Abstract
We respond to criticism of our paper “Paradox in Wave-Particle Duality for Non-Perturbative Measurements”. We disagree with Steuernagel’s derivation of the visibility of the Afshar experiment. To calculate the fringe visibility, Steuernagel utilizes two different experimental situations, i.e. the wire grid in the pattern minima and in the pattern maxima. In our assessment, this procedure cannot lead to the correct result for the complementarity properties of a wave-particle in one particular experimental set-up.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afshar, S.S., Flores, E., McDonald, K.F., Knoesel, E.: Paradox in wave-particle duality for non-perturbative measurements. Found. Phys. 37, 295 (2007)
Steuernagel, O.: Afshar’s experiment does not show a violation of complementarity. Found. Phys. 37, 1370–1385 (2007)
Afshar, S.S.: Violation of the principle of complementarity, and its implications. Proc. SPIE 5866, 229–244 (2005)
Flores, E., Knoesel, E.: Why Kastner analysis does not apply to a modified Afshar experiment. E. Proc. SPIE 6664, 66640O (2007)
Dürr, S., Nonn, T., Rempe, G.: Origin of quantum-mechanical complementarity probed by a ‘which-way’ experiment in an atom interferometer. Nature 395, 33 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flores, E.V. Reply to Comments of Steuernagel on the Afshar’s Experiment. Found Phys 38, 778–781 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-008-9234-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-008-9234-0