Skip to main content
Log in

Ortho- and Para-helium in Relativistic Schrödinger Theory

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The characteristic features of ortho- and para-helium are investigated within the framework of Relativistic Schrödinger Theory (RST). The emphasis lies on the conceptual level, where the geometric and physical properties of both RST field configurations are inspected in detail. From the geometric point of view, the striking feature consists in the splitting of the \(\mathfrak{u}(2)\)-valued bundle connection \(\mathcal{A}_{\mu}\) into an abelian electromagnetic part (organizing the electromagnetic interactions between the two electrons) and an exchange part, which is responsible for their exchange interactions. The electromagnetic interactions are mediated by the usual four-potentials A μ and thus are essentially the same for both types of field configurations, where naturally the electrostatic forces (described by the time component A 0 of A μ) dominate their magnetostatic counterparts (described by the space part A of A μ). Quite analogously to this, the exchange forces are as well described in terms of a certain vector potential (B μ), again along the gauge principles of minimal coupling, so that also the exchange forces split up into an “electric” type ( \(\rightsquigarrow B_{0}\)) and a “magnetic” type ( \(\rightsquigarrow {\bf B}\)). The physical difference of ortho- and para-helium is now that the first (ortho-) type is governed mainly by the “electric” kind of exchange forces and therefore is subject to a stronger influence of the exchange phenomenon; whereas the second (para-) type has vanishing “electric” exchange potential (B 0 ≡ 0) and therefore realizes exclusively the “magnetic” kind of interactions ( \(\rightsquigarrow {\bf B}\)), which, however, in general are smaller than their “electric” counterparts. The corresponding ortho/para splitting of the helium energy levels is inspected merely in the lowest order of approximation, where it coincides with the Hartree–Fock (HF) approximation. Thus RST may be conceived as a relativistic generalization of the HF approach where the fluid-dynamic character of RST implies many similarities with the density functional theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duck I.D., Sudarshan E.C.G., (1998). Pauli and the Spin-Statistics Theorem. World Scientific, Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Gross F., (1999). Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Verschl M., Mattes M., Sorg M., (2004). Eur. Phys. J. A 20, 211

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schust P., Mattes M., Sorg M., (2004). Found. Phys. 34, 99

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pruß-Hunzinger S., Mattes M., Sorg M., (2004). Nuov. Cim. B 119, 277

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Drake G.F.W., (1996). Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Handbook. American Institute of Physics, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schust P., Stary F., Mattes M., Sorg M., (2005). Found. Phys 35: 1043

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pruß-Hunzinger S., Stary F., Mattes M., Sorg M., (2005). Nuov. Cim. B 120, 467

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pruß-Hunzinger S., Sorg M., (2003). Nuov. Cim. B 118, 903

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Merzbacher E., (1970). Quantum Mechanics. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bethe H.A., Salpeter E.E., (1957). Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson S., ed., (1988). Methods in Computational Chemistry, vol 2, Relativistic Effects in Atoms and Molecules. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Schust and M. Sorg, “Magnetic interactions in relativistic two-particle systems,” preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0410023 (2004).

  14. NIST Atomic Spectra Database, http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/index.html Version 3.0.2 (2005).

  15. Froese-Fischer C., (1977). The Hartree–Fock Method for Atoms. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Froese-Fischer C., Brage T., Joensson P., (1997). Computational Atomic Structure. IOP, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gorceix O., Indelicato P., Desclaux J.P., (1987). J. Phys. B 20: 639/651

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Plante D.R., Johnson W.R., Sapirstein J., (1994). Phys. Rev. A 49: 3519

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Drake G.W., (1988). Can. J. Phys 66, 586

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Sorg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stary, F., Sorg, M. Ortho- and Para-helium in Relativistic Schrödinger Theory. Found Phys 36, 1325–1403 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-006-9066-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-006-9066-8

Keywords

Navigation