Abstract
The traditional standard quantum mechanics theory is unable to solve the spin–statistics problem, i.e. to justify the utterly important “Pauli Exclusion Principle”. A complete and straightforward solution of the spin–statistics problem is presented on the basis of the “conformal quantum geometrodynamics” theory. This theory provides a Weyl-gauge invariant formulation of the standard quantum mechanics and reproduces successfully all relevant quantum processes including the formulation of Dirac’s or Schrödinger’s equation, of Heisenberg’s uncertainty relations and of the nonlocal EPR correlations. When the conformal quantum geometrodynamics is applied to a system made of many identical particles with spin, an additional constant property of all elementary particles enters naturally into play: the “intrinsic helicity”. This property, not considered in the Standard Quantum Mechanics, determines the correct spin–statistics connection observed in Nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This similarity induced Weyl to identify \(\phi _i\) with the e.m. four potential to obtain an unified theory for electromagnetism and gravitation [35]. This approach however was unsuccessful and nowadays we know that e.m. forces are unified with weak nuclear forces, instead.
As it is well known, Bohm considers the coupled equations for modulus and phase of the wavefunction \(\Psi \) obtained from the wave equation (Klein–Gordon, Schrödinger) of the SQM. Bohm’s coupled equations have the form of a continuity equation for the density \(\rho =|\Psi |^2\) and of a Hamilton–Jacobi equation with suitable “ quantum potential” depending on \(\rho \) added to. Now, a closer inspection into Eq. (3) shows that the second equation has the form of a continuity equation for the density \(\rho =|\Psi |^2=|A|^2e^{(n-2)\phi }\) [cfr. Eq. (5)] and the first equation has the form of the Hamilton–Jacobi equation with potential given by the Weyl scalar curvature. Now Eq. (2) with \(\phi _i=\partial _i\phi \) shows that the second term on the right has the same form of Bohm’s quantum potential. It is then not surprising that Bohm’s ansatz can be used to transform Eq. (3) into the linear wave Eq. (4) [30, 33]. However, as said in the text, Eq. (4) is not a wave equation of the SQM.
In Bohm’s approach, the spin is described by the coupled equations of modulus and phase of each component of the spinor [6]. We then have four Bohm’s coupled equations for Pauli spinors and eight Bohm’s coupled equations for Dirac spinors. In this case, Bohmian quantum mechanics and CQG are mutually at variance.
The same mathematical method is used, for example, in \((4+N)\)-Kaluza Klein approach to gravitational plus Yang–Mills theory [27].
We may think of \(ma^2\) as the particle moment of inertia and of \(a\) as the gyration radius.
The square modulus of \(\Phi _s\) is given by
$$\begin{aligned} |\Phi _s|^2= & {} \cos ^2\frac{\beta }{2}|\psi ^\uparrow (\varvec{r},t)|^2 + \sin ^2\frac{\beta }{2}|\psi ^\downarrow (\varvec{r},t)|^2 +\nonumber \\&+\cos \frac{\beta }{2}\sin \frac{\beta }{2}[\psi ^{\uparrow *}(\varvec{r},t)\psi ^\downarrow (\varvec{r},t)+\psi ^\uparrow (\varvec{r},t)\psi ^{\downarrow *}(\varvec{r},t)] \end{aligned}$$(20)The terminology is taken from the similar factorization of the Lorentz group into rotations and boosts.
