On “Gauge Renormalization” in Classical Electrodynamics
- 89 Downloads
In this paper we pay attention to the inconsistency in the derivation of the symmetric electromagnetic energy–momentum tensor for a system of charged particles from its canonical form, when the homogeneous Maxwell’s equations are applied to the symmetrizing gauge transformation, while the non-homogeneous Maxwell’s equations are used to obtain the motional equation. Applying the appropriate non-homogeneous Maxwell’s equations to both operations, we obtained an additional symmetric term in the tensor, named as “compensating term”. Analyzing the structure of this “compensating term”, we suggested a method of “gauge renormalization”, which allows transforming the divergent terms of classical electrodynamics (infinite self-force, self-energy and self-momentum) to converging integrals. The motional equation obtained for a non-radiating charged particle does not contain its self-force, and the mass parameter includes the sum of mechanical and electromagnetic masses. The motional equation for a radiating particle also contains the sum of mechanical and electromagnetic masses, and does not yield any “runaway solutions”. It has been shown that the energy flux in a free electromagnetic field is guided by the Poynting vector, whereas the energy flux in a bound EM field is described by the generalized Umov’s vector, defined in the paper. The problem of electromagnetic momentum is also examined.
Keywordsclassical electrodynamics energy–momentum tensor gauge transformation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Lorentz H.A, The Theory of Electrons, 2nd edn. (Dover, 1952).Google Scholar
- 2.Abraham M, (1903). “Die Prinzipien der Dynamik des Elektrons”. Ann. Phys. 10: 105Google Scholar
- 4.Born M, Infeld L, (1934). “Foundations of the new field theory”. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 144, 145Google Scholar
- 9.Pauli W, (1958). Principles of quantum mechanics, Encyclopedia of Physics, Vol V/1. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 11.Feynman R.P, Leighton R.B, Sands M, (1964). The Feynman Lectures in Physics, Vol 2. Addison-Wesley, Reading MassGoogle Scholar
- 12.Yang K.-H., (1976). “Gauge transformations and quantum mechanics II. Physical interpretation of classical gauge transformations”. Ann. Phys. 101, 97Google Scholar
- 14.Møller C., (1972). The Theory of Relativity. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 17.Umov N.A, Izbrannye Sochineniya (Gostechizdat, Moscow, 1950) (in Russian).Google Scholar
- 25.H. Poincaré, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 21, 129 (1906). (Engl. trans. with modern notation in Schwartz H.M, “Poincaré’s Rendincoti paper on relativity” Am. J. Phys. 40, 862 (1972)).Google Scholar