Local Realism and Conditional Probability
Emilio Santos has argued (Santos, Studies in History and Philosophy of Physics http: //arxiv-org/abs/quant-ph/0410193) that to date, no experiment has provided a loophole-free refutation of Bell’s inequalities. He believes that this provides strong evidence for the principle of local realism, and argues that we should reject this principle only if we have extremely strong evidence. However, recent work by Malley and Fine (Non-commuting observables and local realism, http: //arxiv-org/abs/quant-ph/0505016) appears to suggest that experiments refuting Bell’s inequalities could at most confirm that quantum mechanical quantities do not commute. They also suggest that experiments performed on a single system could refute local realism. In this paper, we develop a connection between the work of Malley and Fine and an argument by Bub from some years ago [Bub, The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Chapter VI(Reidel, Dodrecht,1974)]. We also argue that the appearance of conflict between Santos on the one hand and Malley and Fine on the other is a result of differences in the way they understand local realism.
KeywordsBell’s inequality local realism hidden variables nonlocality Kochen–Specker theorem quantum conditional probability
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Bub J. (1974). The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Chapter VI. Reidel, DodrechtGoogle Scholar
- 3.P. Busch, “Quantum States and Generalized Observables: A Simple Proof of Gleason’s Theorem,” http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9909073.Google Scholar
- 4.A. Einstein, “Quantenmechanik und Wirklichkeit,” Dialectica 2, 320–324 (1948). Quoted and translated in D. Howard, “Holism, separability and the metaphysical implications of the Bell experiments,” in Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, J. T. Cushing and E. McMullin, eds. (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1989), p. 233Google Scholar
- 5.Fine A. (1982). “Correlations and physical locality”. In: Asquith P., Giere R (eds). PSA 1980 vol 2. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 535–562Google Scholar
- 12.J. D. Malley, “All quantum observables in a hidden-variables model must commute simultaneously,” http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0402126.Google Scholar
- 13.J. D. Malley and A. Fine, “Noncommuting observables and local realism,” http://arxiv. org/abs/quant-ph/0505016.Google Scholar
- 14.E. Santos, “Bell’s theorem and the experiments: increasing support to local realism?,” fothcoming in Studies in History and Philosophy of Physics; available at http://arxiv.org/ abs/quant-ph/0410193 (references here are to this version).Google Scholar