Abstract
Two physical approaches—as distinct, under the classification of Mittelstaedt, from formal approaches—to the problem of individuation of quantum objects are considered, one formulated in spatiotemporal terms and one in quantum mechanical terms. The spatiotemporal approach itself has two forms: one attributed to Einstein and based on the ontology of space-time points, and the other proposed by Howard and based on intersections of world lines. The quantum mechanical approach is also provided here in two forms, one based on interference and another based on a new Quantum Principle of Individuation (QPI). It is argued that the space-time approach to individuation fails and that the quantum approach offers several advantages over it, including consistency with Leibniz’s Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)
Castellani, E., Mittelstaedt, P.: Leibniz’s principle, physics, and the language of physics. Found. Phys. 30, 1587–1604 (2000)
Born, M.: Born, I. (ed.) The Born-Einstein Letters 1916–1955. Macmillan, London (2005), p. 162
Howard, D.: Space-time and separability. In: Cohen, R.S. et al. (eds.) Potentiality, Entanglement and Passion-at-a-Distance. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997), pp. 113–141
Feynman, R.: QED. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton (1985)
van Fraassen, B.: The problem of indistinguishable particles. In: Cushing, J.T. et al. (eds.) Science and Reality. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1984), p. 153
Gisin, N.: Bell’s inequality holds for all non-product states. Phys. Lett. A 154, 201–202 (1995)
Jaeger, G.S., Sergienko, A.V.: Multi-photon interferometry. In: Wolf, E. (ed.) Progress in Optics, vol. 42. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001). Chap. 5
Pan, J.W., et al.: Experimental entanglement swapping: entangling photons that never interacted. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891 (1998)
Strauss, M.: The logic of complementarity and the foundation of quantum theory. In: Strauss, M. (ed.) Modern Physics and Its Philosophy. Reidel, Dordrecht 1971)
Jaeger, G.S.: Individuation in quantum mechanics. In: Found. Phys. (in press). doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9382-x
Dirac, P.A.M.: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1958). Sect. 3
Jaeger, G.S.: New quantum mechanical results in interferometry. Boston University Ph.D. Thesis, UMI; Ann Arbor (1995), Chap. 4
Jaeger, G.S., Shimony, A., Vaidman, L.: Two interferometric complementarities. Phys. Rev. A 54, 51–67 (1995)
Schrödinger, E.: Naturwissenschaften 23, 807; 823 (1935). Trimmer, J.D. (transl.), Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124, 323 (1980)
Shimony, A.: Conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. In: Davies, P. (ed.) The New Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989), Chap. 13
Landau, L.: Das Dampfungsproblem in der Wellenmechanik. Z. Phys. 45, 430–441 (1927)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaeger, G. Individuation in Quantum Mechanics and Space-Time. Found Phys 40, 1396–1409 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9489-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9489-0