Abstract
In the many worlds community there seems to exist a belief that the physics of quantum theory is completely defined by it’s Hamilton operator given in an abstract Hilbert space, especially that the position basis may be derived from it as preferred using decoherence techniques.
We show, by an explicit example of non-uniqueness, taken from the theory of the KdV equation, that the Hamilton operator alone is not sufficient to fix the physics. We need the canonical operators \(\hat{p}\) , \(\hat{q}\) as well. As a consequence, it is not possible to derive a “preferred basis” from the Hamilton operator alone, without postulating some additional structure like a “decomposition into systems”. We argue that this makes such a derivation useless for fundamental physics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ablowitz, M.J., Clarkson, P.A.: Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 149. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)
Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. Phys. Rev. 85, 166–193 (1952)
Brown, H.R., Wallace, D.: Solving the measurement problem: de Broglie-Bohm loses out to Everett. Found. Phys. 35(4), 517 (2005). arXiv:quant-ph/0403094
de Broglie, L.: La nouvelle dynamique des quanta. In: Border, J. (ed.) Electrons et Photons: Rapports et Discussions du Cinquieme Conseil de Physique, pp. 105–132. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1928). English translation in: Bacciagaluppi, G., Valentini, A.: Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference, Cambridge University Press, and arXiv:quant-ph/0609184 (2006)
Freire, O. Jr.: Science and exile: David Bohm, the hot times of the Cold War, and his struggle for a new interpretation of quantum mechanics. Hist. Stud. Phys. Biol. Sci. 36(1), 1–34 (2005). arXiv:quant-ph/0508184
Gardner, C.S., Greene, J.M., Kruskal, M.D., Miura, R.M.: Method for solving the Korteweg-de Vries equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1095 (1967)
Kametaka, Y.: Korteweg-de Vries equation I. Global existence of smooth solutions. Proc. Jpn. Acad. 45, 552–555 (1969)
Lax, P.D.: Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 21, 467–490 (1968)
Pauli, W.: Remarques sur le problème des paramètres cachés dans la mécanique quantique et sur la théorie de l’onde pilote. In George, A. (ed.), Louis de Broglie–physicien et penseur (Paris, 1953), pp. 33–42
Schlosshauer, M.: Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1267–1305 (2004). arXiv:quant-ph/0312059
Takasaki, K.: Many faces of solitons. www.math.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~takasaki/soliton-lab/gallery/solitons
Tegmark, M.: Many worlds or many words. Fortschr. Phys. 46, 855 (1997). arXiv:quant-ph/9709032
Vaidman, L.: On schizophrenic experiences of the neutron or why we should believe in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum theory. Int. Stud. Philos. Sci. 12, 245–261 (1998). arXiv:quant-ph/9609006
Zurek, W.H.: Decoherence, einselection, and the existential interpretation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 356, 1793–1821 (1998). arXiv:quant-ph/9805065
Zurek, W.H.: Relative states and the environment: einselection, envariance, quantum Darwinism, and the existential interpretation. arXiv:0707.2832 and Los Alamos preprint LAUR 07-4568 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmelzer, I. Why the Hamilton Operator Alone Is not Enough. Found Phys 39, 486–498 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9299-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9299-4