Abstract
J.S. Bell believed that his famous theorem entailed a deep and troubling conflict between the empirically verified predictions of quantum theory and the notion of local causality that is motivated by relativity theory. Yet many physicists continue to accept, usually on the reports of textbook writers and other commentators, that Bell’s own view was wrong, and that, in fact, the theorem only brings out a conflict with determinism or the hidden-variables program or realism or some other such principle that (unlike local causality), allegedly, nobody should have believed anyway. Moreover, typically such beliefs arise without the person in question even being aware that the view they are accepting differs so radically from Bell’s own. Here we try to shed some light on the situation by focusing on the concept of local causality that is the heart of Bell’s theorem, and, in particular, by contrasting Bell’s own understanding with the analysis of Jon Jarrett which has been the most influential source, in recent decades, for the kinds of claims mentioned previously. We point out a crucial difference between Jarrett’s and Bell’s own understanding of Bell’s formulation of local causality, which turns out to be the basis for the erroneous claim, made by Jarrett and many others, that Bell misunderstood the implications of his own theorem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, J.S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Shimony, A.: Bell’s theorem. In: E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2006 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/bell-theorem/
Mermin, N.D.: What is quantum mechanics trying to tell us? Am. J. Phys. 66(9), 753–767 (1998)
Zukowski, M.: On the paradoxical book of Bell. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 36, 566–575 (2005)
Zeilinger, A.: The message of the quantum. Nature 438, 743 (2005)
Styer, D.: The Strange World of Quantum Mechanics, p. 42. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Greenstein, G., Zajonc, A.: The Quantum Challenge, 2nd edn. Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury (2006)
Townsend, J.: A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York (1992)
Kroemer, H.: Quantum Mechanics. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1994)
Liboff, R.: Introductory Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1992)
Maudlin, T.: Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Malden (2002)
Norsen, T.: Bell locality and the nonlocal character of nature. Found. Phys. Lett. 19(7), 633–655 (2006)
Jarrett, J.: On the physical significance of the locality conditions in the Bell arguments. Nous 18, 569–589 (1984)
Shimony, A.: Metaphysical problems in the foundations of quantum mechanics. Int. Philos. Q. 18, 3–17 (1978)
Redhead, M.L.G.: Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism: A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987)
Cushing, J., McMullin, E. (eds.): Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1989). (See especially the contributions of Paul Teller and Don Howard)
Fogel, B.: Formalizing the separability condition in Bell’s theorem. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 38, 920–937 (2007)
Butterfield, J.: Bell’s theorem: what it takes. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 43, 41–83 (1992)
Norsen, T.: Einstein’s boxes. Am. J. Phys. 73(2), 164–176 (2005)
Shimony, A., Horne, M.A., Clauser, J.F.: An exchange on local beables. Dialectica 39, 86–110 (1985)
Redhead, M., Brown, H.: Nonlocality in quantum mechanics. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, vol. 65, pp. 119–159 (1991)
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)
Ballentine, L.E., Jarrett, J.P.: Bell’s theorem: does quantum mechanics contradict relativity? Am. J. Phys. 55(8), 696–701 (1987)
Jarrett, J.: Bell’s theorem: a guide to the implications. In: J. Cushing, E. McMullin, (eds.), op cit.
Elby, A., Brown, H.R., Foster, S.: What makes a theory physically complete? Found. Phys. 23(7), 971–985 (1993)
Berkovitz, J.: Action at a distance in quantum mechanics. In: E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2007 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2007/entries/qm-action-distance/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Norsen, T. Local Causality and Completeness: Bell vs. Jarrett. Found Phys 39, 273–294 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9281-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9281-1