References
Atre, M.V., Mukunda, N.: Classical particles with internal structure: general formalism and application to first-order internal spaces. J. Math. Phys. 27, 2908–2919 (1986)
Balachandran, A.P., Daughton, A., Gu, Z.C., Sorkin, R.D., Marmo, G., Srivastava, A.M.: Spin-statistics theorems without relativity or field theory. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 8(17), 2993–3044 (1993). doi:10.1142/S0217751X93001223. http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217751X93001223
Biedenharn, L.C., Dam, H.V., Marmo, G., Morandi, G., Mukunda, N., Samuel, J., Sudarshan, E.C.G.: Classical models for Regge trajectories. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2, 1567–1589 (1987)
Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “Hidden” variables I. Phys. Rev. 85(2), 166–179 (1952). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.85.166
Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “Hidden” variables II. Phys. Rev. 85(2), 180–193 (1952). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.85.180
Bohm, D., Hiley, B.J.: The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. Routledge, London (1995)
Chew, G.F., Frautschi, S.C.: Regge trajectories and the principle of maximum strength for strong interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 41–44 (1962)
Davydov, A.S.: Quantum Mechanics, 2, edition edn. Pergamon Pr, Oxford (1976)
De Broglie, L., Andrade e Silva, J.L.: La réinterprétation de la mécanique ondulatoire. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1971)
De Martini, F., Santamato, E.: Derivation of Dirac’s equation from conformal differential geometry. In: D’Ariano, M., Fei, S.M., Haven, E., Hiesmayr, B., Jaeger, G., Khrennikov, A., Larsson, J.Å. (eds.) Foundations of Probability and Physics 6, vol. 1424, pp. 45–54. AIP Conference Proceedings 2012, (2011). doi:10.1063/1.3688951
De Martini, F., Santamato, E.: Interpretation of quantum nonlocality by conformal quantum geometrodynamics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53(10), 3308–3322 (2014). doi:10.1007/s10773-013-1651-y. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10773-013-1651-y
De Martini, F., Santamato, E.: Nonlocality, no-signalling, and Bell’s theorem investigated by Weyl conformal differential geometry. Phys. Scr. T163, 014015 (2014). doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2014/T163/014015
Dirac, P.A.M.: Long range forces and broken symmetries. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 333, 403–418 (1973)
Duck, I., Sudarshan, E.C.G.: Toward an understanding of the spin-statistics theorem. Am. J. Phys. 66(4), 284–303 (1998). doi:10.1119/1.18860
Duck, I., Sudarshan, E.C.G., Wightman, A.S.: Pauli and the spin-statistics theorem. Am. J. Phys. 67(8), 742–746 (1999). doi:10.1119/1.19365
Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., Sands, M.L.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol. III. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City (1989)
Goldstein, H.: Classical Mechanics. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading (1980)
Hehl, F., Lemk, J., Mielke, E.: Two lectures on fermions and gravity. In: Debrus, J., Hirshfeld, A. (eds.) Geometry and Theoretical Physics, Bad Honnef Lectures, 12–16 Feb, pp. 56–140. Springer, Berlin (1991)
Hochberg, D., Plunien, G.: Theory of matter in Weyl spacetime. Phys. Rev. D 43, 3358–3367 (1991). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3358
Jabs, A.: Addendum to: connecting spin and statistics in quantum mechanics. Found. Phys. 40(7), 793–794 (2010). doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9351-4
Jabs, A.: Connecting spin and statistics in quantum mechanics. Found. Phys. 40(7), 776–792 (2010)
Khrennikov, A.: Towards a field model of prequantum reality. Found. Phys. 42(6), 725–741 (2011). doi:10.1007/s10701-011-9611-y. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10701-011-9611-y
Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M., Watanabe, N.: Quantum probability from classical signal theory. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 09(supp01), 281–292 (2011). doi:10.1142/S0219749911007289. http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219749911007289
Lord, E.A.: Tensors, Relativity and Cosmology. McGraw-Hill, New York (1979)
Quigg, C.: Gauge Theories of the Strong. Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions. Benjamin, Menlo Park (1983)
Romer, R.H.: The spin-statistics theorem. Am. J. Phys. 70(8), 791–791 (2002). doi:10.1119/1.1482064
Salam, A., Strathdee, J.: On Kaluza-Klein theory. Ann. Phys. 141(2), 316–352 (1982). doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90291-3
Santamato, E.: Geometric derivation of the Schrödinger equation from classical mechanics in curved Weyl spaces. Phys. Rev. D 29(2), 216–222 (1984). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.29.216
Santamato, E.: Statistical interpretation of the Kleinâ Gordon equation in terms of the spaceâ time Weyl curvature. J. Math. Phys. 25(8), 2477–2480 (1984). doi:10.1063/1.526467. http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jmp/25/8/10.1063/1.526467
Santamato, E.: Gauge-invariant statistical mechanics and average action principle for the Klein-Gordon particle in geometric quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. D 32(10), 2615–2621 (1985). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.32.2615
Santamato, E.: Heisenberg uncertainty relations and average space curvature in geometric quantum mechanics. Phys. Lett. A 130(4–5), 199–202 (1988). doi:10.1016/0375-9601(88)90593-2. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375960188905932
Santamato, E., De Martini, F.: Solving the nonlocality riddle by conformal quantum geometrodynamics. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 10(08), 1241013 (2012). doi:10.1142/S0219749912410134. http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219749912410134
Santamato, E., De Martini, F.: Derivation of the Dirac equation by conformal differential geometry. Found. Phys. 43, 631–641 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10701-013-9703-y
Taylor, J.R.: Classical Mechanics. University Science Books, Sausalito (2005)
Weyl, H.: Gravitation und elektrizität. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys. Math. K1, 465–480 (1918). Reprinted. In: The Principles of Relativity (Dover, New York, 1923)
Weyl, H.: Space, Time, Matter, 4th edn. Dover Publications Inc, New York (1952)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santamato, E., De Martini, F. Proof of the Spin–Statistics Theorem. Found Phys 45, 858–873 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9912-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9912-7