Skip to main content
Log in

Directionality of electromagnetic radiation from fractures

  • Brief Note
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The directionality of electromagnetic radiation from tensile fracturing is calculated within our previously proposed model and shown to agree with experimental observations in the field. The best locations and orientations of measuring antennas are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balasco M, Lapenna V, Romano G et al (2015) The Pollino 2011–2012 seismic swarm (southern Italy): first results of the M-L=3.6 aftershock recorded by co-located electromagnetic and seismic stations. Boll Geofis Teor Appl 56(2):203–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Frid V, Rabinovitch A, Bahat D (2003) Fracture induced electromagnetic radiation. J Phys D Appl Phys 36:1620–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiling RO, Obermeyer HJ (2010) Natural electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and its application in structural geology and neotectonics. J Geol Soc India 75:278–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AM, Fleming RW, Cruikshank K (1994) Shear zones formed along long, straight traces of fault zones during the 28 June 1992 Landers California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:499–510

  • King RWP (1958) Handbuch der physik, vol XVI. Springer, Goetingen

    Google Scholar 

  • King CY (1983) Electromagnetic emission before earthquake. Nature 301:377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumbholz M, Bock M, Burchart S, Kelka U, Volbrecht A (2012) A critical discussion of the electromagnetic radiation (EMR) method to determine stress orientations within the crust. Solid Earth 3:401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeman JR, Scuderi MM, Marone C et al (2014) On the origin and evolution of electrical signals during frictional stick slip in sheared granular material. J Geophys Res-Solid Earth 119(5):4253–4268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberger MJ (2005) Regional stress field as determined from electromagnetic radiation in a tunnel. J Struct Geol 27:2150–2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberger MJ (2006) Underground measurements of electromagnetic radiation related to stress-induced fractures in the Odenwald Mountains (Germany). Pure Appl Geophys 163:1661–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorrain P, Corson DR (1970) Electromagnetic fields and waves, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogi K (1985) Earthquake prediction. Academic Press, Tokyo 382pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinovitch A, Frid V, Bahat D (2007) Surface oscillations—a possible source of fracture induced electromagnetic radiation. Tectonophysics 431:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song DZ, Wang EY, Song XY, Jin PJ, Oiu LM (2016) Changes in frequency of electromagnetic radiation from Loaded coal Rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Shan JX, Ni ZS, Kai JT (2015) Relationship between earthquake di-latency and electric precursor phenomena. Nat Hazards 79:249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Frid.

Appendix

Appendix

Let t be the time since the beginning of the crack and assume the crack propagates at a constant velocity, v. Consider the crack at time t when its length is \(x=vt\). The contribution to the dipole moment, p at this time from a strip of length \(d{x}^{\prime }\) and width b located at \({x}^{\prime }\) and having a dipole moment of a constant density \(\uprho \) (Fig. 4) is:

$$\begin{aligned}&dp=Re\{2b\rho \hbox {exp}[-\mu (x-{x}^{\prime })/ \hbox {v}]\nonumber \\&\qquad \quad \times \,\hbox {exp}\left[ i\omega \left( {x-{x}^{\prime }} \right) / v \right] \}d{x}^{\prime } \end{aligned}$$
(7)

The factor of 2 comes from the two crack sides; \(\mu \) is the decaying constant (in S\(^{-1}\)) and the time elapsed between its creation and the “present” is \(\left( {x-{x}^{\prime }} \right) / v\) . The total oscillating dipole moment as seen from a distant location is the integral on \({x}^{\prime }\) of dpfrom \({x}^{\prime }=0\) to x:

$$\begin{aligned}&p=Re\left\{ 2b\rho \exp \left( -\frac{\mu x}{v}+i\omega t \right) \right. \nonumber \\&\qquad \quad \times \left. \mathop {\int }\nolimits _0^x \hbox {exp}[(\mu -i\omega ){x}^{\prime }/ v ]d{x}^{\prime }\right\} \end{aligned}$$
(8)

Yielding

$$\begin{aligned} p=Re\left\{ {\frac{2b\rho v}{(\mu -i\omega }\left[ {1-\exp \left( {-\frac{\left( {\mu -i\omega } \right) x}{v}} \right) } \right] } \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(9)

Or

$$\begin{aligned} p=Aexp\left( {-\mu t} \right) \sin (wt+\varphi )+B \end{aligned}$$
(10)

where

$$\begin{aligned} A=\frac{2b\rho v}{\sqrt{(\mu ^{2}+\omega ^{2}}} B=\frac{2b\rho \mu v}{\upmu ^{2}+\omega ^{2}} \end{aligned}$$
(11)

And \(\varphi =arctg\left( {\mu /w} \right) \).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Schematic one wall of the crack at time \(t (= x/v)\) showing x and \({x}^\prime \)

At distances where r \(\gg \lambda \) the only contributions to the radiation comes from\(\ddot{p}\), the second time derivative of the total dipole moment. Thus B is of no consequence and the oscillation is only modified by a change of amplitude and a constant phase addition.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rabinovitch, A., Frid, V. & Bahat, D. Directionality of electromagnetic radiation from fractures. Int J Fract 204, 239–244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-016-0178-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-016-0178-7

Keywords

Navigation