International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 143, Issue 4, pp 333–354 | Cite as

Modelling cohesive crack growth using a two-step finite element-scaled boundary finite element coupled method

Original Paper


A two-step method, coupling the finite element method (FEM) and the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM), is developed in this paper for modelling cohesive crack growth in quasi-brittle normal-sized structures such as concrete beams. In the first step, the crack trajectory is fully automatically predicted by a recently-developed simple remeshing procedure using the SBFEM based on the linear elastic fracture mechanics theory. In the second step, interfacial finite elements with tension-softening constitutive laws are inserted into the crack path to model gradual energy dissipation in the fracture process zone, while the elastic bulk material is modelled by the SBFEM. The resultant nonlinear equation system is solved by a local arc-length controlled solver. Two concrete beams subjected to mode-I and mixed-mode fracture respectively are modelled to validate the proposed method. The numerical results demonstrate that this two-step SBFEM-FEM coupled method can predict both satisfactory crack trajectories and accurate load-displacement relations with a small number of degrees of freedom, even for crack growth problems with strong snap-back phenomenon. The effects of the tensile strength, the mode-I and mode-II fracture energies on the predicted load-displacement relations are also discussed.


Finite element method Scaled boundary finite element method Cohesive crack model Mixed-mode crack propagation Concrete beams Arc-length method 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arrea M, Ingraffea AR (1982) Mixed-mode crack propagation in mortar and concrete. Report No. 81-13: Department of Structural Engineering, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
  2. Bittencourt TN, Wawrzynek PA, Ingraffea AR and Sousa JL (1996). Quasi-automatic simulation of crack propagation for 2D LEFM problems. Eng Fract Mech 55(2): 321–334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bocca P, Carpinteri A and Valente S (1991). Mixed-mode fracture of concrete. Int J Solid Struct 27(9): 1139–1153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpinteri A (1982). Notch sensitivity in fracture testing of aggregative materials. Eng Fract Mech 16: 467–481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpinteri A and Colombo G (1989). Numerical analysis of catastrophic softening behavior (snap-back instability). Comput Struct 31(4): 607–636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpinteri A, Valente S, Ferrara G and Melchiorri G (1993). Is mode II fracture energy a real material property. Comput Struct 48(3): 397–413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cendon DA, Galvez JC, Elices M and Planas J (2000). Modelling the fracture of concrete under mixed loading. Int J Fract 103: 293–310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deeks AJ (2004). Prescribed side-face displacements in the scaled boundary finite-element method. Comput Struct 82(15-16): 1153–1165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deeks AJ and Wolf JP (2002). A virtual work derivation of the scaled boundary finite-element method for elastostatics. Computat Mech 28(6): 489–504 MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Erdogan F and Sih GC (1963). On the crack extension in plate under in plane loading and transverse shear. ASME J Basic Eng 85(4): 519–527 Google Scholar
  11. Galvez JC, Cervenka J, Cendon DA and Saouma V (2002). A discrete crack approach to normal/shear cracking of concrete. Cement Concrete Res 32: 1567–1585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galvez JC, Elices M, Guinea GV and Planas J (1998). Mixed mode fracture of concrete under proportional and nonproportional loading. Int J Fract 94: 267–284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hillerborg A, Modeer M and Petersson P (1976). Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement Concrete Res 6: 773–782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang R, Sukumar N and Prevost JH (2003). Modeling quasi-static crack growth with the extended finite element method Part II: Numerical applications. Int J Solids Struct 40(26): 7539–7552 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hussain MA, Pu SL, Underwood JH (1974) Strain energy release rate for a crack under combined mode I and II. Fracture Analysis, STP 560, ASTMGoogle Scholar
  16. Mariani S and Perego U (2003). Extended finite element method for quasi-brittle fracture. Int J Numerical Methods Eng 58: 103–126 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. May IM and Duan Y (1997). A local arc-length procedure for strain softening. Comput Struct 64(1-4): 297–303 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moes N and Belytschko T (2002). Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth. Eng Fract Mech 69(7): 813–833 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Petersson PE (1981) Crack growth and development of fracture zone in plain concrete and similar materials. Report TVBM-1006, Lund Inst of tech, Lund, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  20. Rots J and De Borst R (1987). Analysis of mixed-mode fracture in concrete. ASCE J Eng Mech 113(11): 1739–1758 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saleh AL and Aliabadi MH (1995). Crack growth analysis in concrete using boundary element method. Eng Fract Mech 51: 533–545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sih GC (1974). Strain-energy-density factor applied to mixed-mode crack problems. Int J Fract 10(3): 305–321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Song CM and Wolf JP (2002). Semi-analytical representation of stress singularities as occurring in cracks in anisotropic multi-materials with the scaled boundary finite-element method. Comput Struct 80(2): 183–197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Swenson D and Ingraffea AR (1991). The collapse of the Schoharie Creek Bridge: a case study in concrete fracture mechanics. Int J Fract 51: 73–92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vu TH and Deeks AJ (2006). Use of higher-order shape functions in the scaled boundary finite element method. Int J Numerical Methods Eng 54(4): 585–605 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. Wawrzynek PA and Ingraffea AR (1989). An interactive approach to local remeshing around a propagation crack. Finite Element Anal Design 5: 87–96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wells GN and Sluys LJ (2000). Three-dimensional embedded discontinuity model for brittle fracture. Int J Solids Struct 38(5): 897–913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolf JP (2003). The scaled boundary finite element method. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester Google Scholar
  29. Wolf JP and Song CM (1996). Finite-element modelling of unbounded media. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Xie M (1995) Finite element modelling of discrete crack propagation, PhD. Thesis: University of New Mexico, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. Xie M and Gerstle WH (1995). Energy-based cohesive crack propagation modelling. ASCE J Eng Mech 121(12): 1349–1458 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xie M, Gerstle WH and Rahulkumar P (1995). Energy-based automatic mixed-mode crack propagation modelling. ASCE J Eng Mech 121(8): 914–923 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang ZJ (2006). Fully automatic modelling of mixed-mode crack propagation using scaled boundary finite element method. Eng Fract Mech 73(12): 1711–1731 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang ZJ and Chen JF (2004). Fully automatic modelling of cohesive discrete crack propagation in concrete beams using local arc-length methods. Int J Solids Struct 41(3-4): 801–826 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang ZJ and Chen JF (2005). Finite element modelling of multiple discrete cohesive crack propagation in reinforced concrete beams. Eng Fract Mech 72(14): 2280–2297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang ZJ and Proverbs D (2004). A comparative study of numerical solutions to nonlinear discrete crack modelling of concrete beams involving sharp snap-back. Eng Fract Mech 71(1): 81–105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EngineeringThe University of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.School of Civil and Resource EngineeringThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations