Skip to main content
Log in

On the Possibility of Supertasks in General Relativity

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Malament-Hogarth spacetimes are the sort of models within general relativity that seem to allow for the possibility of supertasks. There are various ways in which these spacetimes might be considered physically problematic. Here, we examine these criticisms and investigate the prospect of escaping them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chakrabarti, S., Geroch, R., Liang, C.: Timelike curves of limited acceleration in general relativity. J. Math. Phys. 24, 597–598 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Earman, J.: Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Earman, J., Norton, J.: Forever is a day: supertasks in Pitowsky and Malament-Hogarth spacetimes. Philos. Sci. 60, 22–42 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Earman, J., Norton, J.: Infinite pains: the trouble with supertasks. In: Stich, S., Morton, A. (eds.) Benacerraf and His Critics, pp. 231–261. Blackwell, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geroch, R.: Domain of dependence. J. Math. Phys. 11, 437–449 (1970)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Geroch, R.: Spacetime structure from a global viewpoint. In: Sachs, B.K. (ed.) General Relativity and Cosmology, pp. 71–103. Academic Press, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geroch, R.: Prediction in general relativity. In: Earman, J., Glymour, C., Stachel, J. (eds.) Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 8, pp. 81–93. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geroch, R., Horowitz, G.: Global structure of spacetimes. In: Hawking, S., Israel, W. (eds.) General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, pp. 212–293. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hawking, S.W., Ellis, G.F.R.: The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hogarth, M.: Does general relativity allow an observer to view an eternity in a finite time? Found. Phys. Lett. 5, 173–181 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hogarth, M.: Non-Turing computers and non-Turing computability. In: Hull, D., Forbes, M., Burian, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994, pp. 126–138. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krasnikov, S.: Even the Minkowski space is holed. Phys. Rev. D 79, 124041 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Manchak, J.: Is prediction possible in general relativity? Found. Phys. 38, 317–321 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Manchak, J.: Is spacetime hole-free? Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 41, 1639–1643 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pitowski, I.: The physical Church thesis and physical computational complexity. Iyyun 39, 81–99 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wald, R.M.: General Relativity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Byron Manchak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manchak, J.B. On the Possibility of Supertasks in General Relativity. Found Phys 40, 276–288 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9390-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9390-x

Navigation