Abstract
It is shown that a newly derived “exact expression” for radiation of an accelerated charge in the recent literature is simply incorrect, having arisen because of a wrong relativistic transformation of the distance parameter. The ensuing claim that the newly derived expression alone satisfies the energy conservation for the electromagnetic radiation, is based on a wrong reasoning where a proper distinction between the time during which the radiation is received and the time for emission (retarded time of the charge) was not maintained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Huang, Y.-S., Lu, K.-H.: Exact expression for radiation of an accelerated charge in classical electrodynamics. Found. Phys. 38, 151–159 (2008)
Huang, Y.-S.: Is the current formulation of the radiation of an accelerated charge valid? Nuovo Cimento 124, 925–929 (2009)
Singal, A.K.: A first principles derivation of the electromagnetic fields of a point charge in arbitrary motion. Am. J. Phys. 79, 1036–1041 (2011)
Jackson, J.D.: Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1975). Chap. 14
Griffiths, D.J.: Introduction to Electrodynamics, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1989). Chap. 9
Panofsky, W.K.H., Phillips, M.: Classical Electricity and Magnetism, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1962). Chap. 20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singal, A.K. Comment on “Exact Expression for Radiation of an Accelerated Charge in Classical Electrodynamics”. Found Phys 43, 267–270 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-012-9694-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-012-9694-0