Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 45, Issue 9, pp 1046–1062 | Cite as

Observability, Visualizability and the Question of Metaphysical Neutrality

  • Johanna WolffEmail author
Article
  • 136 Downloads

Abstract

Theories in fundamental physics are unlikely to be ontologically neutral, yet they may nonetheless fail to offer decisive empirical support for or against particular metaphysical positions. I illustrate this point by close examination of a particular objection raised by Wolfgang Pauli against Hermann Weyl. The exchange reveals that both parties to the dispute appeal to broader epistemological principles to defend their preferred metaphysical starting points. I suggest that this should make us hesitant to assume that in deriving metaphysical conclusions from physical theories we place our metaphysical theories on a purely empirical foundation. The metaphysics within a particular physical theory may well be the result of a priori assumptions in the background, not particular empirical findings.

Keywords

Weyl Pauli Interpreting physics Continuum Field concept 

References

  1. 1.
    Bell, J.L.: Hermann Weyl on intuition and the continuum. Philos. Math. 8(3), 259–273 (2000)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Born, M : The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics. In: Nobel Foundation (ed) Nobel Lectures: Physics, pp. 1942–1964. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1955)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Born, M., Born, I., Heisenberg, W., Russell, B.: The Born–Einstein Letters. MacMillan, London (1971)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bridgman, P.: The Logic of Modern Physics. MacMillan, London (1927)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Einstein, A.: Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Ann. der Phys. 322, 891–921 (1905)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman, M.: Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heisenberg, W.: Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Physik 33, 879–893 (1925)zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hermann, A., Meyenn, K.V., Weisskopf, V.F.: Wolfgang Pauli: Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel mit Bohr, Einstein, Heisenberg u.a., pp. 1919–1929. Springer, New York (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ladyman, J., Ross, D.: Every Thing Must Go. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mehra, J., Rechenberg, H.: The Historical Development of Quantum Theory. Springer, New York (1982a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mehra, J., Rechenberg, H.: The Historical Development of Quantum Theory. Springer, New York (1982b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pauli, W.: Merkurperihelbewegung und Strahlenablenkung in Weyls Gravitationstheorie. Verhandlungen der Dtschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft 21, 742–750 (1919)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pauli, W.: Relativitätstheorie. In: Sommerfeld, A. (ed.) Enzyklopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften, pp. 539–775. Teubner, Bockau (1920)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pauli, W.: Space, time and causality in modern physics. In: Wolfgang, W. (ed.) Writings on Physics and Philosophy. Springer, New York (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ryckman, T.: The Reign of Relativity: Philosophy in Physics 1915–1925. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scholz, E.: Hermann Weyl on the concept of continuum. In: Hendricks, V., Pedersen, S.A., Jørgensen, K.F. (eds.) Proof Theory: History and Philosophical Significance, pp. 195–217. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sieroka, N.: Geometrization versus transcendent matter: a systematic historiography of theories of matter following Weyl. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 61, 769–802 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Atten, M., van Dalen, D., Tieszen, R.: Brouwer and Weyl: the phenomenology and mathematics of the intuitive continuum. Philos. Math. 10(3), 203–226 (2002)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Fraassen, B.: Quantum Mechanics. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wallace, D.: Taking particle physics seriously: a critique of the algebraic approach to quantum field theory. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 42, 116–125 (2011)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weyl, H.: Das Kontinuum: Kritische Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Analysis. Metzger und Wittig, Leipzig (1918)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weyl, H.: Raum, Zeit, Materie, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (1919)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyThe University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations