Skip to main content
Log in

Comments on Shimony’s “An Analysis of Stapp’s ‘A Bell-Type Theorem without Hidden Variables’ ”

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The hidden-variable theorems of Bell and followers depend upon an assumption, namely the hidden-variable assumption, that conflicts with the precepts of quantum philosophy. Hence from an orthodox quantum perspective those theorems entail no faster-than-light transfer of information. They merely reinforce the ban on hidden variables. The need for some sort of faster-than-light information transfer can be shown by using counterfactuals instead of hidden variables. Shimony’s criticism of that argument fails to take into account the distinction between no-faster-than-light connection in one direction and that same condition in both directions. The argument can be cleanly formulated within the framework of a fixed past, open future interpretation of quantum theory, which neatly accommodates the critical assumptions that the experimenters are free to choose which experiments they will perform. The assumptions are compatible with the Tomonaga–Schwinger formulation of quantum field theory, and hence with orthodox quantum precepts, and with the relativistic requirement that no prediction pertaining to an outcome in one region can depend upon a free choice made in a region spacelike-separated from the first.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Shimony, “An Analysis of Stapp’s ‘A Bell-type theorem without hidden variables’,” Found. Phys.

  2. Stapp H.P. (2004). “A Bell-type theorem without hidden variables”. Am. J. of Phys. 72:30–33

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Stapp H.P. (1997). “Nonlocal character of quantum theory”. Am. J. Phys. 65:300–304

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell J.S. (1964). “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox”. Physics 1:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clauser J.F. and Shimony A. (1978). “Bell’s theorem: Experimental tests and implications”. Rep. Prog. Phys. 41:1881–1927

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tomonaga S. (1946). “On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields”. Prog. Theor. Phys 1:27–42

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwinger J. (1951). “The theory of quantized fields I”. Phys. Rev 82:914–927

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry P. Stapp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stapp, H.P. Comments on Shimony’s “An Analysis of Stapp’s ‘A Bell-Type Theorem without Hidden Variables’ ”. Found Phys 36, 73–82 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-005-9005-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-005-9005-0

Keywords

Navigation