Skip to main content
Log in

A Discussion on Finite Quasi-cardinals in Quasi-set Theory

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quasi-set theory Q is an alternative set-theory designed to deal mathematically with collections of indistinguishable objects. The intended interpretation for those objects is the indistinguishable particles of non-relativistic quantum mechanics, under one specific interpretation of that theory. The notion of cardinal of a collection in Q is treated by the concept of quasi-cardinal, which in the usual formulations of the theory is introduced as a primitive symbol, since the usual means of cardinal definition fail for collections of indistinguishable objects. In a recent work, Domenech and Holik have proposed a definition of quasi-cardinality in Q. They claimed their definition of quasi-cardinal not only avoids the introduction of that notion as a primitive one, but also that it may be seen as a first step in the search for a version of Q that allows for a greater representative power. According to them, some physical systems can not be represented in the usual formulations of the theory, when the quasi-cardinal is considered as primitive. In this paper, we discuss their proposal and aims, and also, it is presented a modification from their definition we believe is simpler and more general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Castellani, E., Crosilla, L.: On French and Krause’s identity in physics: a historical, philosophical and formal analysis. Metascience (2010). doi:10.1007/s11016-010-9463-7

  2. Domenech, G., Holik, F.: A discussion on particle number and quantum indistinguishability. Found. Phys. 37(6), 855–878 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Fraenkel, A.A., Bar-Hillel, Y., Levy, A.: Foundations of Set Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. French, S.: On the whithering away of physical objects. In: Castellani, E. (ed.) Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum objects in Modern Physics, pp. 93–113. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. French, S., Krause, D.: Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. French, S., Krause, D.: Remarks on quasi-set theory. Studia Logica (2010). doi:10.1007/s11225-010-9249-3

  7. Lowe, E.J.: The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity and Time. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shoenfield, J.R.: Axioms of set theory. In: Barwise, J. (ed.) Handbook of Mathematical Logic, pp. 321–370. North Holland, Amsterdam (1977)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Becker Arenhart, J.R. A Discussion on Finite Quasi-cardinals in Quasi-set Theory. Found Phys 41, 1338–1354 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9552-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-011-9552-5

Keywords

Navigation