Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Typicality vs. Probability in Trajectory-Based Formulations of Quantum Mechanics

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bohmian mechanics represents the universe as a set of paths with a probability measure defined on it. The way in which a mathematical model of this kind can explain the observed phenomena of the universe is examined in general. It is shown that the explanation does not make use of the full probability measure, but rather of a suitable set function deriving from it, which defines relative typicality between single-time cylinder sets. Such a set function can also be derived directly from the standard quantum formalism, without the need of an underlying probability measure. The key concept for this derivation is the quantum typicality rule, which can be considered as a generalization of the Born rule. The result is a new formulation of quantum mechanics, in which particles follow definite trajectories, but which is based only on the standard formalism of quantum mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allori, V., Zanghì, N.: What is Bohmian mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 43, 1743 (2004), quant-ph/0112008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, J.S.: The measurement theory of Everett and de Broglie’s pilot wave. In: Bell, J.S. (ed.) Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, J.S.: Quantum mechanics for cosmologists. In: Bell, J.S. (ed.) Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, op. cit

  4. Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation in terms of “Hidden Variables”: Part I. Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation in terms of “Hidden Variables”: Part II. Phys. Rev. 85, 180 (1952)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bohm, D., Hiley, B.J., Kaloyerou, P.N.: An ontological basis for the quantum theory. Phys. Rep. 6, 321 (1987)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Deotto, E., Ghirardi, G.C.: Bohmian mechanics revisited. Found. Phys. 28, 1 (1998), quant-ph/9704021

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dereziński, J., Gerard, C.: Scattering Theory of Classical and Quantum N-Particle Systems. Springer, New York (1997). Also available at the url http://www.fuw.edu.pl/~derezins/

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Zanghì, N.: Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty. J. Stat. Phys. 67, 843 (1992), quant-ph/0308039

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Zanghì, N.: Bohmian mechanics as the foundation of quantum mechanics. In: Cushing, J.T., Fine, A., Goldstein, S. (eds.) Bohmian Mechanics and quantum Theory: An Appraisal. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1996), quant-ph/9511016

    Google Scholar 

  11. DeWitt, B., Graham, N. (eds.): The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Cambridge (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Everett, H.: Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldstein, S.: Boltzmann’s approach to statistical mechanics. In: Bricmont, J., Dürr, D., Galavotti, M.C., Ghirardi, G., Petruccione, F., Zanghì, N. (eds.) Chance in Physics: Foundations and Perspectives. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 574. Springer, Berlin (2001), cond-mat/0105242

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffiths, R.B.: Consistent Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mott, N.: The wave mechanics of alpha-ray tracks. Proc. R. Soc. A 126, 79 (1929). Reprinted as Sec.I-6 of Quantum Theory and Measurement, Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H. Princeton (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Peruzzi, G., Rimini, A.: Quantum measurements in a family of hidden-variables theories. Found. Phys. Lett. 9, 505 (1996), quant-ph/9607004

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Reed, M., Simon, B.: Functional Analysis, p. 290. Academic Press, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Struyve, W., Westman, H.: A new pilot-wave model for quantum field theory. In: Bassi, A., Dürr, D., Weber, T., Zanghì, N. (eds.) Quantum Mechanics: Are there Quantum Jumps? On the Present Status of Quantum Mechanics. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 844. American Institute of Physics (2006), quant-ph/0602229

  19. Zurek, W.H.: Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003), quant-ph/0105127

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Loc. Melta 40, 38014, Trento, Italy

    Bruno Galvan

Authors
  1. Bruno Galvan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Galvan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galvan, B. Typicality vs. Probability in Trajectory-Based Formulations of Quantum Mechanics. Found Phys 37, 1540–1562 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9174-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9174-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation