Advertisement

International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 144, Issue 1, pp 1–20 | Cite as

Defect propagation at a circular interface

  • Mayue Xie
  • Alan J. Levy
Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper a nonlinear, nonuniform cohesive zone is employed to study the detailed features of quasi-static defect evolution in a simple, planar elastic system consisting of a circular inclusion embedded in an unbounded matrix subject to different remote loading configurations. The inclusion–matrix interface is assumed to be described by Needleman-type force-separation relations characterized by an interface strength, a characteristic force length and a shear stiffness parameter. Interface defects are modeled by an interface strength which varies with interface coordinate. Infinitesimal strain equilibrium solutions, which allow for rigid body inclusion displacement, are sought by eigenfunction approximation of the solution of the governing interfacial integral equations. For equibiaxial tension, quasi-static defect initiation and propagation occur under increasing remote load. For decreasing characteristic force length, a transition occurs from more or less uniform decohesion along the bond line to propagation of a crack-like defect. In the later case a critical failure load is well defined and interface failure is shown to be defect dominated (brittle decohesion). For interfaces with large characteristic force length, the matrix “lifts off” the inclusion accompanied by a delay in defect propagation (ductile decohesion). The decohesion modes ultimately give rise to a cavity with the inclusion situated within it on the side opposite to the original defect. Results for small characteristic force length show consistency with England’s results for the sharp arc crack on a circular interface (England AH (1966) ASME J Appl Mech 33:637–640) Stress oscillation and contact at the tip of the defect are observed primarily for small characteristic force lengths under extremely small loading. Results for remote tension, compression and pure shear loading are discussed as well. In the final section of the paper the results obtained in the first part are utilized to estimate the plane effective bulk response of a composite containing a dilute distribution of inclusions with randomly oriented interface defects.

Keywords

Interfacial debonding and decohesion Cohesive zones Cavity nucleation Inclusion problem Crack growth Effective composite properties 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdul-Baqi A and van der Giessen E (2001). Delamination of a strong film from a ductile substrate during indentation unloading. J Mater Res 16: 1396–1407 ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Aboudi J (1991). Mechanics of composite materials. Elsevier, Amsterdam MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Achenbach JD, Keer LM, Khetan RP and Chen SH (1979). Loss of adhesion at the tip of an interface crack. J Elasticity 9: 397–424 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barenblatt GI (1962). The mathematical theory of equilibrium of cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7: 55–129 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beltz GE and Rice JR (1991). Dislocation nucleation versus cleavage decohesion at crack tips. In: Lowe, TC, Rollett, AD, Follansbee, PS and Daehn, GS (eds) Modeling the deformation of crystalline solids, pp 457–480. Warrendale, Pennsylvania Google Scholar
  6. Bozzolo G, Ferrante J and Smith JR (1991). Universal behavior in ideal slip. Scripta Metall 25: 1927–1931 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Comninou M (1977). The interface crack. ASME J Appl Mech 44: 631–636 MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Comninou M (1990). An overview of interface cracks. Engng Fract Mech 37: 197–208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dugdale DS (1960). Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8: 100–104 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong Z and Levy AJ (2000). Mean field estimates of the response of fiber composites with nonlinear interface. Mech Mater 32: 739–767 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. England AH (1965). A crack between dissimilar media. ASME J Appl Mech 32: 400–402 Google Scholar
  12. England AH (1966). An arc crack around a circular elastic inclusion. ASME J Appl Mech 33: 637–640 Google Scholar
  13. Erdogan F (1965). Stress distribution in bonded dissimilar materials with cracks. ASME J Appl Mech 32: 403–410 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferrante J, Smith JR and Rose JH (1982). Universal binding energy relations in metallic adhesion. In: Georges, JM (eds) Microscopic aspects of adhesion and lubrication, pp 19–30. Elsevier, Amsterdam Google Scholar
  15. Frenkel J (1926). Zur Theorie der Elastizitatsgrenze und der Festigkeit Kristdlinischer Korper. Zeitschrift Fur Physik 37: 572–609 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Levy AJ (1996). The effective dilatational response of fiber reinforced composites with nonlinear interface. ASME J Appl Mech 63: 357–364 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levy AJ (1998). The effect of interfacial shear on cavity formation at an elastic inhomogenneity. J Elasticity 50: 49–85 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Levy AJ (2000a). The fiber composite with nonlinear interface-part I: axial tension. ASME J Appl Mech 67: 727–732 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levy AJ (2000b). The fiber composite with nonlinear interface-part II: antiplane shear. ASME J Appl Mech 67: 733–739 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levy AJ (2001). A finite strain analysis of cavity formation at a rigid inhomogeneity. J Elasticity 64: 131–156 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Levy AJ (2002). Separation phenomena at the interface of a finitely deformed composite sphere. Int J Solids Struct 39: 5813–5835 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levy AJ (2003). Bifurcation phenomena in the rigid inclusion power law matrix composite sphere. Int J Solids Struct 40: 2535–2561 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levy AJ, Shukla A and Xie M (2006). Bending and buckling of a class of nonlinear fiber composite rods. J Mech Phys Solids 54: 1064–1092 CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Malyshev BM and Salganik RL (1965). The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks. Int J Fract 1: 114–127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Needleman A (1987). A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. ASME J Appl Mech 54: 525–531 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Needleman A (1990a). An analysis of decohesion along an imperfect interface. Int J Fract 42: 21–40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Needleman A (1990b). An analysis of tensile decohesion along an interface. J Mech Phys Solids 38: 289–324 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Nemat-Nasser S and Hori M (1999a). Micromechanics: overall properties of heterogeneous materials. North-Holland, Amsterdam Google Scholar
  29. Rice JR and Sih GC (1965). Plane problems of cracks in dissimilar media. ASME J Appl Mech 32: 418–423 Google Scholar
  30. Tvergaard V (1990). Effect of fiber debonding in a Whisker-reinforced metal. Mater Sci Eng A 125: 203–213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams ML (1959). The stresses around a fault or crack in dissimilar media. Bull Seismol Soc Am 49: 199–204 Google Scholar
  32. Xie M (2005) Interface problems in micromechanics and effective composite property analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, Syracuse University, NYGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu XP and Needleman A (1993). Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix. Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng 1: 111–132 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Intel CorporationChandlerUSA

Personalised recommendations