Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 43, Issue 8, pp 923–947 | Cite as

Contrasting Classical and Quantum Vacuum States in Non-inertial Frames

  • Timothy H. BoyerEmail author
Article

Abstract

Classical electron theory with classical electromagnetic zero-point radiation (stochastic electrodynamics) is the classical theory which most closely approximates quantum electrodynamics. Indeed, in inertial frames, there is a general connection between classical field theories with classical zero-point radiation and quantum field theories. However, this connection does not extend to noninertial frames where the time parameter is not a geodesic coordinate. Quantum field theory applies the canonical quantization procedure (depending on the local time coordinate) to a mirror-walled box, and, in general, each non-inertial coordinate frame has its own vacuum state. In particular, there is a distinction between the “Minkowski vacuum” for a box at rest in an inertial frame and a “Rindler vacuum” for an accelerating box which has fixed spatial coordinates in an (accelerating) Rindler frame. In complete contrast, the spectrum of random classical zero-point radiation is based upon symmetry principles of relativistic spacetime; in empty space, the correlation functions depend upon only the geodesic separations (and their coordinate derivatives) between the spacetime points. The behavior of classical zero-point radiation in a noninertial frame is found by tensor transformations and still depends only upon the geodesic separations, now expressed in the non-inertial coordinates. It makes no difference whether a box of classical zero-point radiation is gradually or suddenly set into uniform acceleration; the radiation in the interior retains the same correlation function except for small end-point (Casimir) corrections. Thus in classical theory where zero-point radiation is defined in terms of geodesic separations, there is nothing physically comparable to the quantum distinction between the Minkowski and Rindler vacuum states. It is also noted that relativistic classical systems with internal potential energy must be spatially extended and can not be point systems. The classical analysis gives no grounds for the “heating effects of acceleration through the vacuum” which appear in the literature of quantum field theory. Thus this distinction provides (in principle) an experimental test to distinguish the two theories.

Keywords

Non-inertial frames Stochastic electrodynamics Quantum field theory Thermal effects of acceleration Classical zero-point radiation 

References

  1. 1.
    Boyer, T.H.: Any classical description of nature requires classical electromagnetic zero-point radiation. Am. J. Phys. 79, 1163–1167 (2011) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de la Pena, L., Cetto, A.M.: The Quantum Dice: An Introduction to Stochastic Electrodynamics. Kluwer, Boston (1996) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyer, T.H.: Random electrodynamics: the theory of classical electrodynamics with classical electromagnetic zero-point radiation. Phys. Rev. 11, 790–808 (1975) ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyer, T.H.: General connection between random electrodynamics and quantum electrodynamics for free electromagnetic fields and for dipole oscillator systems. Phys. Rev. D 11, 809–830 (1975) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marshall, T.W.: Statistical electrodynamics. Proc. Camb. Philol. Soc. 61, 537–546 (1965) ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyer, T.H.: Derivation of the blackbody radiation spectrum without quantum assumptions. Phys. Rev. 182, 1374–11383 (1969) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyer, T.H.: Conformal symmetry of classical electromagnetic zero-point radiation. Found. Phys. 19, 349–365 (1989) MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boyer, T.H.: Classical and quantum interpretations regarding thermal behavior in a coordinate frame accelerating through zero-point radiation. arXiv:1011.1426
  9. 9.
    Goldstein, H.: Classical Mechanics, 2nd edn., pp. 575–578. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1981) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boyer, T.H.: Classical physics of thermal scalar radiation in two spacetime dimensions. Am. J. Phys. 79, 644–656 (2011) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boyer, T.H.: Derivation of the Planck spectrum for relativistic classical scalar radiation from thermal equilibrium in an accelerating frame. Phys. Rev. D 81, 105024 (2010) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boyer, T.H.: The blackbody radiation spectrum follows from zero-point radiation and the structure of relativistic spacetime in classical physics. Found. Phys. 42, 595–614 (2012) ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boyer, T.H.: Classical statistical thermodynamics and electromagnetic zero-point radiation. Phys. Rev. 186, 1304–1318 (1969) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rindler, W.: Essential Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1977). pp. 51–59, 156 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rindler, W.: Kruskal space and the uniformly accelerated frame. Am. J. Phys. 34, 1174–1178 (1966) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schutz, B.F.: A First Course in General Relativity. Cambridge, London (1985), p. 150 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hamilton, J.D.: The uniformly accelerated reference frame. Am. J. Phys. 46, 83–89 (1978) MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Meter, J.R., Carlip, S., Hartemann, F.V.: Reflection of plane waves from a uniformly accelerating mirror. Am. J. Phys. 69, 783–787 (2001) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Greenberg, M.D.: Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1998). Sect. 17.7 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matthews, J., Walker, R.L.: Mathematical Methods of Physics, 2nd edn. Benjamin/Cummins, Reading (1970). pp. 264, 338 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gradshteyn, I.S., Ryzhik, I.M.: Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products, p. 494. Academic Press, New York (1965). \(\int^{\infty}_{0} dxx^{2m} \sin bx/(e^{x}-1)=(-1)^{m}\partial^{2m}/\partial b^{2m} [ (\pi/2)\coth b\pi-(1/2b)]\), (b>0) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carroll, S.: Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity, pp. 394–402. Addison-Wesley Longman, Reading (2003) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fulling, S.A.: Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Riemannian space-time. Phys. Rev. D 7, 2850–2862 (1973) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Davies, P.C.: Scalar particle production in Schwarzschild and Rindler metrics. J. Phys. A 8, 609–616 (1975) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Unruh, W.G.: Notes on blackhole evaporation. Phys. Rev. D 14, 870–892 (1976) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alsing, P.M., Milonni, P.W.: Simplified derivation of the Hawking-Unruh temperature for an accelerated observer in vacuum. Am. J. Phys. 72, 1524–1529 (2004) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Crispino, L.C.B., Higuchi, A., Matsas, G.E.A.: The Unruh effect and its applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 787–838 (2008) MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boyer, T.H.: Thermal effects of acceleration through random classical radiation. Phys. Rev. D 21, 2137–2148 (1980) MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boyer, T.H.: Thermal effects of acceleration for a classical dipole oscillator in classical electromagnetic zero-point radiation. Phys. Rev. D 29, 1089–1095 (1984) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cole, D.C.: Properties of a classical charged harmonic oscillator accelerated through classical electromagnetic zero-point radiation. Phys. Rev. D 31, 1972–1981 (1985) MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boyer, T.H.: Thermal effects of acceleration for a classical spinning magnetic dipole in classical electromagnetic zero-point radiation. Phys. Rev. D 30, 1228–1232 (1984) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boyer, T.H.: Example of mass-energy relation: classical hydrogen atom accelerated or supported in a gravitational field. Am. J. Phys. 66, 872–876 (1998) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsCity College of the City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations