Advertisement

International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 195, Issue 1–2, pp 53–78 | Cite as

Debonding dynamics in FRP plated beams: high order cohesive FE formulation and parametric sensitivity

  • Gilad Mulian
  • Oded Rabinovitch
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper studies the dynamic characteristics of the debonding mechanism in beams strengthened with FRP. The paper formulates a special finite element for the dynamic analysis of the layered beam and looks into the parameters that govern the dynamic phenomenon. The finite element is based on an extended high order theory that incorporates a rich 2D elasticity based stress and displacement fields in the adhesive layer and allows to consider debonding at the two physical interfaces of that layer through cohesive interfaces. These concepts are combined with the basic form of inertial forces to formulate a multi-layered finite element that utilizes the versatility of the FE method and avoids the need to mesh through the thickness of each layer. The computational framework is then used to study the dynamic debonding process and to examine the impact of a series of geometrical, elastic, mechanical, and physical parameters. Among other findings, the investigation reveals the potentially negative impact of stiffening the FRP layer on the dynamic failure, the sensitivity to the properties of the adhesive, and the interesting insensitivity to the loading rate (within the examined range). Finally, the sensitivity of the response to the properties of the cohesive interfaces and the idea of characterizing those interfaces based on dynamic observations are discussed.

Keywords

Structural dynamics Debonding failure Cohesive interface Finite element Extended high order theory Nonlinear analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by The Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 1121/13).

