Skip to main content
Log in

The Non-unique Universe

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to elucidate, by means of concepts and theorems drawn from mathematical logic, the conditions under which the existence of a multiverse is a logical necessity in mathematical physics, and the implications of Gödel’s incompleteness theorem for theories of everything.

Three conclusions are obtained in the final section: (i) the theory of the structure of our universe might be an undecidable theory, and this constitutes a potential epistemological limit for mathematical physics, but because such a theory must be complete, there is no ontological barrier to the existence of a final theory of everything; (ii) in terms of mathematical logic, there are two different types of multiverse: classes of non-isomorphic but elementarily equivalent models, and classes of model which are both non-isomorphic and elementarily inequivalent; (iii) for a hypothetical theory of everything to have only one possible model, and to thereby negate the possible existence of a multiverse, that theory must be such that it admits only a finite model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Derdzinski, A.: Geometry of the Standard Model of Elementary Particles. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Earman, J.: Laws, Symmetry, and Symmetry Breaking; Invariance, Conservation Principles, and Objectivity, Presidential address PSA (2002)

  3. Enderton, H.B.: A Mathematical Introduction to Logic, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Geroch, R., Hartle, J.B.: Computability and physical theories. Found. Phys. 16(6), 533–550 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartmann, S.: Effective field theories, reductionism and scientific explanation. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 32, 267–304 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Linde, A.D.: Chaotic inflating universe. Pis’ma v Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki 38, 149–151 (1983a) [English translation: J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 38, 176–179]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Linde, A.D.: Chaotic inflation. Phys. Lett. B 129, 177–181 (1983b)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. McCabe, G.: The structure and interpretation of the standard model. In: Philosophy and Foundations of Physics, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mosterin, J.: Anthropic explanations in cosmology. In: Hajek, Valdés, Westerstahl (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smolin, L.: The case for background independence (2005). arXiv:hep-th/0507235v1

  11. Smolin, L.: The status of cosmological natural selection (2006). arXiv:hep-th/0612185

  12. Smolin, L.: The unique universe. Phys. World June, 21–25 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tegmark, M.: Is ‘the theory of everything’ merely the ultimate ensemble theory? Ann. Phys. 270, 1–51 (1998). arXiv:gr-qc/9704009

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tegmark, M.: The mathematical universe. Found. Phys. 38, 101–50 (2008). arXiv:0704.0646v2

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wallace, D.: Worlds in the Everett interpretation. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 33, 637–661 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon McCabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCabe, G. The Non-unique Universe. Found Phys 40, 629–637 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9425-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9425-3

Keywords

Navigation