Skip to main content
Log in

Consciousness and the Wigner’s Friend Problem

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

It is generally agreed that decoherence theory is, if not a complete answer, at least a great step forward towards a solution of the quantum measurement problem. It is shown here however that in the cases in which a sentient being is explicitly assumed to take cognizance of the outcome the reasons we have for judging this way are not totally consistent, so that the question has to be considered anew. It is pointed out that the way the Broglie–Bohm model solves the riddle suggests a possible clue, consisting in assuming that even very simple systems may have some sort of a proto-consciousness, but that their “internal states of consciousness” are not predictive. It is, next, easily shown that if we imagine the systems get larger, in virtue of decoherence their internal states of consciousness progressively gain in predictive value. So that, for macro-systems, they may be identified (in practice) with the predictive states of consciousness on which we ground our observational predictions. The possibilities of carrying over this idea to standard quantum mechanics are then investigated. Conditions of conceptual consistency are considered and found rather strict, and, finally, two solutions emerge, differing conceptually very much from one another but in both of which the, possibly non-predictive, generalized internal states of consciousness play a crucial role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Schlick (1918) Allgemeine Erkennislehre Springer Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. d’Espagnat, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, 4th ed. Perseus Books, Reading, Mass., 1999).

  3. A. Bassi G.C. Ghirardi (2000) Phys Lett A. 275 373 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00612-5 Occurrence Handle2000PhLA..275..373B Occurrence Handle2001j:81023

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan, ArXiv, quant-ph/9803018 (1998).

  5. B. d’Espagnat, Veiled Reality. 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 2003).

  6. B. d’Espagnat (2001) Phys Lett A. 282 133 Occurrence Handle2001PhLA..282..133D Occurrence Handle1829363

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Omnès (1994) The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. d’Espagnat, ArXiv, quant.ph.0301160 (2003).

  9. H.P. Stapp (1972) ArticleTitleCopenhagen interpretation” Am J Phys 40 1098 Occurrence Handle10.1119/1.1986768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. d’Espagnat, Traité de physique et de philosophie (Fayard, Paris, 2002), English ed., Princeton University Press, to appear in 2006.

  11. D. Bohm B.J. Hiley (1993) The Undivided Universe Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.S. Bell (1987) Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. de Montbrial, “Evénements et temps quasi leibnizien,” in Implications philosophiques de la physique contemporaine T.3, B. d’Espagnat, ed. (P. U. F., Paris, 2003).

  14. D. Kranz, D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky, Foundations of Measurement, Vol. 7, (Academic Press, 1971).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard d’Espagnat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

d’Espagnat, B. Consciousness and the Wigner’s Friend Problem. Found Phys 35, 1943–1966 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-005-8656-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-005-8656-1

Keywords

Navigation