References

  1. Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruno D, Greco F, Lonetti P (2013) A fracture-ALE formulation to predict dynamic debonding in FRP strengthened concrete beams. Compos Part B Eng 46(2013):46–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carpinteri A, Cornetti P, Pugno N (2009a) Edge debonding in FRP strengthened beams: stress versus energy failure criteria. Eng Struct 31(10):2436–2447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpinteri A, Cornetti P, Lacidogna G, Paggi M (2009b) Towards a unified approach for the analysis of failure modes in FRP-retrofitted concrete beams. Adv. Struct. Eng. 12(5):715–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpinteri A, Paggi M, Zavarise G (2005) Snap-back instability in micro-structured composites and its connection with superplasticity. Strength Fract Complex 3(2–4):61–72Google Scholar
  6. Carpinteri A, Paggi M (2010) Analysis of snap-back instability due to end-plate debonding in strengthened beams. J Eng Mech 136(2):199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornetti P, Carpinteri A (2011) Modelling the FRP-concrete delamination by means of an exponential softening law. Eng Struct 33(6):1988–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornetti P, Corrado M, De Lorenzis L, Carpinteri A (2015) An analytical cohesive crack modeling approach to the edge debonding failure of FRP-plated beams. Int J Solids Struct 53:92–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corigliano A, Ricci M (2001) Rate-dependent interface models: formulation and numerical applications. Int J Solids Struct 38(4):547–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corigliano A, Mariani S, Pandolfi A (2003) Numerical modeling of rate-dependent debonding processes in composites. Compos Struct 61(1):39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corigliano A, Mariani S, Pandolfi A (2006) Numerical analysis of rate-dependent dynamic composite delamination. Compos Sci Technol 66(6):766–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Czaderski C, Rabinovitch O (2010) Structural behavior and inter-layer displacements in CFRP plated steel beams—optical measurements, analysis, and comparative verification. Compos Part B Eng 41(4):276–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Lorenzis L, Zavarise G (2008) Modeling of mixed-mode debonding in the peel test applied to superficial reinforcements. Int J Solids Struct 45(20):5419–5436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Lorenzis L, Zavarise G (2009) Cohesive zone modelling of interfacial stresses in plated beams. Int J Solids Struct 46(24):4181–4191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dimitri R, Trullo M, Zavarise G, De Lorenzis L (2014) A consistency assessment of coupled cohesive zone models for mixed-mode debonding problems. Fract Struct Integr 29:266–283Google Scholar
  16. Geissler G, Kaliske M (2010) Time-dependent cohesive zone modelling for discrete fracture simulation. Eng Fract Mech 77(1):153–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jerome DM, Ross CA (1997) Simulation of the dynamic response of concrete beams externally reinforced with carbon-fiber reinforced plastic. Comput Struct 64(5/6):1129–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones RM (1999) Mechanics of composite materials, \(2^{{\rm nd}}\) edition. Taylor & Francis, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  19. Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech Div 85(3):67–94Google Scholar
  20. Perera R, Bueso-Inchausti D (2010) A unified approach for the static and dynamic analyses of intermediate debonding in FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete beams. Compos Struct 92(11):2728–2737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Phan CN, Bailey NW, Kardomateas GA, Battley MA (2012a) Wrinkling of sandwich wide panels/beams based on the extended high-order sandwich panel theory: formulation, comparison with elasticity and experiments. Arch Appl Mech 82(10–11):1585–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Phan CN, Frostig Y, Kardomateas GA (2012b) Analysis of sandwich beams with a compliant core and with in-plane rigidity—extended high-order sandwich panel theory versus elasticity. J Appl Mech 79(041001):1–11Google Scholar
  23. Phan CN, Kardomateas GA, Frostig Y (2012c) Global buckling of sandwich beams based on the extended high-order theory. AIAA J 50(8):1707–1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Qiao P, Chen Y (2008) Cohesive fracture simulation and failure modes of FRP-concrete bonded interfaces. Theor Appl Fract Mech 49(2):213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rabinovitch O, Frostig Y (2000) Closed-form high-order analysis of RC beams strengthened with FRP strips. J Compos Constr 4(2):65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rabinovitch O, Frostig Y (2003) Experiments and analytical comparison of RC beams strengthened with externally bonded CFRP strips. Compos Part B Eng 34(8):663–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rabinovitch O (2008a) Debonding analysis of fiber reinforced polymer strengthened beams: cohesive zone modeling versus a linear elastic fracture mechanics approach. Eng Fract Mech 75(10):2842–2859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rabinovitch O (2008b) Cohesive interface modeling of debonding failure in FRP strengthened beams. J Eng Mech 134(7):578–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rabinovitch O (2010a) Impact of thermal loads on interfacial debonding in FRP strengthened beams. Int J Solids Struct 47(24):3234–3244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rabinovitch O (2012a) Interaction, instability, and simultaneity of debonding processes in flexure of masonry walls strengthened on two sides with FRP. Int J Fract 177(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rabinovitch O (2010b) Buckling-driven debonding in stiff block—compliant joint structural assemblies patched with composite materials. Int J Fract 165(1):21–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rabinovitch O (2012b) Dynamic debonding in concrete beams strengthened with composite materials. Int J Solids Struct 49(26):3641–3658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rabinovitch O (2014a) An extended high order cohesive interface approach for the debonding analysis of FRP strengthened beams. Int J Mech Sci 81:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rabinovitch O (2014b) Dynamic edge debonding in FRP strengthened beams. Eur J Mech 47:309–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reddy JN (1997) On locking-free shear deformable beam finite elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 149(1–4):113–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reddy JN (2002) Energy principles and variational methods in applied mechanics. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberts TM, Haji-Kazemi H (1989) Theoretical study of the behavior of RC eams strengthened by externally bonded steel plates. In: Proceeding of the Institution of Civil Engineering, vol 87, Part 2, pp 39–55Google Scholar
  38. Shen D, Ji Y, Yin F, Zhang J (2015) Dynamic bond stress-slip relationship between basalt FRP sheet and concrete under initial static loading. J Compos Constr 04015012. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000568
  39. Soleiman Fallah A, Mohamed Ali RM, Louca LA (2008) Analytical-numerical study of interfacial stresses in plated beams subjected to pulse loading. Eng Struct 30(3):856–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thamburaj P, Sun JQ (1999) Effect of material anisotropy on the sound and vibration transmission loss of sandwich aircraft structures. J Sandw Struct Mater 1(1):76–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Volokh KY, Needleman A (2002) Buckling of sandwich beams with compliant interfaces. Comput Struct 80(14–15):1329–1335Google Scholar
  42. Wu Y, Jiang C (2013) Quantification of bond-slip relationship for externally bonded FRP-to-concrete joints. J Compos Constr 17(5):673–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xu X-P, Needleman A (1993) Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 1(2):111–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu X-P, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42(9):1397–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringTechnion Israel Institute of TechnologyTechnion CityIsrael

Personalised recommendations