International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 166, Issue 1–2, pp 153–162 | Cite as

On a 3D micromechanical damage model

  • C. Dascalu
  • A. M. Dobrovat
  • M. Tricarico
Original Paper


In the present contribution a 3D two-scale damage model is obtained by asymptotic-developments homogenization, assuming a locally periodic micro-crack distribution. At the microscopic level an energy-based propagation criterion is considered and the macroscopic damage equations are completely deduced through the change of scale procedure. We show that the new damage equations naturally capture microscopic lengths. Their presence in the macroscopic equations leads to size effects, which are investigated in the case of brittle and quasi-brittle damage. The differences with respect to previous results, concerning the 2D case, are pointed out.


Microcrack propagation Damage Homogenization Asymptotic developments Three-dimensional analysis Brittle/quasi-brittle materials 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bazant ZP (1997) Scaling of quasi-brittle fracture: asymptotic analysis. Int J Fract 83: 19–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazant ZP, Planas J (1997) Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  3. COMSOL AB (2006) COMSOL Multiphysics users guide. Version 3.3 DocumentationGoogle Scholar
  4. Dascalu C (2009) A two-scale damage model with material length. C R Mec 337: 645–652ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Dascalu C, Bilbie G (2007) A multiscale approach to damage configurational forces. Int J Fract 147(1-4): 285–294MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dascalu C, Bilbie G, Agiasofitou E (2008) Damage and size effects in solids: a homogenization approach. Int J Solids Struct 45: 409–430MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dascalu C, François B, Keita O (2010) A two-scale model for subcritical damage propagation. Int J Solids Struct 47: 493–502MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freund LB (1998) Dynamic fracture mechanics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Gambin B, Telega JJ (2000) Effective properties of elastic solids with randomly distributed microcracks. Mech Res Commun 27(6): 697–706MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Grechka V, Vasconselos I, Kachanov M (2006) The influence of crack shapes on the effective elasticity of fractured rocks. Geophysics 71(5): D153–D160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leguillon D, Sancez-Palencia E (1982) On the behavior of a cracked elastic body with (or without) friction. J Mec Theor Appl 1: 195–209MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Sanchez-Palencia E (1980) Non-homogeneous media and vibration theory, lecture notes in physics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. Sevostianov I, Kachanov M (2002) On the elastic compliances of irregularly shaped cracks. Int J Fract 114: 245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Truesdell CA, Toupin RA (1960) The classical field theories, handbuch der physik. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire Sols Solides Structures—Risques, UJF, INPG, CNRS UMR 5521Grenoble Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations