. Characteristic energy for tearing. J Polym Sci 10(3):291–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roucou D, Diani J, Brieu M, Witz JF, Mbiakop-Ngassa A (2018) Experimental investigation of elastomer mode I fracture: an attempt to estimate the critical strain energy release rate using SENT tests. Int J Fract 209:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timbrell C, Wiehahn M, Cook G, Muhr AH (2003) Simulation of crack propagation in rubber. In: Proceedings of the third European conference on constitutive models for rubber, pp 11–20

  • Tsunoda K, Busfield JJC, Davies CKL, Thomas AG (2000) Effect of materials variables on the tear behaviour of a non-crystallising elastomer. J Mater Sci 35(20):5187–5198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeoh OH (2002) Relation between crack surface displacements and strain energy release rate in thin rubber sheets. Mech Mater 8(34):459–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Roucou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roucou, D., Diani, J., Brieu, M. et al. Critical strain energy release rate for rubbers: single edge notch tension versus pure shear tests. Int J Fract 216, 31–39 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-00336-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-00336-8

Keywords

Navigation