Skip to main content
Log in

The Problem of Interpretation of Modern Physics

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the advent of Modern Physics in 1905, we observe an increasing activity of “interpreting” the new theories. We mention here the theories of Special Relativity, General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. However, similar activities for the theories of Classical Physics were not known. We ask for the reasons for the different ways to treat classical physics and modern physics. The answer, that we provide here is very surprising: the different treatments are based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the theories of classical physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birkhoff, G., von Neumann, J.: The logic of quantum mechanics. Ann. Math. 37, 823–843 (1936)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohr, N.: The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature 121, 580–590 (1928). Das Quantenpostulat und die neuere Entwicklung der Atomistik. Die Naturwissenschaften 16, 245–257 (1928)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohr, N.: On the notion of causality and complementarity. Dialectica 2, 312–319 (1948)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Busch, P., Lahti, P., Mittelstaedt, P.: The Quantum Theory of Measurement. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Busch, P., Grabowski, M., Lahti, P.: Operational Quantum Physics. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Busch, P., Lahti, P., Mittelstaedt, P.: The Quantum Theory of Measurement, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dalla Chiara, M.L., Giuntini, R., Greechie, R.: Reasoning in Quantum Theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ehlers, J., Pirani, F.A.E., Schild, A.: The geometry of free fall and light propagation. In: O’Raiffeartaigh, L. (ed.) General Relativity, pp. 63–84. Clarendon, Oxford (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Einstein, A.: Über spezielle und allgemeine Relativitätstheorie (Gemeinverständlich). Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig (1917)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Howard, D.: Who invented the ‘Copenhagen Interpretation’? A study in mythology. Philos. Sci. 71, 669–682 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Joensuu: In: Lahti, P., Mittelstaedt, P. (eds.) Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1990—Quantum Theory of Measurement and Related Philosophical Problems, Joensuu, Finland, 13–17 August 1990. World Scientific, Singapore (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kant, I.: The Critique of Pure Reason (trans: Guyer, P., Wood, A.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998), B600

    Google Scholar 

  13. Könneker, K.: Auflösung der Natur- Auflösung der Geschichte. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mach, E.: Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung, 4th edn. F.A. Brockhaus, Leipzig (1901) (English transl.: The Science of Mechanics (trans: McCormack, T.J.), Chicago, 1902)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Martzke, R., Wheeler, J.A.: Gravitation as geometry I: the geometry of space-time and the geometrodynamical standard meter. In: Chiu, H.Y., Hoffman, W.F. (eds.) Gravitation and Relativity, pp. 40–64. A. Benjamin, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mittelstaedt, P.: Klassische Mechanik, 2nd edn. Bilbliographisches Institut, Mannheim (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mittelstaedt, P.: The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Process. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mittelstaedt, P.: Intuitiveness and truth in modern physics. In: Carson, E., Huber, R. (eds.) Intuition and the Axiomatic Method, pp. 251–266. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Mittelstaedt, P.: Operational approach to a logic of quantum physics. In Agazzi, E., Thiel Ch. (eds.) Operations and Constructions in Science, Erlanger Forschungen, Reihe A, Band 111, Erlangen (2006)

  20. Poincaré, H.: La mesure du temps. Rev. Métaphys. Morale VI, 1–13 (1898)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reichenbach, H.: Philosophical Foundation of Quantum Mechanics. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles (1944). Deutsche Übers.: Philosophische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Birkhäuser, Basel (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stachel, J.: Einstein from B to Z. Birkhäuser, Boston (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. von Helmholtz, H.: Über die Tatsachen, die der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen. Nachrichten der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften und der Georg-Augusts-Universität. Nr. 9, pp. 193–221 (1868)

  24. von Neumann, J.: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer, Berlin (1932)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Mittelstaedt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mittelstaedt, P. The Problem of Interpretation of Modern Physics. Found Phys 41, 1667–1676 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9571-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9571-2

Keywords

Navigation