Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlocality Without Nonlocality

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bell’s theorem is purported to demonstrate the impossibility of a local “hidden variable” theory underpinning quantum mechanics. It relies on the well-known assumption of ‘locality’, and also on a little-examined assumption called ‘statistical independence’ (SI). Violations of this assumption have variously been thought to suggest “backward causation”, a “conspiracy” on the part of nature, or the denial of “free will”. It will be shown here that these are spurious worries, and that denial of SI simply implies nonlocal correlation between spacelike degrees of freedom. Lorentz-invariant theories in which SI does not hold are easily constructed: two are exhibited here. It is conjectured, on this basis, that quantum-mechanical phenomena may be modeled by a local theory after all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell, J.: On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, J.: La nouvelle cuisine. In: Bell, M., Gottfried, K., Veltman, M. (eds.) John S. Bell on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 216–234. World Scientific, Singapore (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bohm, D.: Quantum Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables. 1. Phys. Rev. 85, 166–179 (1952)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables. 2. Phys. Rev. 85, 180–193 (1952)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Holt, R.A.: Proposed experiment to test local hidden variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Conway, J., Kochen, S.: The free will theorem. Found. Phys. 36, 1441 (2006)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Costa De Beauregard, O.: S Matrix, Feynman zigzag and Einstein correlation. Phys. Lett. A 67, 171–174 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Courant, R.: Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. II: Partial Differential Equations. Interscience, New York (1962)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Craig, W., Weinstein, S.: On determinism and well-posedness in multiple time dimensions. Proc. R. Soc. A (2008, forthcoming). arXiv:0812.0210

  11. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fahmi, A.: Non-locality and classical communication of the hidden variable theories (2005). arXiv:quant-ph/0511009

  13. Fine, A.: Correlations and physical locality. In: Asquith, P., Giere, R. (eds.) PSA 1980, vol. 2, pp. 535–556. Philosophy of Science Association, E. Lansing (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fine, A.: The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hume, D.: A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (2000). Orig. pub. 1739–1740

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jarrett, J.: On the physical significance of the locality conditions in the Bell arguments. Noûs 18, 569–589 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Jarrett, J.: Bell’s theorem: a guide to the implications. In: Cushing, J., McMullin, E. (eds.) Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, pp. 60–79. Univ. of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. John, F.: Partial Differential Equations, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis, P.: Conspiracy theories of quantum mechanics. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 57, 359–381 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Price, H.: Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Redhead, M.: Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism. Clarendon, Oxford (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seevinck, M.: Parts and wholes: an inquiry into quantum and classical correlations. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University (2008). arXiv:0811.1027

  23. Shimony, A.: Controllable and uncontrollable non-locality. In: Kamefuchi, S., Ezawa, H., Namiki, M. (eds.) Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in Light of New Technology. The Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo (1984). Reprinted in A. Shimony, Search for a Naturalistic World View, vol. II, pp. 130–139, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shimony, A.: An exchange on local beables. In: Search for a Naturalistic World View, vol. II, pp. 163–170. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Spekkens, R.W.: Contextuality for preparations, transformations and unsharp measurements. Phys. Rev. A 71, 052108 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sutherland, R.I.: Bell’s theorem and backwards in time causality. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 22, 377–384 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. ’t Hooft, G.: On the free will postulate in quantum mechanics (2007). arXiv:quant-ph/0701097

  28. Weinstein, S.: Multiple time dimensions (2008). arXiv:0812.3869

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Weinstein.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to the memory of John A. Wheeler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weinstein, S. Nonlocality Without Nonlocality. Found Phys 39, 921–936 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9305-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9305-x

Keywords

Navigation