Skip to main content
Log in

Are Causality Violations Undesirable?

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Causality violations are typically seen as unrealistic and undesirable features of a physical model. The following points out three reasons why causality violations, which Bonnor and Steadman identified even in solutions to the Einstein equation referring to ordinary laboratory situations, are not necessarily undesirable. First, a space-time in which every causal curve can be extended into a closed causal curve is singularity free—a necessary property of a globally applicable physical theory. Second, a causality-violating space-time exhibits a nontrivial topology—no closed timelike curve (CTC) can be homotopic among CTCs to a point, or that point would not be causally well behaved—and nontrivial topology has been explored as a model of particles. Finally, if every causal curve in a given space-time passes through an event horizon, a property which can be called “causal censorship”, then that space-time with event horizons excised would still be causally well behaved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonnor, W.B.: Closed timelike curves in classical relativity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 12, 1705–1708 (2003)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonnor, W.B., Steadman, B.R.: The double-Kerr solution. Class. Quantum Gravity 21, 2723–2732 (2004)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonnor, W.B., Steadman, B.R.: Exact solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell equations with closed timelike curves. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 37, 1833 (2005)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hawking, S.W., Ellis, G.F.R.: The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Senovilla, J.M.M.: Singularity theorems and their consequences. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 30, 701–848 (1998)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Tipler, F.J.: Singularities and causality violation. Ann. Phys. 108, 1–36 (1977)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Krasnikov, S.: The end of the time machine. Class. Quantum Gravity 19, 4109 (2002)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Geroch, R.: Topology in general relativity. J. Math. Phys. 8, 782–786 (1967)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernal, A.N., Sanchez, M.: Globally hyperbolic spacetimes can be defined as causal instead of strongly causal. Class. Quantum Gravity 24, 745 (2007)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman, J.L., Schleich, K., Witt, D.M.: Topological censorship. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1486–1489 (1993)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Misner, C.W., Wheeler, J.A.: Classical physics as geometry: gravitation, electromagnetism, unquantized charge, and mass as properties of curved empty space. Ann. Phys. 2, 525–603 (1957)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lickorish, W.: Homeomorphisms of non-orientable two-manifolds. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 59, 307 (1963)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gibbons, G.W., Hawking, S.W.: Selection rules for topology change. Commun. Math. Phys. 148, 345–352 (1992)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibbons, G.W., Hawking, S.W.: Kinks and topology change. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1719–1721 (1992)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Borde, A.: Topology change in classical general relativity. gr-qc/9406053 (1994)

  16. Avez, A.: Essais de géométrie riemannienne hyperbolique globale. Applications a la relativité générale. Ann. Inst. Fourier 13, 105–190 (1963)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Galloway, G.J.: Closed timelike geodesics. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 285, 379–388 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia-Parrado, A., Senovilla, J.M.M.: Causal structures and causal boundaries. Class. Quantum Gravity 22, R1–R84 (2005)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Flaherty, F.J.: Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 48, 199–202 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, J.W.: Fundamental groups on a Lorentz manifold. Am. J. Math. 82, 873–890 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hawking, S., Penrose, R.: The Nature of Space and Time. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hunter Monroe.

Additional information

In honor of the retirement from Davidson College of Dr. L. Richardson King, an extraordinary teacher and mathematician. An earlier version (gr-qc/0609054v2) was selected as co-winner of the CTC Essay Prize set by Queen Mary College, University of London. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and should not be attributed to the International Monetary Fund, its Executive Board, or its management. This paper was not prepared using official resources. Comments are appreciated from anonymous referees and from participants in seminars at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and Davidson College.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Monroe, H. Are Causality Violations Undesirable?. Found Phys 38, 1065–1069 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-008-9254-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-008-9254-9

Keywords

Navigation